PreprintCited by 26Political Conflict and GovernancePolitical Theory and DemocracyElectoral Systems and Political Participation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Democracy and Its Vulnerabilities: Dynamics of Backsliding

Abstract

The dream of all politicians is to remain for ever in office. Most governmentsattempt to advance this goal by building popular support within the establishedinstitutional framework. Some, however, seek to protect their tenure in office byundermining institutions and disabling all opposition. The striking lesson of thesuccessful cases of backsliding is that governments need not take unconstitutional orundemocratic steps to secure domination and yet the cumulative effect is that unlesscitizens react early they may lose the ability to remove the incumbent government bydemocratic means. We investigate what makes democracy vulnerable to such steps,specifically, whether a government would take anti-democratic steps, whether it canbe stopped short of realization of complete domination, and whether it is likely to beremoved at any stage of the process

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.31235/osf.io/4yw98

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Even subtle actions that many fear are the dominant mode of contemporary authoritarianism and backsliding typically are reflected in election results.

    “Even the types of subtle actions that many fear are the dominant mode of contemporary authoritarianism and backsliding (Guriev and Treisman 2020; Luo and Przeworski 2019; Przeworski 2019) typically are reflected in election results.”

    From Measuring Democratic Backsliding (2024) · cites this paper as Luo and Przeworski 2019

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Measuring Democratic Backsliding

    Little, A. T., & Meng, A. (2024) · PS: Political Science & Politics · doi:10.1017/s104909652300063x · Cited by 121

    “Even the types of subtle actions that many fear are the dominant mode of contemporary authoritarianism and backslid-ing (Guriev and Treisman 2020; Luo and Przeworski 2019; Prze-worski 2019) typically are reflected in election results.”

Metadata

Authors
Luo, Z., & Przeworski, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • New York University (US)
Published
2019-12-09
OpenAlex
W4238543755
Cited by
26
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Keywords
democratic backsliding, democratic resilience, government tenure, institutional erosion, opposition suppression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review