A Meta-Analysis of Spearman’s Hypothesis in the United States
Open accessAbstract
A comprehensive meta-analysis of vector-correlation tests of Spearman’s Hypothesis (SH) with respect to US White-Black (W-B) cognitive performance differences is conducted. Thirty-one usable studies yielding 44 independent effect sizes were identified, with a total harmonic N of 1,039,379. A random-effects model, using subtest number to estimate inverse-variance weights, yielded a large-magnitude positive mean vector correlation, r = .745, 95% CI [.699, .792], with a prediction interval of .628 to .862, and modest between-study heterogeneity, I² = 25.61%, 95% CI [0.00%, 50.5%]. Sampling error accounted for 46.3% to 82.7% of between-study variance, depending on estimator, suggesting that some variance in those data is potentially due to moderators rather than sampling error. A three-moderator meta-regression including harmonic N , sample mean age, and study year yielded evidence of negative moderation by sample age. SH therefore appears to be weaker in older samples. No quadratic effect of age was detected. Funnel-plot diagnostics using Fisher- z -transformed effects indicated significant unadjusted Egger’s asymmetry, but this became non-significant after adjustment for the moderators. Trim-and-fill imputed no missing effect sizes. The presence of age-dependent moderation, including both reversals and attenuation of effect sizes in older samples, makes claimed isomorphism between g and W-B differences difficult to sustain. The results instead suggest complex environmental confounding potentiating, attenuating, or even reversing the g -dependence of W-B differences.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This meta-analysis synthesizes 44 independent vector-correlation tests of Spearman's Hypothesis (SH) in US White–Black cognitive performance comparisons, finding a large positive mean vector correlation of r = .745. However, sample mean age significantly and negatively moderated the effect, which the authors argue undermines strong claims that g is isomorphic to White–Black differences.
Key findings
- Across 31 studies and 44 independent effect sizes (total harmonic N = 1,039,379), the random-effects mean vector correlation was r = .745, 95% CI [.699, .792], with a prediction interval of .628 to .862 and modest heterogeneity, I² = 25.61%, 95% CI [0.00%, 50.5%].
- Sampling error accounted for 46.3% to 82.7% of between-study variance depending on estimator (classic Schmidt-Hunter 46.3%, CI-derived SE² 61.7%, Fisher-z 82.7%), leaving room for moderator effects.
- In the mutually adjusted three-moderator model, mean sample age was a significant negative moderator (B = -.003 per year, p = .042); harmonic N (p = .466) and publication year (p = .149) were not significant. A quadratic age term was non-significant (F(1,41) = .002, p = .962).
- Funnel-plot diagnostics showed significant unadjusted Egger's asymmetry (intercept = -1.687, p = .002), which became non-significant after moderator adjustment (-1.195, p = .074); trim-and-fill imputed no missing effect sizes.
Methods
- Systematic search of Google Scholar, ProQuest, PsycINFO, and CataloguePlus, supplemented by reference searches and prior meta-analyses/reviews; inclusion required at least five subtests, and excluded pathological, carceral, job-complexity, and item-level samples. Searches were run twice (February 2025 and June 2026); no formal protocol was registered.
- Hedges and Olkin-type random-effects meta-analysis weighting by subtest number (inverse variance from SEs derived from reported 95% CIs), plus a bare-bones sampling-error estimate; three moderators tested (harmonic N, mean age, study year) with low collinearity (VIFs 1.043–1.079).
- Analyses conducted in Python 3.13.5 (NumPy, pandas, SciPy, Matplotlib), with custom functions for REML meta-regression, Egger's regressions, and trim-and-fill; a leave-one-out analysis on the age moderator kept the coefficient negative in all 31 iterations (significant in 21, B ranging -.006 to -.002, average p ≈ .051).
Limitations
- Stated: effect sizes were not disattenuated for error, and factors such as range restriction, vector reliabilities, and g-vector validity contribute to heterogeneity; overcorrection (r > 1.00) is a common problem, indicating vector-level reliabilities are not yet precisely estimated.
- Stated: vector correlations can be distorted by subtest sampling in ways that misleadingly suggest g-moderated differences (Ashton & Lee, 2005); the authors call for a heuristic scale approximating battery imbalance for future use as a moderator.
