Cited by 53Opioid Use Disorder TreatmentMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and Opioid Use

Neighborhood socioeconomic status and receipt of opioid medication for new back pain diagnosis

Open access
Gebauer, Sarah, Salas, Joanne, Scherrer, Jeffrey F.·2017·The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although treatment for new back pain is heavily guideline driven, deviations occur frequently. Neighborhood socioeconomic status (nSES) may contribute to these deviations. OBJECTIVE: Determine whether nSES is associated with type of treatment provided for patients seeking treatment for new back pain in primary care clinics. METHODS: This retrospective cohort was conducted in academic internal and family medicine practices. Data were examined from the Primary Care Patient Data Registry. Eligibility criteria included age ≥18 years, free of HIV and cancer, and presenting to primary care with a new diagnosis of back pain, resulting in1646 patients included. Patients' nSES was determined using ZIP code and calculating a validated index of 7 census-tract variables. Multinomial logistic regression was used to measure the association between nSES and 3 treatment outcomes compared with no pharmacologic management. Outcomes included opioid prescription, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID)/muscle relaxant prescription, or combined opioid/nonopioid treatment within 90 days of initial presentation. Covariates included age, sex, race, high clinic utilization (HCU), depression, anxiety, substance use, obesity, comorbidities, smoking, number of pain conditions, and physical therapy (PT) referral. RESULTS: The cohort was 67.9% female with an average age of 55.72 years (Standard Error [SE] = 0.387). Compared with no pharmacologic treatment, individuals in the low nSES group had 63% higher odds of receiving an opioid only compared with the high nSES group (odds ratio [OR], 1.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01 to 2.62). There was no significant association between nSES and odds of nonopioid or combined treatment compared with no pharmacotherapy (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.50), (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.67 to 1.78), respectively. Covariates associated with increased odds of opioid only included HCU, ever smoker, and increasing comorbidity index. PT referral was associated with NSAID/muscle relaxant only, and increasing age and comorbidity index were inversely associated with odds of NSAID/muscle relaxant only. Finally, covariates associated with increased odds of receiving both therapies included high clinic utilizusation, ever smoking, and PT referral. CONCLUSIONS: These data characterize a possible association between low nSES and increased risk of receiving an opioid only when being treated for new back pain. This may be evidence that patients of low nSES are at increased risk of receiving guideline-noncompliant treatment for new back pain.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3122/jabfm.2017.06.170061

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Franklin GM, Stover BD, Turner JA, et al. Early opioid prescription and subsequent disability among workers with back injuries: The Disability Risk Iden- tification Study Cohort. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008; 33:199 -204.
  2. Pletcher MJ, Kertesz SG, Kohn MA, et al. Trends in opioids prescribing by race/ethnicity for patients seeking care in US emergency departments. JAMA 2008;299:70 -78.
  3. Unick GJ, Rosenblum D, Mars S, et al. Intertwined epidemics: National demograhpic trends in hospital- izations for heroin-and opioid-related overdoses, 1993-2009. PLoS One 2013;8(2):e54496.
  4. Ramsay SE, Morris RW, Whincup PH, et al. The influence of neighborhood-level socioeconomic de- privation on cardiovascular disease mortality in older age: Longitudinal multilevel analysis from a cohort of older British men. J Epidemiol Community Health 2015;69:1224 -1231.
  5. Schoen MW, Tabak RG, Salas J, et al. Comparison of adherence to guidelines-based cholesterol treat- ment goals in men verses women. Am J Cardiol 2016;117:48 -53.
  6. Romano PS, Roos LL, Jollis JG. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM admin- istrative data: Differing perspectives. J Clin Epide- miol 1993;46:1075-1079.
  7. Simon L. Capsule commentary on Joynt et al., The impact of neighborhood socioeconomic status and race on the prescribing of opioids in emergency departments throughout the United States. J Gen Intern Med 2006;28:1647.
  8. Traeger AC, Hubscher M, Henschke N, et al. Effect of primary care-based education on reassurance in pa- tients with acute low back pain systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med 2015;175:733-743.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gebauer, S., Salas, J., & Scherrer, J. F.
Affiliations
Saint Louis University (US)
Venue
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Published
2017-11
Volume
30
Issue
6
Pages
775-783
ISSN
  • 1557-2625 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-7118
OpenAlex
W2769094299
Cited by
53
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
5.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
Keywords
neighborhood socioeconomic status, back pain, opioid prescribing, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, muscle relaxants, primary care, health care disparities, guideline adherence, physiotherapy referral, smoking, comorbidities, regional variation in care, socioeconomic status index, general practice, patient registry data, patient satisfaction
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Analgesics, Opioid, Back Pain, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Drug Prescriptions, Primary Health Care, Residence Characteristics, Retrospective Studies, Social Class, Socioeconomic Factors, Treatment Outcome, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Analgesics, Non-Narcotic, Guideline Adherence, Healthcare Disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review