Cited by 4Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal DisordersOccupational Health and Safety in WorkplacesOccupational Health and Safety Management

Ergonomic Risk Identification and Postural Analysis in Electrical Transformers Manufacturing Company located in Southern India

Open access
Biradar, Vidyadhar G, Hebbal, S S, Qutubuddin, S M·2024·International Journal of Occupational Safety and Health

Abstract

Introduction: Musculoskeletal disorders are the major factors resulting in discomfort at work in manufacturing industries to workers and these conditions contribute to the poor health of the workforce, subsequently to lower productivity. Therefore, the design of a workstation based on Ergonomic principles is becoming significant to reduce the effects of MSD. This study aimed to identify and assess the ergonomic risks associated with the work tasks in the company through posture analysis and develop recommendations for reducing those risks. Methods: About 36 manufacturing workers from five sections were randomly selected for the cross-sectional study. The chosen team members were from Core building, Core winding, Assembly, Tanking and Tank fabrication sections with experience of more than two years. The presence of MSDs was assessed using a Nordic musculoskeletal questionnaire. For postural analysis, Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) and Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA) were utilized. Few selected postures were analysed using CATIAV5 software and improvements reducing the risks of postures were recommended. Results: All of the 36 workers selected for the study were male with a mean age of 32 years and, average experience of 10 years, and 75% of workers had normal body mass index. The MSD questionnaire indicated discomfort of 86% mostly in the lower back portion of the body. The combined findings of RULA and REBA showed that about 44% of postures were in the high-risk group. Conclusion: Well-defined ergonomic interventions such as redesigning the workstation are suggested to reduce awkward postures and manual handling risks, leading to improvement in job performance and productivity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3126/ijosh.v14i2.53692

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

  • Rapid entire body assessment (REBA)

    Hignett, S., & McAtamney, L. (2000) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/s0003-6870(99)00039-3 · Cited by 2,260 · cited 1× · see citing works

    “21,22 The work postures of the body had also been examined manually using the RULA evaluation worksheet and through the use of the Catia-v5 application software to offer a more precise RULA score, body postures alignment and the load's weight had all been set up and entered into the software.”
    Method

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Biradar, V. G., Hebbal, S. S., & Qutubuddin, S. M.
Corresponding author
Biradar, Vidyadhar G
Venue
International Journal of Occupational Safety and Health
Published
2024-03-25
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
144-151
ISSN
  • 2091-0878 (ISSN-L)
  • 2738-9707
OpenAlex
W4393143027
Cited by
4
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Occupational Safety and Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety Management
Keywords
musculoskeletal disorders, ergonomic risk assessment, postural assessment, workstation design, awkward postures, manual handling, Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire, RULA, REBA, ergonomic interventions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review