PreprintCited by 2Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Examining What Works for Whom and How in Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) for Recurrent Depression: A Moderated-Mediation Analysis in the PREVENT Trial (in press)

Open access

Abstract

Background: Personalized management of recurrent depression, considering individual patient characteristics, is crucial. Aims: This study evaluates the potentially different mediating role of mindfulness skills in managing recurrent depression using mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) among patients with varying depression severity. Method: Data from the PREVENT trial, comparing MBCT (with antidepressant medication (ADM) tapering support, MBCT-TS) vs. maintenance-ADM, was used. The study included pre, post, 9-, 12-, 18-, and 24-month follow-ups. Adult patients with ≥3 previous major depressive episodes, in full/partial remission (below threshold for a current episode), on ADM, were assessed for eligibility in primary care practices in the UK. Patients were randomized (1:1) to MBCT-TS or maintenance-ADM. We used the Beck Depression Inventory-II to evaluate depressive symptom changes over the six time points. Pre-post treatment, we employed the Five Facets of Mindfulness Questionnaire to gauge mindfulness skills. Baseline symptom and history variables were used to identify patients with varying severity profiles. We conducted Latent Profile Moderated-Mediation Growth Mixture Models. Results: A total of 424 patients (mean (SD) age=49.44 (12.31) years; with 325 (76.7%) self-identified as female) were included. A mediating effect of mindfulness skills, between trial arm allocation and the linear rate of depressive symptoms change over 24 months, moderated by depression severity, was observed (moderated-mediation index=-0.27, 95%CI=-0.66, -0.03). Conditional indirect effects were -0.42 (95%CI=-0.78, -0.18) for higher severity (expected mean BDI-II reduction=10 points), and -0.15 (95%CI=-0.35, -0.02) for lower severity (expected mean BDI-II reduction=3.5 points). Conclusions: Mindfulness skills constitute a unique mechanism driving change in MBCT (vs. maintenance-ADM). Patients with higher depression severity may benefit most from MBCT-TS for residual symptoms. It is unclear if these effects apply to those with a current depressive episode. Future research should investigate individuals who are not on medication. This study provides preliminary evidence for personalized management of recurrent depression.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.31219/osf.io/rsvnm

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Montero-Marin, J., Hinze, V., Maloney, S., van der Velden, A. M., Hayes, R., Watkins, E. R., Byford, S., Dalgleish, T., & Kuyken, W.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Published
2024-07-02
OpenAlex
W4400235365
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, recurrent depression, depression severity, mindfulness skills, antidepressant tapering, personalized treatment, mechanisms of change, PREVENT trial, primary care depression, residual depressive symptoms, growth mixture modeling, moderated mediation, major depressive episode, relapse prevention, Beck Depression Inventory-II

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review