Wildfire effects on source-water quality--Lessons from Fourmile Canyon fire, Colorado, and implications for drinking-water treatment
Open accessAbstract
Study Rationale and ApproachThe degree to which wildfire degrades water quality and supply depends on wildfire extent and intensity, postwildfire precipitation, watershed topography, and local ecology.Potential effects of wildfire on municipal water supplies and downstream aquatic ecosystems include the following:• Changes in the magnitude and timing of snowmelt runoff, which influence filling of water-supply reservoirs,• Increased loading of streams by nutrients, dissolved organic carbon, major ions, and metals,• Postfire erosion and transport of sediment and debris to downstream water-treatment plants, water-supply reservoirs, and aquatic ecosystems, and• Changes in source-water chemistry that can alter drinkingwater treatment.The Fourmile Canyon fire in Boulder County, Colorado (September 6-10, 2010) burned 23 percent of the Fourmile Creek Watershed (10 square miles or 2,600 hectares), destroyed more than 160 homes, and was one of the costliest wildfires in Colorado history (figs. 1 and 2).The wildfire left the area at risk of substantial erosion (Ruddy and others, 2010), potentially degrading the water supply of the communities of Pinebrook Hills and Lafayette, which draw water from Fourmile Creek and Boulder Creek downstream of the burned area (fig.2).Mine tailings and waste rock from historical placer and lode mining U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Following the 2010 Fourmile Canyon fire near Boulder, Colorado, in-stream concentrations of aluminum, iron, and manganese were elevated.
“Following the 2010 Fourmile Canyon fire near Boulder, Colorado, in-stream concentrations of aluminum, iron, and manganese also were elevated.59”
From Wildfire and the Future of Water Supply (2014) · cites this paper as [59]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wildland fire ash: Production, composition and eco-hydro-geomorphic effects
Bodí, M. B., Martin, D. A., Balfour, V. N., Santín, C., Doerr, S. H., Pereira, P., Cerdà, A., & Mataix-Solera, J. (2014) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.12.007 · Cited by 714 · see citing works
Wildfire and the Future of Water Supply
Bladon, K. D., Emelko, M. B., Silins, U., & Stone, M. (2014) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es500130g · Cited by 354 · see citing works
Paul, M. J., LeDuc, S. D., Lassiter, M. G., Moorhead, L. C., Noyes, P. D., & Leibowitz, S. G. (2022) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2021wr030699 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Fire, Flood, and Drought: Extreme Climate Events Alter Flow Paths and Stream Chemistry
Murphy, S. F., McCleskey, R. B., Martin, D. A., Writer, J. H., & Ebel, B. A. (2018) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences · doi:10.1029/2017jg004349 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Writer, J. H., & Murphy, S. F.
- Venue
- Fact Sheet
- Publisher
- US Geological Survey
- Published
- 2012
- ISSN
- 2327-6916 (ISSN-L)
- 2327-6932
- OpenAlex
- W1531354337
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Fact sheet (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Quality and Resources Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Water Treatment and Disinfection
- Keywords
- raw water quality, drinking water treatment, sediment transport, dissolved organic carbon, nutrient loading, major ions, metals, snowmelt runoff, mine tailings, Boulder Creek, municipal water supply
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review