Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 635

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Question Answering with Subgraph Embeddings

Open access
Bordes, Antoine, Chopra, Sumit, Weston, Jason·2014·Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)

Abstract

This paper presents a system which learns to answer questions on a broad range of topics from a knowledge base using few hand-crafted features.Our model learns low-dimensional embeddings of words and knowledge base constituents; these representations are used to score natural language questions against candidate answers.Training our system using pairs of questions and structured representations of their answers, and pairs of question paraphrases, yields competitive results on a recent benchmark of the literature.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3115/v1/d14-1067

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 635

Metadata

Authors
Bordes, A., Chopra, S., & Weston, J.
Venue
Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)
Published
2014
Pages
615-620
OpenAlex
W1894439495
Cited by
635
References
0
FWCI
23.91
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Question Answering with Subgraph Embeddings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3115/v1/d14-1067
The paper
Bordes, A., Chopra, S., & Weston, J. (2014). Question Answering with Subgraph Embeddings. Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/d14-1067

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.