Cited by 61Bone health and osteoporosis researchBone fractures and treatmentsBone health and treatments

No adverse effects of clodronate on fracture healing in rats.

Open access
Madsen, Jan E, Berg-larsen, Trine, Kirkeby, Ole J, Falch, Jan A, Nordsletten, Lars·1998·Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica

Abstract

Clodronate was administered daily 28 days before and after an experimental tibial fracture in 35 male rats, and the effect on fracture healing and posttraumatic bone loss was studied. 5 groups were tested. The clodronate/clodronate group received clodronate in daily doses of 10 mg/kg body weight for 28 days before being subjected to a standardized fracture of the right tibia, and during the fracture healing period of 28 days. The clodronate/saline group received clodronate before fracture and saline during the healing period. The saline/clodronate group received saline before and clodronate after fracture. The saline/saline group received saline only, while the control group served as unfractured, untreated controls. After 28 days of fracture healing, the tibias were evaluated with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, and tested mechanically in a 3-point ventral bending test. Bone mineral content and bone mineral density were approximately 30% higher in the groups receiving clodronate during the experiment, compared to the untreated groups. The weight and cross-sectional area of the fracture callus were equal in all groups. Whether clodronate was administered before the fracture, after the fracture or both, did not affect the bone mineral. Ultimate bending moment, energy absorption, stiffness and deflection were not significantly different between the groups. Our findings suggest that clodronate increases bone mineral both when given before and after a tibial shaft fracture, without affecting fracture healing at 28 days.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/17453679808997793

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Frost H M. The biology of fracture healing. An overview for cli- nicians. 1 and 11. Clin Orthop 1989; 248: 283-309.
  2. Koranyi E, Bowman E, Knecht C D, Janssen M. Holding power of orthopaedic screws in bone. Clin Orthop 1970; 72: 283-6.
  3. Madsen J E, Almaas R, Nordsletten L. Strength reduction of the femoral shaft and neck after ipsilateral tibia1 fracture in the rat. Eur J Exp Musculoskel Res 1995; 4: 65-8.
  4. Ott S M. Clinical effects of hisphosphonates in involutional os- teoporosis. J Bone Miner Res (Suppl) 1993; 8: 597-606.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Madsen, J. E., Berg-larsen, T., Kirkeby, O. J., Falch, J. A., & Nordsletten, L.
Affiliations
  • Oslo University Hospital (NO)
  • University of Oslo (NO)
Venue
Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica
Published
1998-01
Volume
69
Issue
5
Pages
532-536
ISSN
0001-6470 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2107521881
Cited by
61
References
29
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • Acta Orthopaedica (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Bone fractures and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Bone health and treatments
Keywords
clodronate, bisphosphonates, fracture healing, tibial fractures, bone mineral density, bone mineral content, fracture callus, bone mechanical properties
MeSH terms
Animals, Biomechanical Phenomena, Bone Resorption, Clodronic Acid, Disease Models, Animal, Drug Evaluation, Preclinical, Male, Premedication, Radionuclide Imaging, Tibial Fractures, Absorptiometry, Photon, Bone Density, Fracture Healing, Rats, Wistar, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review