Cited by 35Media and Digital CommunicationSocial Media and PoliticsComplex Network Analysis Techniques

Exploring Platform Migration Patterns between Twitter and Mastodon: A User Behavior Study

Open access
Jeong, Ujun, Sheth, Paras, Tahir, Anique, Alatawi, Faisal, Bernard, H. Russell, Liu, Huan·2024·Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media

Abstract

A recent surge of users migrating from Twitter to alternative platforms, such as Mastodon, raised questions regarding what migration patterns are, how different platforms impact user behaviors, and how migrated users settle in the migration process. In this study, we elaborate on how we investigate these questions by collecting data over 10,000 users who migrated from Twitter to Mastodon within the first ten weeks following the ownership change of Twitter. Our research is structured in three primary steps. First, we develop algorithms to extract and analyze migration patterns. Second, by leveraging behavioral analysis, we examine the distinct architectures of Twitter and Mastodon to learn how user behaviors correspond with the characteristics of each platform. Last, we determine how particular behavioral factors influence users to stay on Mastodon. We share our findings of user migration, insights, and lessons learned from the user behavior study.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1609/icwsm.v18i1.31348

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An alternative, decentralized paradigm for social media has emerged, primarily centered around protocols that seek to reconfigure how power is distributed across a network of actors.

    “In response, an alternative, decentralized paradigm for social media has emerged, primarily centered around protocols that seek to reconfigure how power is distributed across a network of actors [22,58,85].”

    From Seeing the Politics of Decentralized Social Media Protocols (2026) · cites this paper as [58]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) describes Mastodon as a decentralized alternative to Twitter, with a shared Activity Pub protocol connecting self-hosted servers that have distinct moderation policies. That supports the decentralized, protocol-based part of the claim, but the paper does not say that such protocols seek to reconfigure how power is distributed across actors. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Granovetter, M. S. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jeong, U., Sheth, P., Tahir, A., Alatawi, F., Bernard, H. R., & Liu, H.
Affiliations
Arizona State University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
Published
2024-05-28
Volume
18
Pages
738-750
ISSN
  • 2162-3449 (ISSN-L)
  • 2334-0770
OpenAlex
W4399205534
Cited by
34
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2
FWCI
14.01
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (2227488)
  • Northwestern University
  • Office of Naval Research (N00014-21-1-4002, N00014)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
Keywords
platform migration, Twitter, Mastodon, user behavior, social networking sites, user retention, migration patterns, behavior analysis, platform architecture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review