Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,178

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Revision of the proposed classification criteria for juvenile idiopathic arthritis: Durban 1997

·2001·Classic Papers in Rheumatology

Abstract

For many years a united international classification for chronic childhood arthritis has been absent. The lack of consensus has led to difficulties in trial structure and data interpretation. The authors put forward the new ILAR classification in which the term JIA replaces JRA and JCA. The classification is based on clinical characteristics during the first 6 months of disease and divided into seven distinct categories. The ILAR classification aspires to define categories of arthritis that are clinically homogenous such that to a degree this may predict response to therapy and outcome. A detailed account of the new classification and possible pitfalls is given.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/9780203214237-62

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,178

Metadata

Venue
Classic Papers in Rheumatology
Publisher
CRC Press
Published
2001-12-06
Volume
25
Issue
10
Pages
124-125
OpenAlex
W107023457
Cited by
1,178
References
0
FWCI
129.29
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Revision of the proposed classification criteria for juvenile idiopathic arthritis: Durban 1997. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/9780203214237-62
The paper
Revision of the proposed classification criteria for juvenile idiopathic arthritis: Durban 1997. (2001). Classic Papers in Rheumatology. https://doi.org/10.3109/9780203214237-62

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.