- Evident from the text: the authors note that variation in SH vector correlations may in some instances provide limited information about causal moderation, and that the age-related mechanisms they propose (selective survival, differential morbidity) remain speculative.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
7 of 37 cited sources checked · 5 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationown data
The present findings greatly generalise those of more restricted meta-analyses of Spearman's Hypothesis in adult US Black-White data, extending their scope with respect to moderation.
“These findings greatly generalise those of more restricted meta-analyses of SH in adult US W-B data (te Nijenhuis & van den Hoek, 2016) extending their scope with respect to moderation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites te Nijenhuis & van den Hoek, 2016 source
- Premisecitation
Overcorrection, where the vector correlation becomes greater than 1.00, is a commonly encountered problem when disattenuation adjustments are applied.
“overcorrection (where the vector correlation becomes >1.00) is a commonly encountered problem when these sorts of adjustments are applied (e.g., Woodley of Menie et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Woodley of Menie et al., 2018 source
In the Analysis involving MCV section (page not specified), the paper reports one vector correlation that rose above 1.00 after measurement-error correction and calls this overcorrection. That supports the definition and an example, but not the claim that the problem is commonly encountered. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Among incarcerated and institutionalized (carceral) populations, Spearman's Hypothesis appears to be reversed.
“Of relevance are findings from incarcerated and institutionalized (carceral) populations, amongst whom SH appears to be reversed (Woodley of Menie et al., 2025).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Woodley of Menie et al., 2025 source
- Findingown data
Trim-and-fill imputed no missing effect sizes.
“Trim-and-fill imputed no missing effect sizes.”
- Also stated in: § Publication bias · plain
“Trimand-fill revealed no potentially missing effect sizes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Also stated in: § Publication bias · plain
- Findingown data
Trim-and-fill yielded no indications of missing effect sizes.
“Trim-and-fill yielded no indications of missing effect sizes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingown data
The age moderator exhibits a statistically significant effect.
“The age moderator was found to exhibit a statistically significant effect.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“Mean age Per year -.003 .002-.007 to -.000 .042”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
- Findingown data
The prediction interval for the mean vector correlation was .628 to .862.
“with a prediction interval of .628 to .862”
- Also stated in: § Meta-analysis · plain
“The prediction interval ranged from .628 to .862.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Also stated in: § Meta-analysis · plain
- Findingown data
Between-study heterogeneity was I2 = 25.61%, 95% CI [0.00%, 50.5%].
“modest between-study heterogeneity, I² = 25.61%,95% CI [0.00%, 50.5%]”
- Also stated in: § Meta-analysis · plain
“Heterogeneity fell into the moderate range based on conventional guidelines, I 2 = 25.61%,95% CI [0.00%, 50.5%]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Also stated in: § Meta-analysis · plain
- Findingown data
No quadratic effect of age was detected.
“No quadratic effect of age was detected.”
- Also stated in: § Meta-analysis · plain
“A quadratic analysis was also conducted on age to check for non-linear moderation; however, the results were nonsignificant (F(1,41)=.002,p=.962, ΔAIC = +1.98).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Also stated in: § Meta-analysis · plain
- Findingown data
Sampling error accounts for between 46.3% and 82.7% of the variance amongst effect sizes, depending on the estimation protocol.
“Sampling error accounts for between 46.3% and 82.7% of the variance amongst effect sizes (depending on the estimation protocol), leaving some room for moderatorrelated heterogeneity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Sampling error accounted for 46.3% to 82.7% of between-study variance, depending on estimator.
“Sampling error accounted for 46.3% to 82.7% of between-study variance, depending on estimator”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A three-moderator meta-regression including harmonic N, sample mean age, and study year yielded evidence of negative moderation by sample age.
“A three-moderator meta-regression including harmonic N, sample mean age, and study year yielded evidence of negative moderation by sample age.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The mean or midpoint sample ages sourced from studies or inferred are accurate.
- Findingcitation
Only one of the bare-bones sampling error estimates exceeds the 75% rule-of-thumb threshold.
“Only one of these estimates exceeds the 75% rule-ofthumb threshold (Schmidt et al., 1988) indicating that variability amongst the vector correlations likely reflects meaningful residual variance and is therefore more than just sampling error, consistent with the action of potential age moderation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schmidt et al., 1988 source
- Findingown data
A random-effects model using subtest number to estimate inverse-variance weights yielded a mean vector correlation of r = .745, 95% CI [.699, .792].
