Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 617

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

SemEval-2014 Task 9: Sentiment Analysis in Twitter

Open access
Rosenthal, Sara, Ritter, Alan, Nakov, Preslav, Stoyanov, Veselin·2014·Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2014)

Abstract

We describe the Sentiment Analysis in Twitter task, ran as part of SemEval-2014.It is a continuation of the last year's task that ran successfully as part of SemEval-2013.As in 2013, this was the most popular SemEval task; a total of 46 teams contributed 27 submissions for subtask A (21 teams) and 50 submissions for subtask B (44 teams).This year, we introduced three new test sets: (i) regular tweets, (ii) sarcastic tweets, and (iii) LiveJournal sentences.We further tested on (iv) 2013 tweets, and (v) 2013 SMS messages.The highest F1score on (i) was achieved by NRC-Canada at 86.63 for subtask A and by TeamX at 70.96 for subtask B.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3115/v1/s14-2009

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 617

Metadata

Authors
Rosenthal, S., Ritter, A., Nakov, P., & Stoyanov, V.
Venue
Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2014)
Published
2014
Pages
73-80
OpenAlex
W2250243742
Cited by
617
References
0
FWCI
61.66
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SemEval-2014 Task 9: Sentiment Analysis in Twitter. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3115/v1/s14-2009
The paper
Rosenthal, S., Ritter, A., Nakov, P., & Stoyanov, V. (2014). SemEval-2014 Task 9: Sentiment Analysis in Twitter. Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2014). https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/s14-2009

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.