Advancing the Network Theory of Mental Disorders: A Computational Model of Panic Disorder
Open accessAbstract
The network theory of psychopathology posits that mental disorders are complex systems of mutually reinforcing symptoms. This overarching framework has proven highly generative but does not specify precisely how any specific mental disorder operates as such a system. We address this gap in the literature by developing a network theory of Panic Disorder and formalizing that theory as a computational model. We first review prior psychological theory and research on Panic Disorder in order to identify its core components as well as the plausible causal relations among those components. We then construct and evaluate a computational model of Panic Disorder as a non-linear dynamical system. We show that this model can explain a great deal, including individual differences in the propensity to experience panic attacks, key phenomenological characteristics of those attacks, the onset of Panic Disorder, and the efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy. We also show that the model identifies significant gaps in our understanding of Panic Disorder and propose a theory-driven research agenda for Panic Disorder that follows from our evaluation of the model. We conclude by discussing the implications of the model for how we understand and investigate mental disorders as complex systems.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Robinaugh and colleagues' (2019) computational model of panic disorder was able to simulate data that reproduced well-established panic disorder-related phenomena.
“Robinaugh and colleagues ' (2019) demonstrated this approach with a computational model of panic disorder, which was able to simulate data that reproduced well-established panic disorder-related phenomena.”
From Measuring the active elements of cognitive-behavioral therapies (2023) · cites this paper as Robinaugh et al., 2019
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Network analysis of multivariate data in psychological science
Borsboom, D., Deserno, M. K., Rhemtulla, M., Epskamp, S., Fried, E. I., McNally, R. J., Robinaugh, D. J., Perugini, M., Dalege, J., Costantini, G., et al. (2021) · Nature Reviews Methods Primers · doi:10.1038/s43586-021-00055-w · Cited by 1,371 · see citing works
Self-citationMeasurement Schmeasurement: Questionable Measurement Practices and How to Avoid Them
Flake, J. K., & Fried, E. I. (2020) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2515245920952393 · Cited by 969 · see citing works
Self-citationRobinaugh, D. J., Hoekstra, R. H. A., Toner, E. R., & Borsboom, D. (2020) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291719003404 · Cited by 861 · see citing works
Self-citationWhy Hypothesis Testers Should Spend Less Time Testing Hypotheses
Scheel, A. M., Tiokhin, L., Isager, P. M., & Lakens, D. (2021) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691620966795 · Cited by 382 · see citing works
Complexity theory of psychopathology.
Olthof, M., Hasselman, F., Oude Maatman, F., Bosman, A. M. T., & Lichtwarck-Aschoff, A. (2023) · Journal of Psychopathology and Clinical Science · doi:10.1037/abn0000740 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
A network perspective on suicidal behavior: understanding suicidality as a complex system
de Beurs, D., Bockting, C., Kerkhof, A., Scheepers, F., O’Connor, R., Penninx, B., & van de Leemput, I. (2021) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1111/sltb.12676 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Burger, J., van der Veen, D. C., Robinaugh, D. J., Quax, R., Riese, H., Schoevers, R. A., & Epskamp, S. (2020) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-020-01558-1 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Self-citationMeasuring the active elements of cognitive-behavioral therapies
Cohen, Z. D., Barnes-Horowitz, N. M., Forbes, C. N., & Craske, M. G. (2023) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2023.104364 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Brown, M. L., & Levinson, C. A. (2022) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.23728 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Systems‐based approaches to mental disorders are the only game in town
Borsboom, D., Haslbeck, J. M. B., & Robinaugh, D. J. (2022) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.21004 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Self-citationComparing symptom networks of daytime and nocturnal panic attacks in a community-based sample
Smith, N. S., Bauer, B. W., & Capron, D. W. (2022) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2021.102514 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Robinaugh, D., Haslbeck, J. M. B., Waldorp, L., Kossakowski, J. J., Fried, E. I., Millner, A., McNally, R. J., Ryan, O., de Ron, J., van der Maas, H., van Nes, E. H., Scheffer, M., Kendler, K. S., & Borsboom, D.
- ORCID
- Publisher
- Center for Open Science
- Published
- 2019-05-29
- OpenAlex
- W3162759992
- Cited by
- 120
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 7
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Keywords
- panic disorder, computational model, nonlinear dynamical systems, panic attacks, individual differences, cognitive behavioral therapy, complex systems, symptom networks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
