The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Stanford CoreNLP Natural Language Processing Toolkit
Open accessAbstract
Christopher Manning, Mihai Surdeanu, John Bauer, Jenny Finkel, Steven Bethard, David McClosky. Proceedings of 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations. 2014.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SUTime: A library for recognizing and normalizing time expressions
Chang, A. X., & Manning, C. (2012) · Proceedings of the Language Resources and Evaluation Conference · doi:10.63317/5pi53hxdrsdt · Cited by 383
Self-citation
Cited by
Items 101–137 of 137
AI-assisted automated scoring of picture-cued writing tasks for language assessment
Zhao, R., Zhuang, Y., Zou, D., Xie, Q., & Yu, P. L. H. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-022-11473-y · Cited by 40
Detecting Causal Language Use in Science Findings
Yu, B., Li, Y., & Wang, J. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1473 · Cited by 40
LyriSys: An Interactive Support System for Writing Lyrics Based on Topic Transition
Watanabe, K., Matsubayashi, Y., Inui, K., Nakano, T., Fukayama, S., & Goto, M. (2017) · Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces · doi:10.1145/3025171.3025194 · Cited by 34
Abstractive Timeline Summarization
Steen, J., & Markert, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on New Frontiers in Summarization · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-5403 · Cited by 34
Automatic Anonymization of Textual Documents: Detecting Sensitive Information via Word Embeddings
Hassan, F., Sanchez, D., Soria-Comas, J., & Domingo-Ferrer, J. (2019) · 2019 18th IEEE International Conference On Trust, Security And Privacy In Computing And Communications/13th IEEE International Conference On Big Data Science And Engineering (TrustCom/BigDataSE) · doi:10.1109/trustcom/bigdatase.2019.00055 · Cited by 34
“A theme-rewriting approach for generating algebra word problems,”
Koncel-Kedziorski, R., Konstas, I., Zettlemoyer, L., & Hajishirzi, H. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1168 · Cited by 30
Using NLP and Machine Learning to Detect Data Privacy Violations
Silva, P., Goncalves, C., Godinho, C., Antunes, N., & Curado, M. (2020) · IEEE INFOCOM 2020 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS) · doi:10.1109/infocomwkshps50562.2020.9162683 · Cited by 32
Korach, Z. T., Cato, K. D., Collins, S. A., Kang, M. J., Knaplund, C., Dykes, P. C., Wang, L., Schnock, K. O., Garcia, J. P., Jia, H., et al. (2019) · Applied Clinical Informatics · doi:10.1055/s-0039-3401814 · Cited by 32
Roostaee, M., Sadreddini, M. H., & Fakhrahmad, S. M. (2020) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2019.102150 · Cited by 31
Why Machine Reading Comprehension Models Learn Shortcuts?
Lai, Y., Zhang, C., Feng, Y., Huang, Q., & Zhao, D. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL-IJCNLP 2021 · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-acl.85 · Cited by 32
Identifying computer-generated text using statistical analysis
Nguyen-Son, H.-Q., Tieu, N.-D. T., Nguyen, H. H., Yamagishi, J., & Zen, I. E. (2017) · 2017 Asia-Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA ASC) · doi:10.1109/apsipa.2017.8282270 · Cited by 30
Exploring Platform Migration Patterns between Twitter and Mastodon: A User Behavior Study
Jeong, U., Sheth, P., Tahir, A., Alatawi, F., Bernard, H. R., & Liu, H. (2024) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v18i1.31348 · Cited by 34
Towards Evaluating Narrative Quality In Student Writing
Somasundaran, S., Flor, M., Chodorow, M., Molloy, H., Gyawali, B., & McCulla, L. (2018) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00007 · Cited by 29
(2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 29
Rhetorical Figure Detection: Chiasmus, Epanaphora, Epiphora
Dubremetz, M., & Nivre, J. (2018) · Frontiers in Digital Humanities · doi:10.3389/fdigh.2018.00010 · Cited by 27
Automated clinical knowledge graph generation framework for evidence based medicine.