“A random-effects model, using subtest number to estimate inverse-variance weights, yielded a large-magnitude positive mean vector correlation, r = .745,95% CI [.699, .792]”
- Also stated in: § Meta-analysis · plain
“The aggregate effect size is .745,95% CI [.699, .792].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The included samples are representative of the US White and Black populations.
- Rests on an assumption: The subtest g-loadings used from each study are valid measures of g.
- Also stated in: § Meta-analysis · plain
- Interpretationreasoning
If increasing age is associated with a larger contribution of idiosyncratic, non-shared, health-related, and stochastic influences to cognitive-performance variance, then the alignment between g-loadings and between-group subtest differences should weaken.
“If increasing age is associated with a larger contribution of idiosyncratic, non-shared, healthrelated, and stochastic influences to cognitive-performance variance, then the alignment between g-loadings and between-group subtest differences should weaken.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning
Age is a theoretically important moderator of Spearman's Hypothesis in the context of representative samples.
“Age is a theoretically important moderator of SH in the context of representative samples.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductcitation
Moderator collinearity was low, with variance inflation factors ranging from 1.043 to 1.079.
“Moderator collinearity was low, with variance inflation factors ranging from 1.043 to 1.079 (values <5 are considered indicative of negligible collinearity; Menard, 1995).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Menard, 1995
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Study design and conductown data
Sensitivity analysis on the Fisher-z scale yielded substantively similar results to the primary raw-r model.
“As the primary model is presented using a raw-r scale, a sensitivity analysis was conducted in which models that were also estimated on the Fisher-z scale were back-transformed; these yielded substantively similar results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Heterogeneity fell into the moderate range based on conventional guidelines.
“Heterogeneity fell into the moderate range based on conventional guidelines, I 2 = 25.61%,95% CI [0.00%, 50.5%]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The age-related attenuation of Spearman's Hypothesis is compatible with anti-Wilson-effect accounts of late-life cognition, in which the genetic structuring of g becomes increasingly disrupted by cumulative environmental insults.
“This is compatible with anti-Wilson-effect accounts of late-life cognition, in which the genetic structuring of g becomes increasingly disrupted by cumulative environmental insults (Sarraf et al., 2023(Sarraf et al., , 2025)).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationcitation
The confidence interval for heterogeneity spans values consistent with relatively low to substantial heterogeneity.
“although the confidence interval spans values consistent with relatively low to substantial heterogeneity (Deeks et al., 2024).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Deeks et al., 2024
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
There is evidence that the direction of the effect is not invariant across contexts.
“However, there is also evidence that the direction of the effect is not invariant across contexts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
The primary limitation of the meta-analysis is that the effect sizes were not disattenuated for error.
“The primary limitation is that the effect sizes were not disattenuated for error.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The aggregate effect size is of large magnitude (r ≥ .50).
“This is of large magnitude (r≥.50, Cohen, 1988).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cohen, 1988
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Variation in the magnitude of the SH vector correlation across studies might, in some instances, provide limited information about causal moderation.
“Thus, variation in the magnitude of the SH vector correlation across studies might, in some instances, provide limited information about causal moderation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The results suggest complex environmental confounding potentiating, attenuating, or even reversing the g-dependence of W-B differences.
“The results instead suggest complex environmental confounding potentiating, attenuating, or even reversing the g-dependence of W-B differences.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The included samples are representative of the US White and Black populations.
- Rests on an assumption: The subtest g-loadings used from each study are valid measures of g.
- Premisecitation
Factors such as range restriction with respect to the nomological breadth of g loadings, the reliabilities of the g and Black-White vectors, and the validity of the g vector contribute to between-study heterogeneity independently of sampling error.
“Factors such as range-restriction with respect to the nomological breadth of g loadings, in addition to the reliabilities of the g and W-B vectors, and even the validity of the g vector will contribute to betweenstudy heterogeneity independently of sampling error (Jensen, 1998).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jensen, 1998
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Age-related attenuation of Spearman's Hypothesis implies that Black-White differences become less cleanly organized with respect to g as non-g and environmentally contingent sources of variance accumulate.
