A 16-week aerobic exercise and mindfulness-based intervention on chronic psychosocial stress: a pilot and feasibility study
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1186/s40814-020-00751-6 · Paper page
Abstract
ObjectivesResearchers have begun delivering mindfulness and aerobic exercise training concurrently on the premise that a combination intervention will yield salutary outcomes over and above each intervention alone. An estimate of the effect of combination training on chronic psychosocial stress in a nonclinical population has not been established. The objective of this study was to establish protocol feasibility in preparation of a definitive RCT targeting healthy individuals, and to explore the preliminary effect of combination training on reducing chronic psychosocial stress in this population.MethodsTwenty-four participants were allocated to a single-arm pre-post study and subjected to 16 weeks of concurrent mindfulness psychoeducation and aerobic exercise training. Feasibility criteria were collected and evaluated. Within-group changes in chronic psychosocial stress, mindfulness, emotion regulation, and cardiorespiratory fitness were also assessed. Primary analyses were based on 17 participants.ResultsRetention rate, response rate, recruitment rate, and sample size analyses indicate a definitive trial is feasible for detecting most effects with precision. There was also a decline in our primary dependent measure of chronic psychosocial stress (dpretest = −0.56, 95% CI [ −1.14,−0.06]). With regard to secondary measures, there was an increase in the use of cognitive reappraisal, and a reduction in use of maladaptive emotion regulation strategies. We are insufficiently confident to comment on changes in mindfulness and aerobic capacity (𝑉˙𝑂2𝑚𝑎𝑥). However, there were subgroup improvements in aerobic economy at submaximal exercise intensities.ConclusionsWe recommend a definitive trial is feasible and should proceed.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Mechanisms of mindfulness training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT
Lindsay, E. K., & Creswell, J. D. (2017) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2016.10.011 · Cited by 919 · see citing works
Parsons, C. E., Crane, C., Parsons, L. J., Fjorback, L. O., & Kuyken, W. (2017) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2017.05.004 · Cited by 550 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Prochilo, G., Costa, R. J. S., Hassed, C., Chambers, R., & Molenberghs, P.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Monash University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Prochilo, Guy
- Venue
- Pilot and Feasibility Studies
- Publisher
- Center for Open Science
- Published
- 2019-10-19
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 64-64
- ISSN
- 2055-5784 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7936438
- OpenAlex
- W3135823806
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 1.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Pilot and Feasibility Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Heart Foundation of Australia (1000458)
- University of Melbourne
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, psychology, and well-being
- Keywords
- aerobic exercise training, mindfulness-based interventions, chronic psychosocial stress, combined intervention, emotion regulation, cognitive reappraisal, maladaptive emotion regulation, cardiorespiratory fitness, non-clinical population, feasibility
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review