Alam, F., Giglou, H. B., & Malik, K. M. (2023) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120964 · Cited by 27
Reliable Natural Language Understanding with Large Language Models and Answer Set Programming
Rajasekharan, A., Zeng, Y., Padalkar, P., & Gupta, G. (2023) · Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science · doi:10.4204/eptcs.385.27 · Cited by 26
Analysing concatenation approaches to document-level NMT in two different domains
Scherrer, Y., Tiedemann, J., & Loáiciga, S. (2019) · Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Discourse in Machine Translation (DiscoMT 2019) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-6506 · Cited by 26
Talk2Me: Automated linguistic data collection for personal assessment
Komeili, M., Pou-Prom, C., Liaqat, D., Fraser, K. C., Yancheva, M., & Rudzicz, F. (2019) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0212342 · Cited by 23
A structured distributional model of sentence meaning and processing
Chersoni, E., Santus, E., Pannitto, L., Lenci, A., Blache, P., & Huang, C.-R. (2019) · Natural Language Engineering · doi:10.1017/s1351324919000214 · Cited by 19
Voita, E., Sennrich, R., & Titov, I. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1909.01380 · Cited by 17
CS-KG 2.0: A Large-scale Knowledge Graph of Computer Science
Dessí, D., Osborne, F., Buscaldi, D., Reforgiato Recupero, D., & Motta, E. (2025) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-025-05200-8 · Cited by 17
(2021) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.108 · Cited by 16
emiRIT: a text-mining-based resource for microRNA information
Roychowdhury, D., Gupta, S., Qin, X., Arighi, C. N., & Vijay-Shanker, K. (2021) · Database · doi:10.1093/database/baab031 · Cited by 15
Extracting Semantic Relations for Scholarly Knowledge Base Construction
Al-Zaidy, R. A., & Giles, C. L. (2018) · 2018 IEEE 12th International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC) · doi:10.1109/icsc.2018.00017 · Cited by 15
Novice Reflections During the Transition to a New Programming Language
Denny, P., Becker, B. A., Bosch, N., Prather, J., Reeves, B., & Whalley, J. (2022) · Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education · doi:10.1145/3478431.3499314 · Cited by 11
The Topic Confusion Task: A Novel Evaluation Scenario for Authorship Attribution
Altakrori, M., Cheung, J. C. K., & Fung, B. C. M. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2021 · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-emnlp.359 · Cited by 11
A comparative study on lexical and syntactic features of ESL versus EFL learners’ writing
Zhang, C., & Kang, S. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1002090 · Cited by 11
LISA: Lexically Intelligent Story Assistant
Sanghrajka, R., Hidalgo, D., Chen, P., & Kapadia, M. (2017) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment · doi:10.1609/aiide.v13i1.12956 · Cited by 10
Li, Y., Kong, C., Zhao, G., & Zhao, Z. (2025) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-025-11337-0 · Cited by 7
Debate Helps Supervise Unreliable Experts
Michael, J., Mahdi, S., Rein, D., Petty, J., Dirani, J., Padmakumar, V., & Bowman, S. R. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.08702 · Cited by 8
Hoang, L., Jiang, L., & Kilicoglu, H. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.09.14.21263586 · Cited by 5
Azab, M., Dadian, S., Nastase, V., An, L., & Mihalcea, R. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1122 · Cited by 5
Predicting the Popularity of Micro-videos with Multimodal Variational Encoder-Decoder Framework
Zhu, Y., Xie, J., & Chen, Z. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2003.12724 · Cited by 5
Data-Driven Detection of General Chiasmi Using Lexical and Semantic Features
Schneider, F., Barz, B., Brandes, P., Marshall, S., & Denzler, J. (2021) · Proceedings of the 5th Joint SIGHUM Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Cultural Heritage, Social Sciences, Humanities and Literature · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.latechclfl-1.11 · Cited by 3
(2019) · IberLEF@SEPLN · Cited by 3
Stanza: A Python Natural Language Processing Toolkit for Many Human Languages
Qi, P., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., Bolton, J., & Manning, C. D. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2003.07082
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Manning, C., Surdeanu, M., Bauer, J., Finkel, J., Bethard, S., & McClosky, D.
- Venue
- Proceedings of 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations
- Published
- 2014
- Pages
- 55-60
- OpenAlex
- W2123442489
- Cited by
- 7,037
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 346.27
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
