The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Inducing multilingual text analysis tools via robust projection across aligned corpora
Open accessAbstract
This paper describes a system and set of algorithms for automatically inducing stand-alone monolingual part-of-speech taggers, base noun-phrase bracketers, named-entity taggers and morphological analyzers for an arbitrary foreign language. Case studies include French, Chinese, Czech and Spanish.Existing text analysis tools for English are applied to bilingual text corpora and their output projected onto the second language via statistically derived word alignments. Simple direct annotation projection is quite noisy, however, even with optimal alignments. Thus this paper presents noise-robust tagger, bracketer and lemmatizer training procedures capable of accurate system bootstrapping from noisy and incomplete initial projections.Performance of the induced stand-alone part-of-speech tagger applied to French achieves 96% core part-of-speech (POS) tag accuracy, and the corresponding induced noun-phrase bracketer exceeds 91% F-measure. The induced morphological analyzer achieves over 99% lemmatization accuracy on the complete French verbal system.This achievement is particularly noteworthy in that it required absolutely no hand-annotated training data in the given language, and virtually no language-specific knowledge or resources beyond raw text. Performance also significantly exceeds that obtained by direct annotation projection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Resnik, P., & Smith, N. A. (2003) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/089120103322711578 · Cited by 522
Improving Machine Translation Performance by Exploiting Non-Parallel Corpora
Munteanu, D. S., & Marcu, D. (2005) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/089120105775299168 · Cited by 391
Bootstrapping parsers via syntactic projection across parallel texts
HWA, R., RESNIK, P., WEINBERG, A., CABEZAS, C., & KOLAK, O. (2005) · Natural Language Engineering · doi:10.1017/s1351324905003840 · Cited by 340
Challenges and Strategies in Cross-Cultural NLP
Hershcovich, D., Frank, S., Lent, H., de Lhoneux, M., Abdou, M., Brandl, S., Bugliarello, E., Cabello Piqueras, L., Chalkidis, I., Cui, R., et al. (2022) · Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.482 · Cited by 99
What Kind of Language Is Hard to Language-Model?
Mielke, S. J., Cotterell, R., Gorman, K., Roark, B., & Eisner, J. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1491 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Yarowsky, D., Ngai, G., & Wicentowski, R.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the first international conference on Human language technology research - HLT '01
- Published
- 2001
- Pages
- 1-8
- OpenAlex
- W2016630033
- Cited by
- 482
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.27
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inducing multilingual text analysis tools via robust projection across aligned corpora. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3115/1072133.1072187
- The paper
- Yarowsky, D., Ngai, G., & Wicentowski, R. (2001). Inducing multilingual text analysis tools via robust projection across aligned corpora. Proceedings of the first international conference on Human language technology research - HLT '01. https://doi.org/10.3115/1072133.1072187
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.