“Age-related attenuation of SH therefore implies that such differences become less cleanly organized with respect to g, as non-g and environmentally contingent sources of variance accumulate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Some variance in the data is potentially due to moderators rather than sampling error.
“suggesting that some variance in those data is potentially due to moderators rather than sampling error”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The finding that the magnitude and even the sign of vector correlations vary across age-related contexts is inconsistent with the idea that Spearman's Hypothesis is isomorphic to g as proposed in its strongest form by Gordon (1985).
“The finding that the magnitude, and even the sign of vector correlations vary across age-related contexts is inconsistent with the idea that SH is isomorphic to g (as proposed in its strongest form by Gordon, 1985).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gordon, 1985 source
- Interpretationown data
Spearman's Hypothesis appears to be weaker in older samples.
“SH therefore appears to be weaker in older samples.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The mean or midpoint sample ages sourced from studies or inferred are accurate.
- Premisecitation
Evidence from later life suggests that the structure of cognitive variance changes again, as health-related and idiosyncratic environmental influences become more prominent.
“evidence from later life suggests that the structure of cognitive variance changes again, as healthrelated and idiosyncratic environmental influences become more prominent.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The presence of age-dependent moderation, including both reversals and attenuation of effect sizes in older samples, makes claimed isomorphism between g and W-B differences difficult to sustain.
“The presence of age-dependent moderation, including both reversals and attenuation of effect sizes in older samples, makes claimed isomorphism between g and W-B differences difficult to sustain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The included samples are representative of the US White and Black populations.
- Rests on an assumption: The subtest g-loadings used from each study are valid measures of g.
- Premisecitation
In Peñaherrera-Aguirre et al. (2022), the vector of gene-by-environment interaction effects clustered positively and significantly with a group-differences vector, g loadings, and a shared environmentality vector.
“In Peñaherrera-Aguirre et al. (2022) it was found specifically that the vector of these clustered positively and significantly with a group-differences vector, g loadings, and a shared environmentality vector.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Peñaherrera-Aguirre et al. (2022) source
- Interpretationcitation
The straightforward interpretation of Spearman's Hypothesis as demonstrating some non-trivial degree of moderation from g on the group-difference vector is reasonable.
“which indicates that the straightforward interpretation of SH as demonstrating some non-trivial degree of moderation from g on the group-difference vector is reasonable.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Vector correlations can be distorted by subtest sampling in such a way as to yield misleading indications of g-moderated differences.
“vector correlations can be distorted by subtest sampling in such a way as to yield misleading indications of g moderated differences (Ashton & Lee, 2005).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ashton & Lee, 2005 source
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 12
- May combine two claims. 13
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPrevious meta-analyses and non-systematic reviews have generally supported Spearman's Hypothesis in US W-B comparisons, with positive vector correlations observed across all cognitive batteries and samples.
“Previous meta-analyses and non-systematic reviews have generally supported SH in US W-B comparisons, with positive vector correlations observed across all cognitive batteries and samples (Jensen, 1985(Jensen, , 1998;;te Nijenhuis & van den Hoek, 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Jensen, 1985 source
- cites Jensen, 1998
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites te Nijenhuis & van den Hoek, 2016 source
The Introduction (page unavailable) says Spearman’s Hypothesis was confirmed in the large majority of comparisons and for all assessment instruments studied. The Results (page unavailable) report positive vector correlations for all 15 data points in this meta-analysis of US Black and White adults. Those passages support the general pattern, but not the unrestricted claim that correlations were positive across all cognitive batteries and samples in prior US comparisons. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationWoodley of Menie et al. (2025) found that carceral W-B difference vectors cluster positively with vectors of non-shared environmentality, whilst g and culture-loading vectors show the opposite (negative) clustering pattern.
“Precisely in line with this, Woodley of Menie et al. (2025) found that carceral W-B difference vectors cluster positively with vectors of non-shared environmentality, whilst g and culture-loading vectors show the opposite (negative) clustering pattern.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Woodley of Menie et al. (2025) source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe heritability of cognitive ability tends to increase from childhood into early adulthood (the Wilson Effect).
“Although the heritability of cognitive ability tends to increase from childhood into early adulthood (this being the Wilson Effect; Bouchard, 2013)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Bouchard, 2013 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataA further nine usable studies were identified based on the search.
