Cited by 0Cognitive Abilities and TestingPsychometric Methodologies and TestingEducation, Achievement, and Giftedness

A Meta-Analysis of Spearman’s Hypothesis in the United States

Open access
Woodley of Menie, Michael, Peñaherrera-Aguirre, Mateo, Sarraf, Matthew·2026·Intelligence & Cognitive Abilities

Abstract

A comprehensive meta-analysis of vector-correlation tests of Spearman’s Hypothesis (SH) with respect to US White-Black (W-B) cognitive performance differences is conducted. Thirty-one usable studies yielding 44 independent effect sizes were identified, with a total harmonic N of 1,039,379. A random-effects model, using subtest number to estimate inverse-variance weights, yielded a large-magnitude positive mean vector correlation, r = .745, 95% CI [.699, .792], with a prediction interval of .628 to .862, and modest between-study heterogeneity, I² = 25.61%, 95% CI [0.00%, 50.5%]. Sampling error accounted for 46.3% to 82.7% of between-study variance, depending on estimator, suggesting that some variance in those data is potentially due to moderators rather than sampling error. A three-moderator meta-regression including harmonic N , sample mean age, and study year yielded evidence of negative moderation by sample age. SH therefore appears to be weaker in older samples. No quadratic effect of age was detected. Funnel-plot diagnostics using Fisher- z -transformed effects indicated significant unadjusted Egger’s asymmetry, but this became non-significant after adjustment for the moderators. Trim-and-fill imputed no missing effect sizes. The presence of age-dependent moderation, including both reversals and attenuation of effect sizes in older samples, makes claimed isomorphism between g and W-B differences difficult to sustain. The results instead suggest complex environmental confounding potentiating, attenuating, or even reversing the g -dependence of W-B differences.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This meta-analysis synthesizes 44 independent vector-correlation tests of Spearman's Hypothesis (SH) in US White–Black cognitive performance comparisons, finding a large positive mean vector correlation of r = .745. However, sample mean age significantly and negatively moderated the effect, which the authors argue undermines strong claims that g is isomorphic to White–Black differences.

Key findings

  • Across 31 studies and 44 independent effect sizes (total harmonic N = 1,039,379), the random-effects mean vector correlation was r = .745, 95% CI [.699, .792], with a prediction interval of .628 to .862 and modest heterogeneity, I² = 25.61%, 95% CI [0.00%, 50.5%].
  • Sampling error accounted for 46.3% to 82.7% of between-study variance depending on estimator (classic Schmidt-Hunter 46.3%, CI-derived SE² 61.7%, Fisher-z 82.7%), leaving room for moderator effects.
  • In the mutually adjusted three-moderator model, mean sample age was a significant negative moderator (B = -.003 per year, p = .042); harmonic N (p = .466) and publication year (p = .149) were not significant. A quadratic age term was non-significant (F(1,41) = .002, p = .962).
  • Funnel-plot diagnostics showed significant unadjusted Egger's asymmetry (intercept = -1.687, p = .002), which became non-significant after moderator adjustment (-1.195, p = .074); trim-and-fill imputed no missing effect sizes.

Methods

  • Systematic search of Google Scholar, ProQuest, PsycINFO, and CataloguePlus, supplemented by reference searches and prior meta-analyses/reviews; inclusion required at least five subtests, and excluded pathological, carceral, job-complexity, and item-level samples. Searches were run twice (February 2025 and June 2026); no formal protocol was registered.
  • Hedges and Olkin-type random-effects meta-analysis weighting by subtest number (inverse variance from SEs derived from reported 95% CIs), plus a bare-bones sampling-error estimate; three moderators tested (harmonic N, mean age, study year) with low collinearity (VIFs 1.043–1.079).
  • Analyses conducted in Python 3.13.5 (NumPy, pandas, SciPy, Matplotlib), with custom functions for REML meta-regression, Egger's regressions, and trim-and-fill; a leave-one-out analysis on the age moderator kept the coefficient negative in all 31 iterations (significant in 21, B ranging -.006 to -.002, average p ≈ .051).

