Cited by 20Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationCystic Fibrosis Research Advances

Pilot evaluation of web enabled symptom monitoring in cystic fibrosis

Open access
Roehrer, Erin, Cummings, Elizabeth, Beggs, Sean, Turner, Paul, Hauser, Jenny, Micallef, Nicole, Ellis, Leonie, Reid, David·2013·Informatics for Health and Social Care

Abstract

BACKGROUND: People with cystic fibrosis (CF) frequently experience isolation and are subjected to extensive complex treatment regimens which could be complemented by remote support. In the current research this is particularly relevant as the location, Tasmania, has the second highest incidence of CF in the world. This paper provides an overview of the evaluation of a pilot trial of an information system conceptualised and developed to assist people with CF, and their families, to enhance their skills and communication in relation to self-management for their condition. METHODS: The pilot involved people with CF ranging in age from 19 months to 52 years and their families. The primary outcome was the perceived usability of the online-symptom diary from the user's perspective. To assess perceived usability qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted pre- and post-pilot and analysed using thematic coding. RESULTS: Participants initially and primarily perceived myCF as a system that would help others and enable peer support. Connectivity and involvement were highlighted as complex issues that needed consideration. CONCLUSION: There was an overall encouraging response to the pilot and indications that the use of information communication technology to complement health care delivery and facilitate self-care skills may be particularly suited to the Australian context where geographical distances and isolation provide a relative barrier to specialist care for chronic complex conditions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/17538157.2013.812646

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roehrer, E., Cummings, E., Beggs, S., Turner, P., Hauser, J., Micallef, N., Ellis, L., & Reid, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Tasmania (AU)
  • Royal Hobart Hospital (AU)
  • QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute (AU)
Corresponding author
Roehrer, Erin
Venue
Informatics for Health and Social Care
Published
2013-08-19
Volume
38
Issue
4
Pages
354-365
ISSN
  • 1753-8157 (ISSN-L)
  • 1753-8165
OpenAlex
W1980977136
Cited by
20
References
9
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Informatics for Health and Social Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
Keywords
cystic fibrosis, self-management, perceived usability, remote patient support, peer support, information and communication technologies, geographic isolation, Tasmania
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child, Preschool, Cystic Fibrosis, Humans, Infant, Information Systems, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Self Care, Tasmania, User-Computer Interface, Patient-Centered Care, Internet, Qualitative Research, Consumer Health Information, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review