Cited by 43Context-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsPhysical Activity and HealthBalance, Gait, and Falls Prevention

Real-time elderly activity monitoring system based on a tri-axial accelerometer

Kang, Dong Won, Choi, Jin Seung, Lee, Jeong Whan, Chung, Soon Cheol, Park, Soo Jun, Tack, Gye Rae·2010·Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to develop an automatic human movement classification system for the elderly using single waist-mounted tri-axial accelerometer. METHODS: Real-time movement classification algorithm was developed using a hierarchical binary tree, which can classify activities of daily living into four general states: (1) resting state such as sitting, lying, and standing; (2) locomotion state such as walking and running; (3) emergency state such as fall and (4) transition state such as sit to stand, stand to sit, stand to lie, lie to stand, sit to lie, and lie to sit. To evaluate the proposed algorithm, experiments were performed on five healthy young subjects with several activities, such as falls, walking, running, etc. RESULTS: The results of experiment showed that successful detection rate of the system for all activities were about 96%. To evaluate long-term monitoring, 3 h experiment in home environment was performed on one healthy subject and 98% of the movement was successfully classified. CONCLUSIONS: The results of experiment showed a possible use of this system which can monitor and classify the activities of daily living. For further improvement of the system, it is necessary to include more detailed classification algorithm to distinguish several daily activities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/17483101003718112

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kang, D. W., Choi, J. S., Lee, J. W., Chung, S. C., Park, S. J., & Tack, G. R.
Affiliations
  • Konkuk University (KR)
  • Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (KR)
Corresponding author
Tack, Gye Rae
Venue
Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology
Published
2010-03-19
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
247-253
ISSN
  • 1748-3107 (ISSN-L)
  • 1748-3115
OpenAlex
W2118626516
Cited by
43
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Konkuk University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Keywords
elderly activity monitoring, triaxial accelerometer, human movement classification, activities of daily living, fall detection, sit-to-stand, real-time monitoring, wearable sensors
MeSH terms
Acceleration, Accidental Falls, Activities of Daily Living, Age Factors, Aged, Algorithms, Biomechanical Phenomena, Computer Systems, Equipment Design, Humans, Locomotion, Posture, Rest, Risk Factors, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Time Factors, Walking, Monitoring, Ambulatory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review