Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 957

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A stochastic parts program and noun phrase parser for unrestricted text

Open access
Church, Kenneth Ward·1988·Proceedings of the second conference on Applied natural language processing -

Abstract

alice!k-wcIt is well-known that part of speech depends on context.The word "table," for example, can be a verb in some contexts (e.g., "He will table the motion") and a noun in others (e.g., "The table is ready").A program has been written which tags each word in an input sentence with the most likely part of speech.The program produces the following output for the two "table" sentences just mentioned:• He/PPS will/lVlD table/VB the/AT motion/NN ./.• The/AT table]NN is/BEZ ready/J/./.(PPS = subject pronoun; MD = modal; V'B = verb (no inflection); AT = article; NN = noun; BEZ ffi present 3rd sg form of "to be"; Jl = adjective; notation is borrowed from [Francis and Kucera, pp.6-8])Part of speech tagging is an important practical problem with potential applications in many areas including speech synthesis, speech recognition, spelling correction, proof-reading, query answering, machine translation and searching large text data bases (e.g., patents, newspapers).The author is particularly interested in speech synthesis applications, where it is clear that pronunciation sometimes depends on part of speech.Consider the foUowing three examples where pronunciation depends on part of speech.First, there are words like "wind" where the noun has a different vowel than the verb.That is, the noun "wind" has a short vowel as in "the wind is strong," whereas the verb "wind" has a long vowel as in "Don't forget to wind your watch."Secondly, the pronoun "that" is stressed as in "Did you see THAT?" unlike the complementizer "that," as in "It is a shame that he's leaving."Thirdly, note the difference between "oily FLUID" and "TRANSMISSION fluid"; as a general rule, an adjective-noun sequence such as "oily FLUID" is typically stressed on the fight whereas a noun-noun sequence such as "TRANSMISSION fluid" is typically stressed on the left.These are but three of the many constructions which would sound more natural if the synthesizer had access to accurate part of speech information.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3115/974235.974260

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 957

Metadata

Authors
Church, K. W.
Venue
Proceedings of the second conference on Applied natural language processing -
Published
1988
Pages
136
OpenAlex
W2061271742
Cited by
957
References
5
FWCI
16.33
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A stochastic parts program and noun phrase parser for unrestricted text. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3115/974235.974260
The paper
Church, K. W. (1988). A stochastic parts program and noun phrase parser for unrestricted text. Proceedings of the second conference on Applied natural language processing -. https://doi.org/10.3115/974235.974260

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.