Cited by 395Topic ModelingInformation Retrieval and Search BehaviorDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Representation Learning Using Multi-Task Deep Neural Networks for Semantic Classification and Information Retrieval

Open access
Liu, Xiaodong, Gao, Jianfeng, He, Xiaodong, Deng, Li, Duh, Kevin, Wang, Ye-Yi·2015·Proceedings of the 2015 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies

Abstract

Xiaodong Liu, Jianfeng Gao, Xiaodong He, Li Deng, Kevin Duh, Ye-yi Wang. Proceedings of the 2015 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 2015.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3115/v1/n15-1092

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MT-DNN achieved state-of-the-art performance on GLUE and other benchmarks when it was introduced.

    “This is the method used by the 'MT-DNN' (Liu et al., 2015, 2019b), which achieved state-of-the-art performance on GLUE and other benchmarks when it was introduced.”

    From Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer (2019) · cites this paper as Liu et al., 2015

    The available passages are bibliographic metadata for the 2015 paper (pp. 912–921), not its results. Searches for GLUE, MT-DNN, and state-of-the-art benchmark performance returned no passage addressing the claim, so our copy cannot verify it. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, X., Gao, J., He, X., Deng, L., Duh, K., & Wang, Y.-Y.
Affiliations
  • Nara Institute of Science and Technology (JP)
  • Microsoft (United States) (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2015 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies
Published
2015
Pages
912-921
OpenAlex
W2295072214
Cited by
395
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 80 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 7
FWCI
20.66
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Microsoft Research
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
representation learning, multi-task learning, deep neural network, semantic classification, information retrieval

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review