PreprintCited by 3Language and cultural evolutionEvolutionary Game Theory and CooperationEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

Cognitive Attractors and the Cultural Evolution of Religion

Open access
Poulsen, Victor, DeDeo, Simon·2023

Abstract

We use data on a cultural fitness landscape, recently inferred from a large-scale cross-cultural survey of religious practices (6000+ years, 407 cultures), to provide new insights into the dynamics of cultural macroevolution. We report three main results. First, we observe an emergent distinction between the long-run fitness of a religious practice, and its short-term stability: in particular, some low-fitness practices are nonetheless highly stable. Second, despite the exponentially large size of the landscape, we find a small number of cultural attractors, and 70% of all observed configurations flow into just four, which we label "monastic", "evangelical", "indigenous", and "pre-Axial". Finally, we find large variation in the evolvability of different traits, with some (such as a belief in punishing gods) strongly fixed by context, and others (such as belief in reincarnation) much more fluid.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.31234/osf.io/daxyu

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Despite efforts to watermark machine-created content, machine-made and human-made content will increasingly intertwine.

    “Despite efforts to watermark machine-created content 161 , machine-made and human-made content will increasingly intertwine 162 .”

    From Machine culture (2023) · cites this paper as [161]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Epskamp, S., Maris, G., Waldorp, L. J., & Borsboom, D. (2018). Network psychometrics. The Wiley handbook of psychometric testing: A multidisciplinary reference on sur- vey, scale and test development, 953-986.
  2. Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and brain sci- ences, 33(2-3), 61-83.
  3. Lee, E. D., Broedersz, C. P., & Bialek, W. (2015). Statistical mechanics of the US Supreme Court. Journal of Statistical Physics, 160(2), 275-301.
  4. Miton, H. (2022). Cultural attraction. PsyArXiv. (To appear in Oxford Handbook of Cultural Evolution.)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Poulsen, V., & DeDeo, S.
Affiliations
Santa Fe Institute (US)
Published
2023-06-26
OpenAlex
W4382283311
Cited by
3
References
24
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
religious practice, monasticism, evangelical Christianity, indigenous religion, Axial Age, evolvability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review