Cited by 30Speech and dialogue systemsEmotion and Mood RecognitionIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning

Facilitating Multi-turn Emotional Support Conversation with Positive Emotion Elicitation: A Reinforcement Learning Approach

Open access
Zhou, Jinfeng, Chen, Zhuang, Wang, Bo, Huang, Minlie·2023·Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)

Abstract

Emotional support conversation (ESC) aims to provide emotional support (ES) to improve one's mental state.Existing works stay at fitting grounded responses and responding strategies (e.g., question), which ignore the effect on ES and lack explicit goals to guide emotional positive transition.To this end, we introduce a new paradigm to formalize multi-turn ESC as a process of positive emotion elicitation.Addressing this task requires finely adjusting the elicitation intensity in ES as the conversation progresses while maintaining conversational goals like coherence.In this paper, we propose SUPPORTER, a mixture-of-expert-based reinforcement learning model, and well design ES and dialogue coherence rewards to guide policy's learning for responding.Experiments verify the superiority of SUPPORTER in achieving positive emotion elicitation during responding while maintaining conversational goals including coherence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.96

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing agents-based LLMs are still incompetent in accomplishing social goals, e.g., rethinking the past conversation and establishing long-term connections with humans.

    “Despite their great success, existing agentsbased LLMs are still incompetent in accomplishing social goals (Zhou et al., 2023), e.g., rethinking the past conversation and establishing long-term connections with humans.”

    From Recursively summarizing enables long-term dialogue memory in large language models (2025) · cites this paper as Zhou et al., 2023

    The Introduction says existing emotional-support conversation systems lack explicit goals for improving a user's mental state across multiple turns. That supports a narrower claim about a social goal in emotional-support dialogue, but not the broader claim about agent-based LLMs or the examples of rethinking past conversations and establishing long-term human connections. The indexed passages provide section labels but no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Nurul Lubis, Sakriani Sakti, Koichiro Yoshino, and Satoshi Nakamura. 2019a. Dialogue model and re- sponse generation for emotion improvement elici- tation. In Proc. 33rd Conf. Neural Inf. Process. Syst.(NIPS), pages 1-11.
  2. Richard S Sutton and Andrew G Barto. 2018. Reinforce- ment learning: An introduction. MIT press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhou, J., Chen, Z., Wang, B., & Huang, M.
Affiliations
  • Tianjin University (CN)
  • State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Technology and Systems (CN)
Venue
Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)
Published
2023
Pages
1714-1729
ISSN
0736-587X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4385569827
Cited by
25
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11
FWCI
4.43
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (62276187, 62272340, 61876128)
  • Tsinghua University
  • National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (62125604)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Keywords
emotional support conversation, multi-turn dialogue, mixture of experts, dialogue coherence, chatbots

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review