The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The 3D Elevation Program: summary of program direction
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the US, there is widespread, freely available lidar data thanks to the USGS 3D Elevation Program; in many other parts of the globe these data are much more limited.
“In the US, thanks to the USGS 3D Elevation Program33, there is widespread, freely available lidar data; however, in many other parts of the globe these data are much more limited.”
From A singular, broadly-applicable model for estimating on- and off-path walking travel rates using airborne lidar data (2024) · cites this paper as [33]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Campbell, M. J., Dennison, P. E., & Butler, B. W. (2017) · International Journal of Wildland Fire · doi:10.1071/wf17031 · Cited by 42
Campbell, M. J., Cutler, S. L., & Dennison, P. E. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-71359-6 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Snyder, G. I.
- Venue
- Fact Sheet
- Publisher
- US Geological Survey
- Published
- 2012
- ISSN
- 2327-6932
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
