The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Incorporating Vector Space Similarity in Random Walk Inference over Knowledge Bases
Open accessAbstract
Much work in recent years has gone into the construction of large knowledge bases (KBs), such as Freebase, DBPedia, NELL, and YAGO.While these KBs are very large, they are still very incomplete, necessitating the use of inference to fill in gaps.Prior work has shown how to make use of a large text corpus to augment random walk inference over KBs.We present two improvements to the use of such large corpora to augment KB inference.First, we present a new technique for combining KB relations and surface text into a single graph representation that is much more compact than graphs used in prior work.Second, we describe how to incorporate vector space similarity into random walk inference over KBs, reducing the feature sparsity inherent in using surface text.This allows us to combine distributional similarity with symbolic logical inference in novel and effective ways.With experiments on many relations from two separate KBs, we show that our methods significantly outperform prior work on KB inference, both in the size of problem our methods can handle and in the quality of predictions made.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Different from those studies using path ranking algorithm for KG completion (Lao et al., 2011;Gardner et al., 2014;Mazumder and Liu, 2017;Das et al., 2018), which leverage the entities and relations in the KG for path reasoning, our path ranking model additionally considers the relation phrase in the question for ranking.”
From Implicit Relation Linking for Question Answering over Knowledge Graph (2022) · cites this paper as Gardner et al., 2014
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Recursive Deep Models for Semantic Compositionality Over a Sentiment Treebank
Socher, R., Perelygin, A., Wu, J., Chuang, J., Manning, C. D., Ng, A., & Potts, C. (2013) · Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d13-1170 · Cited by 6,878
Freebase: a collaboratively created graph database for structuring human knowledge
Bollacker, K., Evans, C., Paritosh, P., Sturge, T., & Taylor, J. (2008) · Proceedings of the 2008 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data · doi:10.1145/1376616.1376746 · Cited by 4,852
Yago: a core of semantic knowledge
Suchanek, F. M., Kasneci, G., & Weikum, G. (2007) · Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/1242572.1242667 · Cited by 2,512
Toward an architecture for never-ending language learning
Carlson, A., Betteridge, J., Kisiel, B., Settles, B., Hruschka, E., & Mitchell, T. (2010) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v24i1.7519 · Cited by 2,000
Self-citationLenat, D. B. (1995) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/219717.219745 · Cited by 1,966
ConceptNet — A Practical Commonsense Reasoning Tool-Kit
Liu, H., & Singh, P. (2004) · BT Technology Journal · doi:10.1023/b:bttj.0000047600.45421.6d · Cited by 1,570
GraphChi: Large-Scale Graph Computation on Just a PC
Kyrola, A., Blelloch, G. E., & Guestrin, C. (2018) · Figshare · doi:10.1184/r1/6605999 · Cited by 868
Parsing with Compositional Vector Grammars
Socher, R., Bauer, J., Manning, C. D., & Ng, A. Y. (2013) · Cited by 830
Open Language Learning for Information Extraction
Schmitz, M., Soderland, S. G., Bart, R., & Etzioni, O. (2012) · Cited by 694
Relational retrieval using a combination of path-constrained random walks
Lao, N., & Cohen, W. W. (2010) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-010-5205-8 · Cited by 616
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Douglas B Lenat. 1995. Cyc: A large-scale investment in knowledge infrastructure. Communications of the ACM, 38(11):33-38.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Survey on Knowledge Graphs: Representation, Acquisition, and Applications
Ji, S., Pan, S., Cambria, E., Marttinen, P., & Yu, P. S. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2021.3070843 · Cited by 2,947
Observed versus latent features for knowledge base and text inference
Toutanova, K., & Chen, D. (2015) · Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Continuous Vector Space Models and their Compositionality · doi:10.18653/v1/w15-4007 · Cited by 1,070
A review: Knowledge reasoning over knowledge graph
Chen, X., Jia, S., & Xiang, Y. (2020) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112948 · Cited by 1,035
DeepPath: A Reinforcement Learning Method for Knowledge Graph Reasoning
