Cited by 36Mental Health Treatment and AccessPsychiatric care and mental health servicesPrimary Care and Health Outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Changing Patterns of Mental Health Care Use: The Role of Integrated Mental Health Services in Veteran Affairs Primary Care

Open access

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Aiming to foster timely, high-quality mental health care for Veterans, VA's Primary Care-Mental Health Integration (PC-MHI) embeds mental health specialists in primary care and promotes care management for depression. PC-MHI and patient-centered medical home providers work together to provide the bulk of mental health care for primary care patients with low-to-moderate-complexity mental health conditions. This study examines whether increasing primary care clinic engagement in PC-MHI services is associated with changes in patient health care utilization and costs. METHODS: We performed a retrospective longitudinal cohort study of primary care patients with identified mental health needs in 29 Southern California VA clinics from October 1, 2008 to September 30, 2013, using electronic administrative data (n = 66,638). We calculated clinic PC-MHI engagement as the proportion of patients receiving PC-MHI services among all primary care clinic patients in each year. Capitalizing on variation in PC-MHI engagement across clinics, our multivariable regression models predicted annual patient use of 1) non-primary care based mental health specialty (MHS) visits, 2) total mental health visits (ie, the sum of MHS and PC-MHI visits), and 3) health care utilization and costs. We controlled for year- and clinic-fixed effects, other clinic interventions, and patient characteristics. RESULTS: = .002); this is a substitution rate, at the mean, of 1.5 PC-MHI visits for each MHS visit. There was no PC-MHI effect on other health care utilization and costs. CONCLUSIONS: As intended, greater clinic engagement in PC-MHI services seems to increase realized accessibility to mental health care for primary care patients, substituting PC-MHI for MHS visits, without increasing acute care use or total costs. Thus, PC-MHI services within primary care clinics may improve mental health care value at the patient population level. More research is needed to understand the relationship between clinic PC-MHI engagement and clinical quality of mental health care.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3122/jabfm.2018.01.170157

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • IPC has significantly improved access to mental health care in primary care, particularly for pharmacological treatment of anxiety.

    “IPC has significantly improved access to mental health care in primary care (Leung et al., 2018), particularly for pharmacological treatment of anxiety.”

    From Barriers to and Facilitators of Using Evidence-Based, Cognitive–Behavioral Anxiety Interventions in Integrated Primary Care Practice (2023) · cites this paper as Leung et al., 2018

    The Adjusted Analyses report significantly more total mental health visits at clinics with higher PC-MHI engagement, and the Discussion says this seems to improve access for primary care patients. The study reports an association and hedges its access conclusion, so the unqualified claim that integration improved access is stronger than the source supports. The anxiety-treatment phrase follows the citation and is not assessed as a claim attributed to Leung et al. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Pfeiffer PN, Szymanski BR, Zivin K, Post EP, Va- lenstein M, McCarthy JF. Are primary care mental 46 JABFM January-February 2018 Vol. 31 No. 1 http://www.jabfm.org on 15 July 2023 by guest. Protected by copyright. http://www.jabfm.org/ J Am Board Fam Med: first published as 10.3122/jabfm.2018.01.170157 on 12 January 2018. Downloaded from health services associated with differences in spe- cialty mental health clinic use? Psychiatr Serv 2011; 62:422-5.
  2. Goldman ML, Spaeth-Rublee B, Pincus HA. Qual- ity indicators for physical and behavioral health care integration. JAMA 2015;314:769 -70. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.01.170157 VA Primary Care Mental Health Integration 47 on 15 July 2023 by guest. Protected by copyright. http://www.jabfm.org/ J Am Board Fam Med: first published as 10.3122/jabfm.2018.01.170157 on 12 January 2018. Downloaded from · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Leung, L. B., Yoon, J., Rubenstein, L. V., Post, E. P., Metzger, M. E., Wells, K. B., Sugar, C. A., & Escarce, J. J.
Affiliations
RAND Corporation (US)
Venue
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Published
2018-01
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
38-48
ISSN
  • 1557-2625 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-7118
OpenAlex
W2783100652
Cited by
36
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4
FWCI
6.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  • Quality Enhancement Research Initiative
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (P50ES012383)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Keywords
primary care mental health integration, integrated mental health services, veterans, mental health service utilization, mental health care costs, primary health centers, care management, depression, patient-centered medical home, health care access
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Mental Disorders, California, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Mental Health, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Primary Health Care, Retrospective Studies, United States, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Delivery of Health Care, Integrated, Veterans Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review