Limitations

  • Stated: effect sizes were not disattenuated for error, and factors such as range restriction, vector reliabilities, and g-vector validity contribute to heterogeneity; overcorrection (r > 1.00) is a common problem, indicating vector-level reliabilities are not yet precisely estimated.
  • Stated: vector correlations can be distorted by subtest sampling in ways that misleadingly suggest g-moderated differences (Ashton & Lee, 2005); the authors call for a heuristic scale approximating battery imbalance for future use as a moderator.
  • Evident from the text: the authors note that variation in SH vector correlations may in some instances provide limited information about causal moderation, and that the age-related mechanisms they propose (selective survival, differential morbidity) remain speculative.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.65550/001c.171909

Cites

50 of 51 references verified1 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

7 of 37 cited sources checked · 5 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Interpretationown data

    The present findings greatly generalise those of more restricted meta-analyses of Spearman's Hypothesis in adult US Black-White data, extending their scope with respect to moderation.

    “These findings greatly generalise those of more restricted meta-analyses of SH in adult US W-B data (te Nijenhuis & van den Hoek, 2016) extending their scope with respect to moderation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites te Nijenhuis & van den Hoek, 2016 source
  • Premisecitation

    Overcorrection, where the vector correlation becomes greater than 1.00, is a commonly encountered problem when disattenuation adjustments are applied.

    “overcorrection (where the vector correlation becomes >1.00) is a commonly encountered problem when these sorts of adjustments are applied (e.g., Woodley of Menie et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Woodley of Menie et al., 2018 source

      In the Analysis involving MCV section (page not specified), the paper reports one vector correlation that rose above 1.00 after measurement-error correction and calls this overcorrection. That supports the definition and an example, but not the claim that the problem is commonly encountered. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Among incarcerated and institutionalized (carceral) populations, Spearman's Hypothesis appears to be reversed.

    “Of relevance are findings from incarcerated and institutionalized (carceral) populations, amongst whom SH appears to be reversed (Woodley of Menie et al., 2025).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Woodley of Menie et al., 2025 source
  • Findingown data

    Trim-and-fill imputed no missing effect sizes.

    “Trim-and-fill imputed no missing effect sizes.”
    • Also stated in: § Publication bias · plain
      “Trimand-fill revealed no potentially missing effect sizes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Trim-and-fill yielded no indications of missing effect sizes.

    “Trim-and-fill yielded no indications of missing effect sizes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 12
  • May combine two claims. 13
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Previous meta-analyses and non-systematic reviews have generally supported Spearman's Hypothesis in US W-B comparisons, with positive vector correlations observed across all cognitive batteries and samples.

    “Previous meta-analyses and non-systematic reviews have generally supported SH in US W-B comparisons, with positive vector correlations observed across all cognitive batteries and samples (Jensen, 1985(Jensen, , 1998;;te Nijenhuis & van den Hoek, 2016).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Jensen, 1985 source
    • cites Jensen, 1998

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites te Nijenhuis & van den Hoek, 2016 source

      The Introduction (page unavailable) says Spearman’s Hypothesis was confirmed in the large majority of comparisons and for all assessment instruments studied. The Results (page unavailable) report positive vector correlations for all 15 data points in this meta-analysis of US Black and White adults. Those passages support the general pattern, but not the unrestricted claim that correlations were positive across all cognitive batteries and samples in prior US comparisons. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Woodley of Menie et al. (2025) found that carceral W-B difference vectors cluster positively with vectors of non-shared environmentality, whilst g and culture-loading vectors show the opposite (negative) clustering pattern.

    “Precisely in line with this, Woodley of Menie et al. (2025) found that carceral W-B difference vectors cluster positively with vectors of non-shared environmentality, whilst g and culture-loading vectors show the opposite (negative) clustering pattern.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Woodley of Menie et al. (2025) source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The heritability of cognitive ability tends to increase from childhood into early adulthood (the Wilson Effect).

    “Although the heritability of cognitive ability tends to increase from childhood into early adulthood (this being the Wilson Effect; Bouchard, 2013)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bouchard, 2013 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    A further nine usable studies were identified based on the search.

    “A further nine usable studies were identified based on the search (Blankson & McArdle, 2015;Dalliard, 2013;Fuerst et al., 2023;Hu, 2025;Kane, 2004Kane, , 2007;;Kane & Brand, 2008; National Academy of Sciences [NAS], 1921;Shibaev & Fuerst, 2026).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Blankson & McArdle, 2015 source
    • cites Dalliard, 2013

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Fuerst et al., 2023 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Reanalysis of raw data netted four additional effect sizes (MIDUS-II and MIDUS Refresher with the Milwaukee African American sample; Woodley of Menie et al., 2015, and two further effect sizes from Osborne's [1980] study).

