The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A phrase-based, joint probability model for statistical machine translation
Open accessAbstract
We present a joint probability model for statistical machine translation, which automatically learns word and phrase equivalents from bilingual corpora. Translations produced with parameters estimated using the joint model are more accurate than translations produced using IBM Model 4.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444
The mathematics of statistical machine translation: parameter estimation
Brown, P. F., Pietra, V. J. D., Pietra, S. A. D., & Mercer, R. L. (1993) · Cited by 3,973
A syntax-based statistical translation model
Yamada, K., & Knight, K. (2001) · Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics - ACL '01 · doi:10.3115/1073012.1073079 · Cited by 728
Statistical language modeling using the CMU-cambridge toolkit
Clarkson, P., & Rosenfeld, R. (1997) · 5th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (Eurospeech 1997) · doi:10.21437/eurospeech.1997-683 · Cited by 563
Improved Alignment Models for Statistical Machine Translation
Och, F. J., Tillmann, C., & Ney, H. (1999) · Cited by 478
Fast decoding and optimal decoding for machine translation
Germann, U., Jahr, M., Knight, K., Marcu, D., & Yamada, K. (2001) · Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics - ACL '01 · doi:10.3115/1073012.1073042 · Cited by 235
Self-citationEmpirical Methods for Exploiting Parallel Texts
Melamed, I. D. (2001) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/2708.001.0001 · Cited by 146
Papineni, K., Roukos, S., Ward, T., et al. (2002) · Cited by 41
Empirical Methods for Exploiting Parallel Texts
Tufis, D. (2002) · Literary and Linguistic Computing · doi:10.1093/llc/17.3.368 · Cited by 24
Cited by
Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder–Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation
Cho, K., van Merrienboer, B., Gulcehre, C., Bahdanau, D., Bougares, F., Schwenk, H., & Bengio, Y. (2014) · Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1179 · Cited by 25,545
Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation
Cho, K., van Merrienboer, B., Gulcehre, C., Bahdanau, D., Bougares, F., Schwenk, H., & Bengio, Y. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1406.1078 · Cited by 3,317
Paraphrasing with bilingual parallel corpora
Bannard, C., & Callison-Burch, C. (2005) · Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics - ACL '05 · doi:10.3115/1219840.1219914 · Cited by 533
Metadata
- Authors
- Marcu, D., & Wong, W.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the ACL-02 conference on Empirical methods in natural language processing - EMNLP '02
- Published
- 2002
- Volume
- 10
- Pages
- 133-139
- OpenAlex
- W2161792612
- Cited by
- 470
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 22.02
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A phrase-based, joint probability model for statistical machine translation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3115/1118693.1118711
- The paper
- Marcu, D., & Wong, W. (2002). A phrase-based, joint probability model for statistical machine translation. Proceedings of the ACL-02 conference on Empirical methods in natural language processing - EMNLP '02. https://doi.org/10.3115/1118693.1118711
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.