Factors affecting the quality of sound recording for speech and voice analysis
Abstract
The importance and utility of objective evidence-based measurement of the voice is well documented. Therefore, greater consideration needs to be given to the factors that influence the quality of voice and speech recordings. This manuscript aims to bring together the many features that affect acoustically acquired voice and speech. Specifically, the paper considers the practical requirements of individual speech acquisition configurations through examining issues relating to hardware, software and microphone selection, the impact of environmental noise, analogue to digital conversion and file format as well as the acoustic measures resulting from varying levels of signal integrity. The type of recording environment required by a user is often dictated by a variety of clinical and experimental needs, including: the acoustic measures being investigated; portability of equipment; an individual's budget; and the expertise of the user. As the quality of recorded signals is influenced by many factors, awareness of these issues is essential. This paper aims to highlight the importance of these methodological considerations to those previously uninitiated with voice and speech acoustics. With current technology, the highest quality recording would be made using a stand-alone hard disc recorder, an independent mixer to attenuate the incoming signal, and insulated wiring combined with a high quality microphone in an anechoic chamber or sound treated room.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The position of the recording device has a strong impact on the captured audio.
“The position of the recording device also has a strong impact on the captured audio.18,20”
From Challenges of developing a digital scribe to reduce clinical documentation burden (2019) · cites this paper as [18]
A recording made in a real clinical setting is likely to include noise and other environmental conditions that negatively affect ASR.
“A recording made in a real clinical setting is likely to include noise and other environmental conditions that negatively affect ASR.18,19”
From Challenges of developing a digital scribe to reduce clinical documentation burden (2019) · cites this paper as [18]
Cites
Speech during sustained operations.
Whitmore, J., & Fisher, S. (1996) · Speech Communication · doi:10.1016/s0167-6393(96)00044-1 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Challenges of developing a digital scribe to reduce clinical documentation burden
Quiroz, J. C., Laranjo, L., Kocaballi, A. B., Berkovsky, S., Rezazadegan, D., & Coiera, E. (2019) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-019-0190-1 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Monitoring change requires a rethink of assessment practices in voice and speech
Vogel, A. P., & Maruff, P. (2014) · Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology · doi:10.3109/14015439.2013.775332 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Self-citationDeveloping digital health technologies for frontotemporal degeneration
Nevler, N., Niehoff, D., Gleixner, A. M., Dodge, S., Vogel, A. P., Hill, D. L., Ducharme, S., Staffaroni, A. M., Yunusova, Y., Au, R., et al. (2025) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.70082 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Vogel, A. P., & Morgan, A. T.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute (AU)
- Venue
- International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 431-437
- ISSN
- 1441-7049 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-9507
- 1754-9515
- OpenAlex
- W2066695143
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Voice and Speech Disorders
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Keywords
- voice recording, microphone selection, environmental noise, analog-to-digital conversion, file formats, signal integrity, recording equipment, anechoic chamber, vocal acoustics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review