    “This netted four additional effect sizes (MIDUS-II and MIDUS Refresher with the Milwaukee African American sample; Woodley of Menie et al., 2015, and two further effect sizes from Osborne's [1980] study).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Woodley of Menie et al., 2015 source
    • cites Osborne's [1980]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In the meta-analysis of Spearman's Hypothesis in US Black-White comparisons, the pooled effect size (vector correlation) is large, r = .745, 95% CI [.699, .792], with modest between-effect-size heterogeneity.

    “The meta-analysis of SH in US W-B comparisons yields evidence of a large-magnitude effect size (r=.745,95% CI [.699, .792]),exhibiting modest between-effect size heterogeneity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Funnel-plot diagnostics using Fisher-z-transformed effects indicated significant unadjusted Egger's asymmetry, but this became non-significant after adjustment for the moderators.

    “Funnel-plot diagnostics using Fisher-z-transformed effects indicated significant unadjusted Egger's asymmetry, but this became non-significant after adjustment for the moderators.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Thirty-one usable studies yielding 44 independent effect sizes were identified, with a total harmonic N of 1,039,379.

    “Thirty-one usable studies yielding 44 independent effect sizes were identified, with a total harmonic N of 1,039,379.”
    • Also stated in: § Meta-analytic search · plain
      “The total yield was of 31 studies comprising 44 independent effect sizes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Among unadjusted (z-transformed) effect sizes, funnel asymmetry plots yielded indications of significant asymmetry; when moderator-controlled values were used, the asymmetry became non-significant.

    “Amongst the unadjusted (z-transformed) effect sizes, funnel asymmetry plots yielded indications of significant asymmetry, however when moderator-controlled values were used, the asymmetry became non-significant.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingreasoning

    The search yielded an additional two studies and four effect sizes from studies reporting data based on scholastic attainment criteria or g loadings from elementary cognitive tasks.

    “This yielded an additional two studies and four effect sizes (Jensen, 1993;Warne, 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Jensen, 1993 source
    • cites Warne, 2016 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The age moderator coefficient remained negative after every leave-one-out iteration and was significant in 21 out of 31 iterations, with B values ranging from -.006 to -.002 per year, and an average LOO p≈.051.

    “The coefficient remained negative after every iteration (involving the removal of one of the 31 studies) and was significant 21 out of 31 iterations, with B values ranging from -.006 to -.002 per year, and an average LOO p≈.051.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The mean or midpoint sample ages sourced from studies or inferred are accurate.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis has repeatedly found that both weak and strong forms of measurement invariance obtain in US W-B differences, with g accounting for between 51% and 100% of the variance in the group difference across studies.

    “Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis (MGCFA) has however repeatedly found that both weak and strong forms of measurement invariance obtain in US W-B differences (with g accounting for between 51% and 100% of the variance in the group difference across studies; Lasker et al., 2021, Table 7, p. 24)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lasker et al., 2021 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Incarceration risk is a potentially g-loaded variable, and carceral samples are therefore non-representative of the broader population.

    “Carceral samples (specifically those who were tested in situ with respect to the prison system) were also excluded from the meta-analysis as incarceration risk is a potentially g loaded variable, and they are therefore non-representative of the broader population (Jensen, 1992).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jensen, 1992 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This increase in non-shared environmental variance with age should weaken the organization of group differences around g, causing the vector correlations indexing SH to become attenuated.

    “This increase in non-shared environmental variance with age should weaken the orga-nization of group differences around g, causing the vector correlations indexing SH to become attenuated.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    When disattenuation corrections are applied, the magnitude of vector correlations will invariably increase.

    “When such corrections are applied, the magnitude of vector correlations will invariably increase (Jensen, 1998)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jensen, 1998

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Age is a prospectively important moderator because it potentially captures rising non-shared environmentality which should weaken Spearman's Hypothesis.

    “As noted in the Introduction, age is a prospectively important moderator because it potentially captures rising non-shared environmentality which should weaken SH.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Variability amongst the vector correlations likely reflects meaningful residual variance and is therefore more than just sampling error, consistent with the action of potential age moderation.

    “indicating that variability amongst the vector correlations likely reflects meaningful residual variance and is therefore more than just sampling error, consistent with the action of potential age moderation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Sampling error estimates allow for the degree to which between-study variance might be substantive, i.e., due to the action of potential moderators.

    “Sampling error estimates allow for the degree to which between-study variance might be substantive, i.e. due to the action of potential moderators (Schmidt & Hunter, 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Schmidt & Hunter, 2015 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    A positively signed vector correlation is not necessarily indicative of a g-moderated difference amongst groups.