Xiong, W., Hoang, T., & Wang, W. Y. (2017) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d17-1060 · Cited by 953
Representing Text for Joint Embedding of Text and Knowledge Bases
Toutanova, K., Chen, D., Pantel, P., Poon, H., Choudhury, P., & Gamon, M. (2015) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d15-1174 · Cited by 827
Mitchell, T. M., Cohen, W. W., Junior, E. R. H., Talukdar, P. P., Yang, B., Betteridge, J., Carlson, A., Dalvi, B. B., Gardner, M., Kisiel, B., et al. (2018) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3191513 · Cited by 549
Self-citationXia, F., Sun, K., Yu, S., Aziz, A., Wan, L., Pan, S., & Liu, H. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tai.2021.3076021 · Cited by 534
Differentiable Learning of Logical Rules for Knowledge Base ReasoningPreprint
Yang, F., Yang, Z., & Cohen, W. W. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1702.08367 · Cited by 434
A Comprehensive Survey on Automatic Knowledge Graph Construction
Zhong, L., Wu, J. X., Li, Q., Peng, H., & Wu, X. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3618295 · Cited by 494
A Survey of Knowledge Graph Reasoning on Graph Types: Static, Dynamic, and Multi-Modal
Liang, K., Meng, L., Liu, M., Liu, Y., Tu, W., Wang, S., Zhou, S., Liu, X., Sun, F., & He, K. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2024.3417451 · Cited by 438
Traversing Knowledge Graphs in Vector Space
Guu, K., Miller, J., & Liang, P. (2015) · Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d15-1038 · Cited by 319
Leveraging Knowledge Bases in LSTMs for Improving Machine Reading
Yang, B., & Mitchell, T. (2017) · Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p17-1132 · Cited by 261
Self-citationCompositional Vector Space Models for Knowledge Base Completion
Neelakantan, A., Roth, B., & McCallum, A. (2015) · doi:10.3115/v1/p15-1016 · Cited by 254
Efficient and Expressive Knowledge Base Completion Using Subgraph Feature Extraction
Gardner, M., & Mitchell, T. M. (2015) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d15-1173 · Cited by 181
Self-citationCommonsense Knowledge Base Completion
Li, X., Taheri, A., Tu, L., & Gimpel, K. (2016) · Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p16-1137 · Cited by 166
A comprehensive overview of knowledge graph completion
Shen, T., Zhang, F., & Cheng, J. (2022) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2022.109597 · Cited by 171
Improving Information Extraction by Acquiring External Evidence with Reinforcement Learning
Narasimhan, K., Yala, A., & Barzilay, R. (2016) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1261 · Cited by 146
Compositional Learning of Embeddings for Relation Paths in Knowledge Base and Text
Toutanova, K., Lin, V., Yih, W.-T., Poon, H., & Quirk, C. (2016) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p16-1136 · Cited by 148
On the Explainability of Natural Language Processing Deep Models
Zini, J. E., & Awad, M. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3529755 · Cited by 153
Variational Knowledge Graph Reasoning
Chen, W., Xiong, W., Yan, X., & Wang, W. Y. (2018) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1165 · Cited by 134
End-to-End Differentiable ProvingPreprint
Rocktäschel, T., & Riedel, S. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1705.11040 · Cited by 152
Neural Approaches to Conversational AI
Gao, J., Galley, M., & Li, L. (2019) · now publishers, Inc. eBooks · doi:10.1561/9781680835533 · Cited by 125
Multilingual Relation Extraction using Compositional Universal Schema
Verga, P. W., Belanger, D., Strubell, E., Roth, B., & McCallum, A. (2016) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/n16-1103 · Cited by 101
MRGAT: Multi-Relational Graph Attention Network for knowledge graph completion
Dai, G., Wang, X., Zou, X., Liu, C., & Cen, S. (2022) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2022.07.014 · Cited by 98
Compositional Vector Space Models for Knowledge Base CompletionPreprint
Neelakantan, A., Roth, B., & McCallum, A. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1504.06662 · Cited by 112
Knowledge Base Completion via Coupled Path Ranking
Wang, Q., Liu, J., Luo, Y., Wang, B., & Lin, C.-Y. (2016) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p16-1124 · Cited by 79
Differentiable Reasoning on Large Knowledge Bases and Natural Language
Minervini, P., Bošnjak, M., Rocktäschel, T., Riedel, S., & Grefenstette, E. (2020) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v34i04.5962 · Cited by 71
