Cited by 3Criminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisCriminal Justice and PenologyCrime Patterns and Interventions

The debt prison: The effect of court-ordered monetary sanctions on recidivism

Tostlebe, Jennifer Jewel·2018

Abstract

The use of monetary sanctions as part of the punishment process has been a part of the American criminal justice system since colonization. However, there has been little empirical research investigating the effect of financial penalties incurred by criminal offenders and the extent to which such sanctions relate to the likelihood of recidivism. By applying General Strain Theory, this study explores how monetary sanctions, along with demographics and prior offense type, affect the recidivism rates of persons who were incarcerated. Utilizing a sample of 729 first-time prisoners released from Iowa prisons and then followed for three years, secondary data from the Iowa Department of Corrections is paired with self-collected monetary sanction data from Iowa Courts Online to test the hypothesis that court-ordered monetary sanctions affect the recidivism of first-time prisoners in Iowa. Logistic regression analyses suggest there is not a statistically significant association between monetary sanctions and recidivism. However, ROC curve analysis suggests there is an association between monetary sanctions and recidivism. The results also suggest higher total sanction amount decreases time to recidivism, while higher restitution amount increases time to recidivism.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.31274/etd-180810-5061

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Restitution debt may, in contrast to other LFO debt, increase time to recidivism.

    “restitution debt may, in contrast to other LFO debt, increased time to recidivism (Tostlebe, 2017)”

    From Debt, Incarceration, and Re-entry: a Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as Tostlebe, 2017

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tostlebe, J. J.
Affiliations
Iowa State University (US)
Corresponding author
Tostlebe, Jennifer Jewel
Published
2017-01-01
OpenAlex
W2796293800
Cited by
3
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1
Type
dissertation
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
Keywords
financial sanctions, recidivism, fines, general strain theory, restitution, first-time offenders, released prisoners, criminal sanctions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review