The effects of acute sleep deprivation on cognitive control mechanisms associated with hallucinatory experiences
Open accessAbstract
Sleep dysfunction can impair cognition and may play a causal role in the development of hallucinations. Deficits in cognitive control have been implicated in cognitive models of hallucinations. To better understand the underpinning role of cognition in the relationship between sleep and hallucinations, the current study aimed to investigate the impact of sleep deprivation on cognitive control mechanisms such as intentional inhibition and working memory capacity, as well as auditory top-down processing. Forty-five participants were allocated to either a sleep-deprivation condition (N = 15) or a rested control group condition (N = 30). Cognitive control assessments were applied at three timepoints for each condition: baseline (T1), post-sleep deprivation/post-habitual sleep (T2), and post-recovery sleep/post-habitual daily activity (T3). Results showed significant interactions between condition and timepoint on intentional inhibition and working memory, but not auditory top-down processing. Findings support current neurocognitive theories and suggest that sleep deprivation may lead to hallucinations through effects on intrusive thoughts, memories, and emotions. Future research should continue to explore the potential mechanistic pathway between cognitive control and sleep, to inform future intervention work. The study pre-registration, open materials, open data, and open code are available on the Open Science Framework (doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/28SRW).
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sleep loss impairs working memory.
“The role of working memory in the sleep-hallucinations relationship has been experimentally tested in general population groups, confirming that sleep loss impairs working memory; 2 , 19”
From Towards an Integrative Account of Potential Mechanisms Mediating the Path From Sleep Dysfunction to Hallucinations (2025) · cites this paper as [19]
Two studies with non-clinical participants found that attentionally driven top-down processes may be resilient against the effects of sleep deprivation.
“Both studies found that these attentionally driven top-down processes may be resilient against the effects of sleep deprivation. 2 , 19”
From Towards an Integrative Account of Potential Mechanisms Mediating the Path From Sleep Dysfunction to Hallucinations (2025) · cites this paper as [19]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sheaves, B., Cropley, V. L., Moseley, P., Woodruff, P. W. R., Punton, G., Speth, C., Speth, J., Meerlo, P., & Brederoo, S. G. (2025) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbaf107 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Punton, G., Ellis, J. G., Jensen, E., Malby, C., Sharif, F., Smailes, D., Turnbull, M., & Moseley, P.
- Publisher
- Center for Open Science
- Published
- 2024-11-22
- OpenAlex
- W4404718799
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
- Keywords
- sleep deprivation, hallucinations, cognitive control, intentional inhibition, working memory capacity, intrusive thoughts, emotions, recovery sleep
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review