“A further nine usable studies were identified based on the search (Blankson & McArdle, 2015;Dalliard, 2013;Fuerst et al., 2023;Hu, 2025;Kane, 2004Kane, , 2007;;Kane & Brand, 2008; National Academy of Sciences [NAS], 1921;Shibaev & Fuerst, 2026).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataReanalysis of raw data netted four additional effect sizes (MIDUS-II and MIDUS Refresher with the Milwaukee African American sample; Woodley of Menie et al., 2015, and two further effect sizes from Osborne's [1980] study).
“This netted four additional effect sizes (MIDUS-II and MIDUS Refresher with the Milwaukee African American sample; Woodley of Menie et al., 2015, and two further effect sizes from Osborne's [1980] study).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Woodley of Menie et al., 2015 source
- cites Osborne's [1980]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the meta-analysis of Spearman's Hypothesis in US Black-White comparisons, the pooled effect size (vector correlation) is large, r = .745, 95% CI [.699, .792], with modest between-effect-size heterogeneity.
“The meta-analysis of SH in US W-B comparisons yields evidence of a large-magnitude effect size (r=.745,95% CI [.699, .792]),exhibiting modest between-effect size heterogeneity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFunnel-plot diagnostics using Fisher-z-transformed effects indicated significant unadjusted Egger's asymmetry, but this became non-significant after adjustment for the moderators.
“Funnel-plot diagnostics using Fisher-z-transformed effects indicated significant unadjusted Egger's asymmetry, but this became non-significant after adjustment for the moderators.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThirty-one usable studies yielding 44 independent effect sizes were identified, with a total harmonic N of 1,039,379.
“Thirty-one usable studies yielding 44 independent effect sizes were identified, with a total harmonic N of 1,039,379.”
- Also stated in: § Meta-analytic search · plain
“The total yield was of 31 studies comprising 44 independent effect sizes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Meta-analytic search · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong unadjusted (z-transformed) effect sizes, funnel asymmetry plots yielded indications of significant asymmetry; when moderator-controlled values were used, the asymmetry became non-significant.
“Amongst the unadjusted (z-transformed) effect sizes, funnel asymmetry plots yielded indications of significant asymmetry, however when moderator-controlled values were used, the asymmetry became non-significant.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningThe search yielded an additional two studies and four effect sizes from studies reporting data based on scholastic attainment criteria or g loadings from elementary cognitive tasks.
“This yielded an additional two studies and four effect sizes (Jensen, 1993;Warne, 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe age moderator coefficient remained negative after every leave-one-out iteration and was significant in 21 out of 31 iterations, with B values ranging from -.006 to -.002 per year, and an average LOO p≈.051.
“The coefficient remained negative after every iteration (involving the removal of one of the 31 studies) and was significant 21 out of 31 iterations, with B values ranging from -.006 to -.002 per year, and an average LOO p≈.051.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The mean or midpoint sample ages sourced from studies or inferred are accurate.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMulti-group confirmatory factor analysis has repeatedly found that both weak and strong forms of measurement invariance obtain in US W-B differences, with g accounting for between 51% and 100% of the variance in the group difference across studies.
“Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis (MGCFA) has however repeatedly found that both weak and strong forms of measurement invariance obtain in US W-B differences (with g accounting for between 51% and 100% of the variance in the group difference across studies; Lasker et al., 2021, Table 7, p. 24)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lasker et al., 2021 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIncarceration risk is a potentially g-loaded variable, and carceral samples are therefore non-representative of the broader population.
“Carceral samples (specifically those who were tested in situ with respect to the prison system) were also excluded from the meta-analysis as incarceration risk is a potentially g loaded variable, and they are therefore non-representative of the broader population (Jensen, 1992).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jensen, 1992 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThis increase in non-shared environmental variance with age should weaken the organization of group differences around g, causing the vector correlations indexing SH to become attenuated.
“This increase in non-shared environmental variance with age should weaken the orga-nization of group differences around g, causing the vector correlations indexing SH to become attenuated.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationWhen disattenuation corrections are applied, the magnitude of vector correlations will invariably increase.
“When such corrections are applied, the magnitude of vector correlations will invariably increase (Jensen, 1998)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jensen, 1998
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningAge is a prospectively important moderator because it potentially captures rising non-shared environmentality which should weaken Spearman's Hypothesis.
