PreprintCited by 3Cognitive Abilities and TestingGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyIntergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies

Mechanisms of developmental change in genetic and environmental influences on intelligence

Open access
Morris, Damien Matthew, Ritchie, Stuart James, Plomin, Robert·2024

Abstract

We attempted to replicate previous findings of rising heritability and declining shared environmental influence on intelligence across development using the Twins Early Development Study—a large, longitudinal sample of British twins. Two longitudinal twin models (a Cholesky and Simplex model) were fitted to 9 waves of cognitive test data for 10,535 twin pairs. Heritability rose significantly from 24% at age 2 to 48-52% at age 16. Concurrently, shared environmental influence declined significantly from 65% to 9-13%. Moreover, nonshared environmental influences also increased significantly, rising from 11% to 39-40%. In early childhood, developmental gains in heritability were explained by the emergence of new genetic influences. In later childhood and adolescence, gains in heritability were explained by the continued emergence of new genetic influences but also the amplification of pre-existing genetic influences. This evidence for genetic amplification suggests that active gene-environment correlation is partly responsible for gains in heritability later in development. Shared environmental influence declined across development because pre-existing environmental influences decayed between waves faster than new environmental influences accumulated. Lastly, the rise in nonshared environmental influence was principally explained by age-specific environmental effects that increased in magnitude across development.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.31234/osf.io/uqybg

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This manifests as both a decrease in the additive genetic variance (starting in midlife) and an increase in the nonshared environmental variance components (the anti-Wilson Effect).

    “This manifests as both a decrease in the additive (starting in midlife) and an increase in the nonshared environmental variance components (termed the anti-Wilson Effect; Sarraf et al., 2023Sarraf et al., , 2025, Fig. 1, p. 2, see also Morris et al., 2025 for similar findings in relation to age-dependent increases in non-shared environmentality amongst younger cohorts).”

    From A Meta-Analysis of Spearman’s Hypothesis in the United States (2026) · cites this paper as Morris et al., 2025

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morris, D. M., Ritchie, S. J., & Plomin, R.
Published
2024-10-15
OpenAlex
W4403426821
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Medical Research Council (MR/M021475/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
Keywords
intelligence, heritability, shared environment, nonshared environment, gene-environment correlation, gene amplification, developmental changes, cognitive development, twins, simplex model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review