Cited by 25Fire effects on ecosystemsWater Quality and Resources StudiesWater Treatment and Disinfection

Wildfire effects on source-water quality--Lessons from Fourmile Canyon fire, Colorado, and implications for drinking-water treatment

Open access
Writer, Jeffrey H., Murphy, Sheila F.·2012·Fact Sheet

Abstract

Study Rationale and ApproachThe degree to which wildfire degrades water quality and supply depends on wildfire extent and intensity, postwildfire precipitation, watershed topography, and local ecology.Potential effects of wildfire on municipal water supplies and downstream aquatic ecosystems include the following:• Changes in the magnitude and timing of snowmelt runoff, which influence filling of water-supply reservoirs,• Increased loading of streams by nutrients, dissolved organic carbon, major ions, and metals,• Postfire erosion and transport of sediment and debris to downstream water-treatment plants, water-supply reservoirs, and aquatic ecosystems, and• Changes in source-water chemistry that can alter drinkingwater treatment.The Fourmile Canyon fire in Boulder County, Colorado (September 6-10, 2010) burned 23 percent of the Fourmile Creek Watershed (10 square miles or 2,600 hectares), destroyed more than 160 homes, and was one of the costliest wildfires in Colorado history (figs. 1 and 2).The wildfire left the area at risk of substantial erosion (Ruddy and others, 2010), potentially degrading the water supply of the communities of Pinebrook Hills and Lafayette, which draw water from Fourmile Creek and Boulder Creek downstream of the burned area (fig.2).Mine tailings and waste rock from historical placer and lode mining U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3133/fs20123095

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Following the 2010 Fourmile Canyon fire near Boulder, Colorado, in-stream concentrations of aluminum, iron, and manganese were elevated.

    “Following the 2010 Fourmile Canyon fire near Boulder, Colorado, in-stream concentrations of aluminum, iron, and manganese also were elevated.59”

    From Wildfire and the Future of Water Supply (2014) · cites this paper as [59]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Writer, J. H., & Murphy, S. F.
Venue
Fact Sheet
Published
2012
ISSN
  • 2327-6916 (ISSN-L)
  • 2327-6932
OpenAlex
W1531354337
Cited by
25
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Fact sheet (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Quality and Resources Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Water Treatment and Disinfection
Keywords
raw water quality, drinking water treatment, sediment transport, dissolved organic carbon, nutrient loading, major ions, metals, snowmelt runoff, mine tailings, Boulder Creek, municipal water supply

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review