“As noted in the Introduction, age is a prospectively important moderator because it potentially captures rising non-shared environmentality which should weaken SH.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningVariability amongst the vector correlations likely reflects meaningful residual variance and is therefore more than just sampling error, consistent with the action of potential age moderation.
“indicating that variability amongst the vector correlations likely reflects meaningful residual variance and is therefore more than just sampling error, consistent with the action of potential age moderation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSampling error estimates allow for the degree to which between-study variance might be substantive, i.e., due to the action of potential moderators.
“Sampling error estimates allow for the degree to which between-study variance might be substantive, i.e. due to the action of potential moderators (Schmidt & Hunter, 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schmidt & Hunter, 2015 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationA positively signed vector correlation is not necessarily indicative of a g-moderated difference amongst groups.
“A major reason for this is the argument that a positively signed vector cor-relation is not necessarily indicative of a g moderated difference amongst groups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Ashton & Lee, 2005 source
- cites Jensen, 1998
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThis manifests as both a decrease in the additive genetic variance (starting in midlife) and an increase in the nonshared environmental variance components (the anti-Wilson Effect).
“This manifests as both a decrease in the additive (starting in midlife) and an increase in the nonshared environmental variance components (termed the anti-Wilson Effect; Sarraf et al., 2023Sarraf et al., , 2025, Fig. 1, p. 2, see also Morris et al., 2025 for similar findings in relation to age-dependent increases in non-shared environmentality amongst younger cohorts).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
PremisereasoningIf group differences are substantially influenced by narrower cognitive abilities, test-specific sources of variance, measurement error, or environmental perturbations not strongly aligned with g, then the vector correlation should be weaker.
“If group differences are instead substantially influenced by narrower cognitive abilities, test-specific sources of variance, measurement error, or environmental perturbations that are not strongly aligned with g (such as those stemming from the nonshared environment), then the vector correlation should be weaker.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationSubtest number is likely related to the nomological breadth of a given battery, and nomological breadth strongly influences the stability of vector correlations.
“Secondly, the requirement for a minimum of four subtests was tightened to five, as subtest number is likely related to the nomological breadth of a given battery, and nomological breadth strongly influences the stability of vector correlations (Jensen, 1998).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jensen, 1998
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationDifferences with respect to non-g latent variables (such as group factors) can generate the appearance of g-moderated differences when a battery is sufficiently nomologically unbalanced with respect to the sampling of cognitive domains.
“Differences with respect to non-g latent variables (such as group factors) can generate the appearance of g moderated differences in instances where a battery is sufficiently nomologically unbalanced with respect to the sampling of cognitive domains (Ashton & Lee, 2005;Jensen, 1998).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Ashton & Lee, 2005 source
- cites Jensen, 1998
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
The paper relies on this without support.
The included samples are representative of the US White and Black populations.
“Carceral samples (specifically those who were tested in situ with respect to the prison system) were also excluded from the meta-analysis as incarceration risk is a potentially g loaded variable, and they are therefore non-representative of the broader population (Jensen, 1992).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The mean or midpoint sample ages sourced from studies or inferred are accurate.
“Mean (or midpoint) sample ages were sourced from the studies or were inferred based on additional criteria.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Study year is a valid proxy for secular trends or Decline Effects.
“Finally, study year was also included to test for the possibility of secular trends or so-called Decline Effects (decreases in effect sizes over time) perhaps reflecting selective reporting early in the research paradigm (e.g., Schooler, 2011).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The subtest g-loadings used from each study are valid measures of g.
“The primary effect size is the (uncorrected) vector correlation between subtest g-loadings and W-B subtest-level differences.”
Statistics recomputed
Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.
- ConsistentF(1, 41) = 0.002reported p = .962 · recomputed p = .965
“F(1,41)=.002,p = .962”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Self-check results appear here once an independent check has confirmed them.
