Cited by 65Frailty in Older AdultsAging, Health, and DisabilityBalance, Gait, and Falls Prevention

Reliability and validity of the Frail Elderly Functional Assessment questionnaire

Gloth, F Michael, Walston, Jeremy, Meyer, Jennifer, Pearson, Jay·1995·American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation

Abstract

Measuring functional activity for elderly at very low functional levels remains a challenge because many functional instruments have not been standardized in a frail elderly population. The Frail Elderly Functional Assessment questionnaire (FEFA) is a 19-item, interviewer-administered questionnaire designed to assess function in frail elderly at a very low activity level. The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability and validity of this instrument in a frail elderly population. Two groups of subjects over 65 yr old were selected to test the reliability and validity of this questionnaire. Test-retest reliability was determined by correlating the responses of 29 homebound (including nursing home-bound) subjects who answered the questionnaire on two occasions 2 wk apart. To assess the validity of the FEFA, the questionnaire was administered to 23 frail, homebound (including nursing home-bound) elderly subjects who had a Mini-Mental State Examination score of > or = 18. Validity was determined by correlating patient responses to direct observations by the investigators of tasks addressed in the questionnaire. Correlation was also determined against the Katz's Activity of Daily Living index, Lawton's Instrumental Activity of Daily Living index, and the Barthel index. The reliability coefficient was 0.82. Correlation between the FEFA questionnaire and direct observation of questionnaire task performance was 0.90. Construct validity against the Katz's Activity of Daily Living, Lawton's Instrumental Activity of Daily Living, and the Barthel index showed correlations of 0.86, 0.67 and 0.91, respectively. Initial data indicate that the FEFA is a valid and reliable instrument that may be useful in assessing function in frail elderly people.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00002060-199501000-00008

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Frail Elderly Functional Questionnaire (19 items) was identified as a potential outcome measure for frailty intervention studies because it is suitable for telephone or proxy use, valid and reliable, and sensitive to change.

    “The Frail Elderly Functional Questionnaire (19 items) was identified as a potential outcome measure for frailty intervention studies as it is suitable for use by telephone or proxy, valid and reliable (100), and is sensitive to change (101).”

    From Frailty in elderly people (2013) · cites this paper as [101]

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gloth, F. M., Walston, J., Meyer, J., & Pearson, J.
Affiliations
MedStar Union Memorial Hospital (US)
Venue
American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
Published
1995-01
Volume
74
Issue
1
Pages
45-53
ISSN
0894-9115 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2046275756
Cited by
65
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Keywords
frail elderly, functional assessment, test-retest reliability, construct validity, homebound older adults, nursing home residents, activities of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living, Barthel Index, Katz Index, questionnaire development
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Disability Evaluation, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Baltimore, Reproducibility of Results, Cohort Studies, Frail Elderly, Homebound Persons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review