PreprintCited by 1Sleep and Work-Related FatigueSleep and Wakefulness ResearchHallucinations in medical conditions

The effects of acute sleep deprivation on cognitive control mechanisms associated with hallucinatory experiences

Open access
Punton, Georgia, Ellis, Jason G., Jensen, Emily, Malby, Connor, Sharif, Fatima, Smailes, David, Turnbull, Mark, Moseley, Peter·2024

Abstract

Sleep dysfunction can impair cognition and may play a causal role in the development of hallucinations. Deficits in cognitive control have been implicated in cognitive models of hallucinations. To better understand the underpinning role of cognition in the relationship between sleep and hallucinations, the current study aimed to investigate the impact of sleep deprivation on cognitive control mechanisms such as intentional inhibition and working memory capacity, as well as auditory top-down processing. Forty-five participants were allocated to either a sleep-deprivation condition (N = 15) or a rested control group condition (N = 30). Cognitive control assessments were applied at three timepoints for each condition: baseline (T1), post-sleep deprivation/post-habitual sleep (T2), and post-recovery sleep/post-habitual daily activity (T3). Results showed significant interactions between condition and timepoint on intentional inhibition and working memory, but not auditory top-down processing. Findings support current neurocognitive theories and suggest that sleep deprivation may lead to hallucinations through effects on intrusive thoughts, memories, and emotions. Future research should continue to explore the potential mechanistic pathway between cognitive control and sleep, to inform future intervention work. The study pre-registration, open materials, open data, and open code are available on the Open Science Framework (doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/28SRW).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.31234/osf.io/tm58r

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Punton, G., Ellis, J. G., Jensen, E., Malby, C., Sharif, F., Smailes, D., Turnbull, M., & Moseley, P.
Published
2024-11-22
OpenAlex
W4404718799
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
Keywords
sleep deprivation, hallucinations, cognitive control, intentional inhibition, working memory capacity, intrusive thoughts, emotions, recovery sleep

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review