García-Durán, A., & Niepert, M. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1709.04676 · Cited by 89
UHop: An Unrestricted-Hop Relation Extraction Framework for Knowledge-Based Question AnsweringPreprint
Chen, Z., Chang, C.-H., Chen, Y.-P., Nayak, J., & Ku, L. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1904.01246 · Cited by 65
Scene Graph Prediction with Limited Labels
Chen, V. S., Varma, P., Krishna, R., Bernstein, M. S., Ré, C., & Fei-Fei, L. (2019) · IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops · doi:10.1109/iccvw.2019.00220 · Cited by 64
An overview of embedding models of entities and relationships for knowledge base completion.Preprint
Nguyen, D. Q. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 61
TensorLog: A Probabilistic Database Implemented Using Deep-Learning Infrastructure
Cohen, W. W., Yang, F., & Mazaitis, K. (2020) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.1.11944 · Cited by 100
A survey of embedding models of entities and relationships for knowledge graph completion
Nguyen, D. Q. (2020) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.textgraphs-1.1 · Cited by 86
GRL: Knowledge graph completion with GAN-based reinforcement learning
Wang, Q., Ji, Y., Hao, Y., & Cao, J. (2020) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2020.106421 · Cited by 51
Combining Two and Three-Way Embedding Models for Link Prediction in Knowledge Bases
García-Durán, A., Bordes, A., Usunier, N., & Grandvalet, Y. (2016) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.5013 · Cited by 64
Contrastive Multi-Modal Knowledge Graph Representation Learning
Fang, Q., Zhang, X., Hu, J., Wu, X., & Xu, C. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2022.3220625 · Cited by 48
Chen, L., Cui, J., Tang, X., Qian, Y., Li, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2021) · Applied Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s10489-021-02672-0 · Cited by 43
Neural Approaches to Conversational AI
Gao, J., Galley, M., & Li, L. (2019) · Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval · doi:10.1561/1500000074 · Cited by 424
Neural-Symbolic Methods for Knowledge Graph Reasoning: A Survey
Cheng, K., Ahmed, N. K., Rossi, R. A., Willke, T. L., & Sun, Y. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data · doi:10.1145/3686806 · Cited by 50
Khan, N., Ma, Z., Ullah, A., & Polat, K. (2022) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117737 · Cited by 40
Dynamically Pruned Message Passing Networks for Large-Scale Knowledge Graph ReasoningPreprint
Xu, X., Feng, W., Jiang, Y., Xie, X., Sun, Z., & Deng, Z. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1909.11334 · Cited by 39
Path Reasoning over Knowledge Graph: A Multi-agent and Reinforcement Learning Based Method
Li, Z., Jin, X., Guan, S., Wang, Y., & Cheng, X. (2018) · IEEE ... International Conference on Data Mining workshops · doi:10.1109/icdmw.2018.00135 · Cited by 36
Wang, X., Wang, Y., Yang, J., Jia, X., Li, L., Ding, W., & Wang, F. (2024) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2024.102321 · Cited by 42
Learning Relational Features with Backward Random Walks
Lao, N., Minkov, E., & Cohen, W. W. (2015) · doi:10.3115/v1/p15-1065 · Cited by 39
DIVINE: A Generative Adversarial Imitation Learning Framework for Knowledge Graph Reasoning
Li, R., & Cheng, X. (2019) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1266 · Cited by 36
Context-aware Path Ranking for Knowledge Base Completion
Mazumder, S., & Liu, B. (2017) · Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2017/166 · Cited by 35
Scene Graph Prediction With Limited Labels
Krishna, R., Chen, V. S., Varma, P., Bernstein, M. S., Ré, C., & Fei-Fei, L. (2019) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00267 · Cited by 36
Explainable Link Prediction for Emerging Entities in Knowledge Graphs
Bhowmik, R., & de Melo, G. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-62419-4_3 · Cited by 43
Hierarchical graph attention network for temporal knowledge graph reasoning
Shao, P., He, J., Li, G., Zhang, D., & Tao, J. (2023) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2023.126390 · Cited by 34
Hierarchical Random Walk Inference in Knowledge Graphs
Liu, Q., Jiang, L., Minghao, H., Liu, Y., & Qin, Z. (2016) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/2911451.2911509 · Cited by 32
Karagiannis, G., Saeed, M., Papotti, P., & Trummer, I. (2020) · Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment · doi:10.14778/3407790.3407841 · Cited by 36