Cites
Matplotlib: a 2D graphics environment
Hunter, J. D. (2007) · Computing in Science & Engineering · doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.55 · Cited by 39,249 · see citing works
SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python
Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., Haberland, M., Reddy, T., Cournapeau, D., Burovski, E., Peterson, P., Weckesser, W., Bright, J., et al. (2020) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 · Cited by 38,430 · see citing works
Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., Gommers, R., Virtanen, P., Cournapeau, D., Wieser, E., Taylor, J., Berg, S., Smith, N. J., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 · Cited by 23,826 · see citing works
Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x · Cited by 14,099 · see citing works
Data Structures for Statistical Computing in Python
McKinney, W. (2010) · Proceedings of the Python in Science Conferences · doi:10.25080/majora-92bf1922-00a · Cited by 11,511 · see citing works
Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2015) · doi:10.4135/9781483398105 · Cited by 5,542 · see citing works
Klockars, A. J., & Sax, G. (1986) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781412985185 · Cited by 1,015 · see citing works
Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children
Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (1983) · PsycTESTS Dataset · doi:10.1037/t27677-000 · Cited by 1,011 · see citing works
Unpublished results hide the decline effect
Schooler, J. W. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/470437a · Cited by 335 · see citing works
ROTH, P. L., BEVIER, C. A., BOBKO, P., SWITZER, F. S., & TYLER, P. (2001) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00094.x · Cited by 325 · see citing works
Sternberg, R. (2006) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2006.01.002 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
The nature of the black–white difference on various psychometric tests: Spearman's hypothesis
Jensen, A. R. (1985) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00020392 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Sex, race, residence, region, and education differences on the 11 WAIS-R subtests.
Kaufman, A. S., McLean, J. E., & Reynolds, C. (1988) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/1097-4679(198803)44:2 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
The Wilson Effect: The increase in heritability of IQ with age
Bouchard, T. J. (2013) · Twin Research and Human Genetics · doi:10.1017/thg.2013.54 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Comparison of black-white differences on the WISC-R and the K-ABC: Spearman's hypothesis
Naglieri, J. A., & Jensen, A. R. (1987) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0160-2896(87)90024-9 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E., & Raju, N. S. (1988) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.73.4.665 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Spearman's Hypothesis tested with chronometric information-processing tasks
Jensen, A. R. (1993) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0160-2896(93)90039-8 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Reynolds, C. R., & Gutkin, T. B. (1981) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(81)90021-0 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
The rise and fall of the Flynn Effect as a reason to expect a narrowing of the Black–White IQ gap☆
Rushton, J. P., & Jensen, A. R. (2010) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2009.12.002 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Problems with the method of correlated vectors
ASHTON, M., & LEE, K. (2005) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2004.12.004 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
A comparison of the factor structures of mental abilities in four ethnic groups.
Hennessy, J. J., & Merrifield, P. R. (1976) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-0663.68.6.754 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Blankson, A. N., & McArdle, J. J. (2015) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences · doi:10.1093/geronb/gbt106 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
A comparison of the factor structures of mental abilities in four ethnic groups.
Hennessy, J. J., & Merrifield, P. R. (1976) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.68.6.754 · Cited by 41
Spearman's Hypothesis: Methodology and Evidence
Jensen, A. (1992) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2702_5 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Testing Spearman's hypotheses using a bi-factor model with WAIS-IV/WMS-IV standardization data
Frisby, C. L., & Beaujean, A. A. (2015) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2015.04.007 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Global Ancestry and Cognitive Ability
Lasker, J., Pesta, B. J., Fuerst, J. G. R., & Kirkegaard, E. O. W. (2019) · Psych · doi:10.3390/psych1010034 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
The influence of race on 3-year-old children's performance on the Stanford-Binet: Fourth edition
Peoples, C. E., Fagan, J. F., & Drotar, D. (1995) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0160-2896(95)90039-x · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Group Differences on US Air Force Pilot Selection Tests
Carretta, T. R. (1997) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/1468-2389.00051 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
What Is a Racially and Culturally Nondiscriminatory Test?
