Cited by 61Voice and Speech DisordersSpeech and Audio ProcessingPhonetics and Phonology Research

Factors affecting the quality of sound recording for speech and voice analysis

Vogel, Adam P., Morgan, Angela T.·2009·International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology

Abstract

The importance and utility of objective evidence-based measurement of the voice is well documented. Therefore, greater consideration needs to be given to the factors that influence the quality of voice and speech recordings. This manuscript aims to bring together the many features that affect acoustically acquired voice and speech. Specifically, the paper considers the practical requirements of individual speech acquisition configurations through examining issues relating to hardware, software and microphone selection, the impact of environmental noise, analogue to digital conversion and file format as well as the acoustic measures resulting from varying levels of signal integrity. The type of recording environment required by a user is often dictated by a variety of clinical and experimental needs, including: the acoustic measures being investigated; portability of equipment; an individual's budget; and the expertise of the user. As the quality of recorded signals is influenced by many factors, awareness of these issues is essential. This paper aims to highlight the importance of these methodological considerations to those previously uninitiated with voice and speech acoustics. With current technology, the highest quality recording would be made using a stand-alone hard disc recorder, an independent mixer to attenuate the incoming signal, and insulated wiring combined with a high quality microphone in an anechoic chamber or sound treated room.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/17549500902822189

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vogel, A. P., & Morgan, A. T.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Murdoch Children's Research Institute (AU)
Venue
International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
Published
2009-01
Volume
11
Issue
6
Pages
431-437
ISSN
  • 1441-7049 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-9507
  • 1754-9515
OpenAlex
W2066695143
Cited by
61
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Voice and Speech Disorders
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
Keywords
voice recording, microphone selection, environmental noise, analog-to-digital conversion, file formats, signal integrity, recording equipment, anechoic chamber, vocal acoustics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review