Reliable Knowledge Graph Path Representation Learning
Seo, S., Oh, B., & Lee, K.-H. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2973923 · Cited by 30
A Benchmark for Fact Checking Algorithms Built on Knowledge Bases
Huynh, V.-P., & Papotti, P. (2019) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3357384.3358036 · Cited by 27
ABLE: Meta-Path Prediction in Heterogeneous Information Networks
Huang, C., Fang, Y., Lin, X., Cao, X., & Zhang, W. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data · doi:10.1145/3494558 · Cited by 26
M2KGRL: A semantic-matching based framework for multimodal knowledge graph representation learning
Chen, T., Wang, T., Zhang, H., & Xu, J. (2025) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2025.126388 · Cited by 26
UHop: An Unrestricted-Hop Relation Extraction Framework for Knowledge-Based Question Answering
Chen, Z., Chang, C.-H., Chen, Y.-P., Nayak, J., & Ku, L. (2019) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1031 · Cited by 100
Verga, P. W., & McCallum, A. (2016) · Automated Knowledge Base Construction · doi:10.18653/v1/w16-1312 · Cited by 25
Lifelong and Interactive Learning of Factual Knowledge in Dialogues
Mazumder, S., Liu, B., Wang, S., & Ma, N. (2019) · Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue · doi:10.18653/v1/w19-5903 · Cited by 25
Knowledge graph embedding for hyper-relational data
Zhang, C., Zhou, M., Xiao, H., Hu, Z., & Ji, Y. (2017) · Tsinghua Science & Technology · doi:10.23919/tst.2017.7889640 · Cited by 24
Zupanc, K., & Davis, J. J. (2018) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3178876.3186006 · Cited by 25
Chen, C., Zheng, F., Cui, J., Cao, Y., Liu, G., Wu, J. X., & Zhou, J. (2024) · International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/s13042-024-02106-6 · Cited by 34
Hybrid reasoning in knowledge graphs: Combing symbolic reasoning and statistical reasoning
Li, W., Qi, G., & Ji, Q. (2020) · Semantic Web · doi:10.3233/sw-190375 · Cited by 25
Inductive Meta-Path Learning for Schema-Complex Heterogeneous Information Networks
Liu, S., Fan, C., Cheng, K., Wang, Y., Cui, P., Sun, Y., & Liu, Z. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2024.3435055 · Cited by 25
Krause, S., Hennig, L., Moro, A., Weissenborn, D., Xu, F., Uszkoreit, H., & Roberto Navigli, A. (2016) · Journal of Web Semantics · doi:10.1016/j.websem.2016.03.004 · Cited by 22
Yang, J., Yang, L. T., Wang, H., Gao, Y., Zhao, Y., Xie, X., & Lü, Y. (2022) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2022.09.003 · Cited by 18
Cross-Domain Aspect Extraction using Transformers Augmented with Knowledge Graphs
Howard, P., Ma, A., Lal, V., Simoes, A. P., Korat, D., Pereg, O., Wasserblat, M., & Singer, G. (2022) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3511808.3557275 · Cited by 20
HybridFC: A Hybrid Fact-Checking Approach for Knowledge Graphs
Qudus, U., Röder, M., Saleem, M., & Ngomo, A.-C. N. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-19433-7_27 · Cited by 18
Unsupervised Embedding Enhancements of Knowledge Graphs using Textual Associations
Veira, N., Keng, B., Padmanabhan, K., & Veneris, A. G. (2019) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2019/725 · Cited by 19
Borrego, A., Ayala, D., Hernández, I., Rivero, C. R., & Ruiz, D. (2019) · International Conference on Knowledge Capture · doi:10.1145/3360901.3364418 · Cited by 18
Embedding Uncertain Temporal Knowledge Graphs
Li, T., Wang, W., Li, X., Wang, T., Zhou, X., & Huang, M. (2023) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math11030775 · Cited by 18
Neural-Symbolic Reasoning over Knowledge Graphs: A Survey from a Query Perspective
Liu, L., Wang, Z., & Tong, H. (2025) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/3748239.3748249 · Cited by 31
Path-based reasoning with constrained type attention for knowledge graph completion
Lei, K., Zhang, J., Xie, Y., Wen, D., Chen, D., Yang, M., & Shen, Y. (2019) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-019-04181-1 · Cited by 18
Towards a Benchmark for Fact Checking with Knowledge Bases
Huynh, V.-P., & Papotti, P. (2018) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3184558.3191616 · Cited by 16
ReinforceWalk: Learning to Walk in Graph with Monte Carlo Tree SearchPreprint
Shen, Y., Chen, J., Huang, P.-S., Guo, Y., & Gao, J. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 15
Combining Vector Space Embeddings with Symbolic Logical Inference over Open-Domain Text.
