Cited by 1,094Natural Language Processing TechniquesLexicography and Language Studieslinguistics and terminology studies

Word association norms, mutual information, and lexicography

Open access
Church, Kenneth Ward, Hanks, Patrick·1989·Proceedings of the 27th annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics -

Abstract

The term word assaciation is used in a very particular sense in the psycholinguistic literature.(Generally speaking, subjects respond quicker than normal to the word "nurse" if it follows a highly associated word such as "doctor.")We wilt extend the term to provide the basis for a statistical description of a variety of interesting linguistic phenomena, ranging from semantic relations of the doctor/nurse type (content word/content word) to lexico-syntactic co-occurrence constraints between verbs and prepositions (content word/function word).This paper will propose a new objective measure based on the information theoretic notion of mutual information, for estimating word association norms from computer readable corpora.(The standard method of obtaining word association norms, testing a few thousand subjects on a few hundred words, is both costly and unreliable.)The , proposed measure, the association ratio, estimates word association norms directly from computer readable corpora, waki,~g it possible to estimate norms for tens of thousands of words. I. Meaning and AssociationIt is common practice in linguistics to classify words not only on the basis of their meanings but also on the basis of their co-occurrence with other words.Running through the whole Firthian tradition, for example, is the theme that "You shall know a word by the company it keeps" (Firth, 1957)."On the one hand, bank ¢o.occors with words and expression such u money, nmu.loan, account, ~m.c~z~c.o~.ctal, manager, robbery, vaults, wortln# in a, lu action, Fb~Nadonal. of F.ngland, and so forth.On the other hand, we find bank m-occorring with r~r.~bn, boa:.am (end of course West and Sou~, which have tcqu/red special meanings of their own), on top of the, and of the Rhine.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3115/981623.981633

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The form of contrastive perplexity is equivalent to conditional pointwise mutual information.

    “Finally, we observe that the form of contrastive perplexity is equivalent to conditional pointwise mutual information (Church and Hanks, 1989).”

    From LongLLMLingua: Accelerating and Enhancing LLMs in Long Context Scenarios via Prompt Compression (2024) · cites this paper as Church and Hanks, 1989

    Section 4, “An Information Theoretic Measure,” introduces mutual information for pairs of words, and the following section describes its comparison of joint and independent probabilities. Our copy does not discuss contrastive perplexity or conditional pointwise mutual information, so it cannot verify the claimed equivalence. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Church, K., (1988), "A Stochastic Pans Program and Noun Phrase Parser for Unrestricted Text," Second Conference on AppU~ Natural Language Processing, Austin, Texas.
  2. Fano, R., (1961), Tranamlx~n of Information, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massechusens.
  3. Firth, J., (1957), "A Synopsis of Linguistic Theory 1930-1955" in Smdiea in l.AnguLvd¢ Analysis, Philological Society, Oxford; reprinted in Palmer, F., (ed. 1968), Selected Papers Of J.R. Firth, Longman, Httlow.
  4. Good, I. J., (1953), The Population Frequemctea of Species and the F..tttnmrlan of Population Parametera, Biomelxika, Vol. 40, pp, 237-264.
  5. Hindle, D., (1983a), "Deterministic Parsing of Syntactic Non- fluancks," ACL Proceedings.
  6. Hornby, A., (1948), The Advanced Learner's D/cn'onary, Oxford Univenity Press.
  7. Kahaa, $., Pavlidis, T., and Baird, H., (1987) "On the Recognition of Printed Characters of any Font or She," IEEE Transections PAMI, pp. 274-287.
  8. Meyer, D., Schvaneveldt, R.. and Ruddy, M., (1975), "Loci of Contextual Effects on Visual Word-Reoognition," in Rabbin, P., and Domic, S., (ads.), Attention and Performance V, Academic Press, London, New York, San PrantAwo.
  9. Pakn-mo, D,, and Jenkins, J., (1964) "Word Asr,~:iation Norms," University of Minnesota Press, Minn~po~.
  10. Sinclair, J., (lgSTo), "The Nature of the Evidence," in Sinclair, J. (ed.), Looking Up: an account of the COBUILD Project in lexical co.orang, Collins, London and Glasgow.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Church, K. W., & Hanks, P.
Affiliations
  • AT&T (United States) (US)
  • Portuguese Air Transportations (Portugal) (PT)
Venue
Proceedings of the 27th annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics -
Published
1989
Pages
76-83
ISSN
0736-587X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2159637323
Cited by
1,094
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 80 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 62 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 39
FWCI
5.67
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting (publishedVersion)
  • OLAC - Open Language Archives Community (submittedVersion)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Lexicography and Language Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › linguistics and terminology studies
Keywords
word association norms, mutual information, lexicography, word co-occurrence, semantic relations, content words, function words

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review