    “A major reason for this is the argument that a positively signed vector cor-relation is not necessarily indicative of a g moderated difference amongst groups.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Ashton & Lee, 2005 source
    • cites Jensen, 1998

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    This manifests as both a decrease in the additive genetic variance (starting in midlife) and an increase in the nonshared environmental variance components (the anti-Wilson Effect).

    “This manifests as both a decrease in the additive (starting in midlife) and an increase in the nonshared environmental variance components (termed the anti-Wilson Effect; Sarraf et al., 2023Sarraf et al., , 2025, Fig. 1, p. 2, see also Morris et al., 2025 for similar findings in relation to age-dependent increases in non-shared environmentality amongst younger cohorts).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Sarraf et al., 2023 source
    • cites Sarraf et al., 2025 source
    • cites Morris et al., 2025 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisereasoning

    If group differences are substantially influenced by narrower cognitive abilities, test-specific sources of variance, measurement error, or environmental perturbations not strongly aligned with g, then the vector correlation should be weaker.

    “If group differences are instead substantially influenced by narrower cognitive abilities, test-specific sources of variance, measurement error, or environmental perturbations that are not strongly aligned with g (such as those stemming from the nonshared environment), then the vector correlation should be weaker.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Subtest number is likely related to the nomological breadth of a given battery, and nomological breadth strongly influences the stability of vector correlations.

    “Secondly, the requirement for a minimum of four subtests was tightened to five, as subtest number is likely related to the nomological breadth of a given battery, and nomological breadth strongly influences the stability of vector correlations (Jensen, 1998).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jensen, 1998

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Differences with respect to non-g latent variables (such as group factors) can generate the appearance of g-moderated differences when a battery is sufficiently nomologically unbalanced with respect to the sampling of cognitive domains.

    “Differences with respect to non-g latent variables (such as group factors) can generate the appearance of g moderated differences in instances where a battery is sufficiently nomologically unbalanced with respect to the sampling of cognitive domains (Ashton & Lee, 2005;Jensen, 1998).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Ashton & Lee, 2005 source
    • cites Jensen, 1998

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

23 of 23
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The included samples are representative of the US White and Black populations.

    “Carceral samples (specifically those who were tested in situ with respect to the prison system) were also excluded from the meta-analysis as incarceration risk is a potentially g loaded variable, and they are therefore non-representative of the broader population (Jensen, 1992).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The mean or midpoint sample ages sourced from studies or inferred are accurate.

    “Mean (or midpoint) sample ages were sourced from the studies or were inferred based on additional criteria.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Study year is a valid proxy for secular trends or Decline Effects.

    “Finally, study year was also included to test for the possibility of secular trends or so-called Decline Effects (decreases in effect sizes over time) perhaps reflecting selective reporting early in the research paradigm (e.g., Schooler, 2011).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The subtest g-loadings used from each study are valid measures of g.

    “The primary effect size is the (uncorrected) vector correlation between subtest g-loadings and W-B subtest-level differences.”
4 of 4

Statistics recomputed

Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.

  • ConsistentF(1, 41) = 0.002reported p = .962 · recomputed p = .965

    “F(1,41)=.002,p = .962”

1 of 1

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Self-check results appear here once an independent check has confirmed them.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Dalliard, 2013, Spearman's Hypothesis and racial differences on the DAS-II, Human Varieties
  2. J. J. Deeks, 2024, Chapter 10: Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses
  3. Office of Management and Budget, 1997, Revisions to the standards for the classification of federal data on race and ethnicity, Federal Register, 62, 58782
  4. J. P. Rushton, 1999, Secular gains in IQ not related to the g factor and inbreeding depression – unlike Black-White differences: A reply to Flynn, Personality & Individual Differences, 26, 381

Authors
Woodley of Menie, M., Peñaherrera-Aguirre, M., & Sarraf, M.
Affiliations
  • Independent Sector
  • University of Arizona
  • Independent Sector (US)
Venue
Intelligence & Cognitive Abilities
Publisher
Finulus, Inc
Published
2026-10-13
ISSN
3069-6488 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7221703585
Cited by
0
References
46
Type
dissertation
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Intelligence & Cognitive Abilities (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Keywords
Spearman's hypothesis, general intelligence, vector correlation, sampling error, environmental confounding, racial differences in intelligence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-29.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-29.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review