Gardner, M., Talukdar, P. P., & Mitchell, T. M. (2015) · Cited by 15
Self-citationVariational Knowledge Graph ReasoningPreprint
Chen, W., Xiong, W., Yan, X., & Wang, W. Y. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1803.06581 · Cited by 15
SeVeN: Augmenting Word Embeddings with Unsupervised Relation VectorsPreprint
Espinosa-Anke, L., & Schockaert, S. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1808.06068 · Cited by 17
An Entity-centric Approach for Overcoming Knowledge Graph Sparsity
Hegde, M., & Talukdar, P. P. (2015) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d15-1061 · Cited by 14
Self-citationTo hop or not, that is the question: Towards effective multi-hop reasoning over knowledge graphs
Liao, J., Zhao, X. H., Tang, J., Zeng, W., & Tan, Z. (2021) · World Wide Web · doi:10.1007/s11280-021-00911-5 · Cited by 12
Kou, Z., Zhang, Y., Zhang, D., & Wang, D. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3555178 · Cited by 12
HEER: Heterogeneous graph embedding for emerging relation detection from news
Zhang, J., Lu, C.-T., Zhou, M., Xie, S., Chang, Y., & Yu, P. S. (2016) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata.2016.7840673 · Cited by 13
Modeling Paths for Explainable Knowledge Base Completion
Stadelmaier, J., & Padó, S. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 ACL Workshop BlackboxNLP: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP · doi:10.18653/v1/w19-4816 · Cited by 12
Differentiable Reasoning on Large Knowledge Bases and Natural Language
Minervini, P., Bošnjak, M., Rocktäschel, T., Riedel, S., & Grefenstette, E. (2020) · Studies on the semantic web · doi:10.3233/ssw200015 · Cited by 12
Research progress of large-scale knowledge graph completion technology
Du, Z., Meng, X., & Wang, S. (2020) · Scientia Sinica Informationis · doi:10.1360/n112018-00225 · Cited by 12
Understanding the Semantic Content of Sparse Word Embeddings Using a Commonsense Knowledge Base
Balogh, V., Berend, G., Diochnos, D. I., & Turán, G. (2020) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v34i05.6235 · Cited by 11
Zhang, M., Geng, G., Zeng, S., & Jia, H. (2020) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e22101168 · Cited by 14
Open-Vocabulary Semantic Parsing with both Distributional Statistics and Formal Knowledge
Gardner, M., & Krishnamurthy, J. (2017) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v31i1.10980 · Cited by 4
Self-citationKnowledge Graph Reasoning via Dynamic Subgraph Attention with Low Resource Computation
Wang, Y., Xia, N., Yu, H., & Luo, X. (2024) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2024.127866 · Cited by 10
Symbolic Learning and Reasoning With Noisy Data for Probabilistic Anchoring
Martires, P. Z. D., Kumar, N. D., Persson, A., Loutfi, A., & Raedt, L. D. (2020) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2020.00100 · Cited by 10
Mitchell, T. M., Cohen, W., Hruschka, E., Talukdar, P., Betteridge, J., Carlson, A., Mishra, B. D., Gardner, M., Kisiel, B., Krishnamurthy, J., et al. (2010) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1037/e660332010-001 · Cited by 13
Self-citationHOPLoP: multi-hop link prediction over knowledge graph embeddings
Ranganathan, V., & Barbosa, D. (2021) · World Wide Web · doi:10.1007/s11280-021-00972-6 · Cited by 10
Dynamic Generation of Knowledge Graph Supporting STEAM Learning Theme Design
Ke, Q., & Lin, J. (2022) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app122111001 · Cited by 10
Knowledge Base Completion Using Matrix Factorization
He, W., Feng, Y., Zou, L., & Zhao, D. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-25255-1_21 · Cited by 10
Automated Rule Base Completion as Bayesian Concept Induction
Bouraoui, Z., & Schockaert, S. (2019) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33016228 · Cited by 10
Knowledge graph reasoning: Mainstream methods, applications and prospects
Liu, H., Yang, S., Shi, G., & Miao, Z. (2025) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2025.111625 · Cited by 13
A review of background, methods, limitations and opportunities of knowledge graph completion
Li, D., Liang, Y., Qian, S., Wu, H., Jia, W., Fu, Y., & Sun, Y. (2025) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2025.100809 · Cited by 10
Predicting ConceptNet Path Quality Using Crowdsourced Assessments of Naturalness
Zhou, Y., Schockaert, S., & Shah, J. (2019) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3308558.3313486 · Cited by 10
Kuželka, O., & Davis, J. J. (2019) · Lirias · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Gardner, M., Talukdar, P., Krishnamurthy, J., & Mitchell, T.
- Affiliations
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
- Indian Institute of Science Bangalore (IN)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)
- Published
- 2014
- Pages
- 397-406
- OpenAlex
- W175897666
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 8.83
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- KiltHub Repository (submittedVersion)
- KiltHub Repository
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (FA8750-13-2-0005, FA8750)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Semantic Web and Ontologies
- Keywords
- knowledge base inference, random walks, knowledge base completion, graph representation, feature sparsity, distributional semantics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