Mercer, J. R. (1984) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-4658-6_9 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Testing Spearman's hypothesis with advanced placement examination data
Warne, R. T. (2016) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2016.05.002 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Spearman’s Hypothesis Tested on Black Adults: A Meta-Analysis
Te Nijenhuis, J., & Van den Hoek, M. (2016) · Journal of Intelligence · doi:10.3390/jintelligence4020006 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Hu, M., Lasker, J., Kirkegaard, E., & Fuerst, J. (2019) · Psych · doi:10.3390/psych1010017 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Nonshared environment: Real but random
Gidziela, A., Malanchini, M., Rimfeld, K., McMillan, A., Ronald, A., Viding, E., Pike, A., Asbury, K., Eley, T., von Stumm, S., et al. (2022) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines · doi:10.1002/jcv2.12229 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Woodley of Menie, M. A., Figueredo, A. J., Dunkel, C. S., & Madison, G. (2015) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.05.032 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Warne, R. T. (2021) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.5406/amerjpsyc.134.4.0479 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Social adversity reduces polygenic score expressivity for general cognitive ability, but not height
Peñaherrera-Aguirre, M., Woodley, M. A., Sarraf, M. A., & Beaver, K. M. (2022) · Twin Research and Human Genetics · doi:10.1017/thg.2022.3 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Self-citationWoodley of Menie, M. A., Fernandes, H. B. F., Kanazawa, S., & Dutton, E. (2018) · HOMO · doi:10.1016/j.jchb.2018.06.003 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
The black–white factor is <i>g</i>
Gordon, R. A. (1985) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00020501 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Fuerst, J. G. R., Shibaev, V., & Kirkegaard, E. O. W. (2023) · Mankind Quarterly · doi:10.46469/mq.2023.63.4.2 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Group Differences in Nonverbal Intelligence: Support for the Influence of Spearman’s g
Kane, H. D. (2007) · Mankind Quarterly · doi:10.46469/mq.2007.48.1.2 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Testing Spearman’s Hypothesis with Alternative Intelligence Tests: A Meta-Analysis
Nijenhuis, J. T., van den Hoek, M., & Willigers, D. (2017) · Mankind Quarterly · doi:10.46469/mq.2017.57.4.12 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Spearman's Hypothesis in the Vietnam Experience Study and National Longitudinal Survey of Youth '79
Lasker, J., Nyborg, H., & Kirkegaard, E. O. W. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/m4yn9 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Sarraf, M. A., Woodley of Menie, M. A., & Peñaherrera-Aguirre, M. (2023) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2022.111969 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citationMechanisms of developmental change in genetic and environmental influences on intelligence
Morris, D. M., Ritchie, S. J., & Plomin, R. (2024) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/uqybg · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Spearman’s Hypothesis: Support from the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Third Edition
Kane, H. D., & Brand, C. (2008) · Mankind Quarterly · doi:10.46469/mq.2008.49.1.1 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Woodley of Menie, M. A., Peñaherrera-Aguirre, M., & Sarraf, M. A. (2025) · Intelligence & Cognitive Abilities · doi:10.65550/001c.140843 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citationGene expressivity on educational attainment increases with age, and then slows
Sarraf, M. A., Woodley of Menie, M. A., Peñaherrera-Aguirre, M., & Ujma, P. P. (2025) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2024.112850 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationHu, M. Z. (2025) · OpenPsych · doi:10.26775/op.2025.07.18 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Black-White differences in an English vocabulary test using an online Prolific sample
Kirkegaard, E. O. W., & Hu, M. (2025) · OpenPsych · doi:10.26775/op.2025.10.10 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Spearman’s Hypothesis Tested Between and Within Genetic Ancestry Groups in the HRS-HCAP SamplePreprint
Сергеевич, Ш. В., & Fuerst, J. G. R. (2026) · Qeios · doi:10.32388/0s5gaa
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Dalliard, 2013, Spearman's Hypothesis and racial differences on the DAS-II, Human Varieties
- J. J. Deeks, 2024, Chapter 10: Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses
- Office of Management and Budget, 1997, Revisions to the standards for the classification of federal data on race and ethnicity, Federal Register, 62, 58782
- J. P. Rushton, 1999, Secular gains in IQ not related to the g factor and inbreeding depression – unlike Black-White differences: A reply to Flynn, Personality & Individual Differences, 26, 381
- Authors
- Woodley of Menie, M., Peñaherrera-Aguirre, M., & Sarraf, M.
- Affiliations
- Independent Sector
- University of Arizona
- Independent Sector (US)
- Venue
- Intelligence & Cognitive Abilities
- Publisher
- Finulus, Inc
- Published
- 2026-10-13
- ISSN
- 3069-6488 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7221703585
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 46
- Type
- dissertation
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Intelligence & Cognitive Abilities (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Keywords
- Spearman's hypothesis, general intelligence, vector correlation, sampling error, environmental confounding, racial differences in intelligence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-29.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-29.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review