Cited by 9Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamicsHydrology and Sediment Transport ProcessesEcology and biodiversity studies

Phase 1 studies summary of major findings of the South Bay Salt Pond Restoration Project, South San Francisco Bay, California

Open access
Valoppi, Laura·2018·Open-File Report

Abstract

First posted April 2, 2018 For additional information, contact: Director, Western Ecological Research Center U.S. Geological Survey 3020 State University Drive East Sacramento, California 95819 The South Bay Salt Pond Restoration Project (Project) is one of the largest restoration efforts in the United States. It is located in South San Francisco Bay of California. It is unique not only for its size—more than 15,000 acres—but also for its location adjacent to one of the nation’s largest urban areas, home to more than 4 million people (Alameda, Santa Clara, and San Mateo Counties). The Project is intended to restore and enhance wetlands in South San Francisco Bay while providing for flood management, wildlife-oriented public access, and recreation. Restoration goals of the project are to provide a mosaic of saltmarsh habitat to benefit marsh species and managed ponds to benefit waterbirds, throughout 3 complexes and 54 former salt ponds.Although much is known about the project area, significant uncertainties remain with a project of this geographic and temporal scale of an estimated 50 years to complete the restoration. For example, in order to convert anywhere from 50 to 90 percent of the existing managed ponds to saltmarsh habitat, conservation managers first enhance the habitat of managed ponds in order to increase use by waterbirds, and provide migratory, wintering, and nesting habitat for more than 90 species of waterbirds. Project managers have concluded that the best way to address these uncertainties is to carefully implement the project in phases and learn from the outcome of each phase. The Adaptive Management Plan (AMP) identifies specific restoration targets for multiple aspects of the Project and defines triggers that would necessitate some type of management action if a particular aspect is trending negatively. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) biologist Laura Valoppi served as the project Lead Scientist and oversaw implementation of the AMP in coordination with other members of the Project Management Team (PMT), comprised of representatives from the California State Coastal Conservancy, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, the Santa Clara Valley Water District, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.To implement the AMP, the PMT have selected and funded applied studies and monitoring projects to address key uncertainties. This information is used by the PMT to make decisions about current management of the project area and future restoration actions in order to meet project.This document summarizes the major scientific findings from studies conducted from 2009 to 2016, as part of the science program that was conducted in conjunction with Phase 1 restoration and management actions. Additionally, this report summarizes the management response to the study results under the guidance of the AMP framework and provides a list of suggested studies to be conducted in “Phase 2–A scorecard summarizing the Project’s progress toward meeting the AMP goals for a range of Project objectives.” The scoring to date indicates that the Project is meeting or exceeding expectations for sediment accretion and western snowy plover (Charadrius alexandrinus nivosus) recovery. There is uncertainty with respect to objectives for California gulls (Larus californicus), California least tern (Sternula antillarum), steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), and regulatory water quality objectives. Water quality and algal blooms, specifically of the managed ponds, is indicated as trending negative. However, the vast majority of objectives are trending positive, including increased abundance for a number of bird guilds, increasing marsh habitat, maintenance of mudflats, visitor experience, estuarine fish numbers, and special-status marsh species numbers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3133/ofr20181039

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Commercial salt pond restoration creates a pattern of habitat patches with interacting water quality, primary production, and sediment dynamics.

    “Commercial salt pond restoration creates a pattern of habitat patches with interacting water quality, primary production, and sediment dynamics (Valoppi 2018).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. Valoppi, L., Ackerman, S., De La Cruz, C., Robinson-Nilsen, K., Tokatlian, C., and Strong, 2015, South San Francisco Bay salt pond restoration-Adaptive management in action: Presentation at the Biennial State of the Estuary Conference, 13th Oakland, Calif., September 17-18, 2015, http://www.sfestuary.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/SOE2015ProgramV2.pdf.
  2. Valoppi, L., Bourgeois, J., and Strong, C., 2014a, Communicating science-South Bay salt pond restoration project: Sacramento, Calif., Bay-Delta Science Conference, October 28-30, 2014, poster presentation,http://www.southbayrestoration.org/science/BDSC2014/ BayDelta_Communicating%20Science_2014_Poster_Valoppi_Final.pdf.
  3. Valoppi, L., Bourgeois, J., and Strong, C., 2014b, South Bay restoration project-Adaptive management in action: Sacramento, Calif., Bay-Delta Science Conference, October 28-30, 2014, http://www.southbayrestoration.org/science/BDSC2014/ BayDelta_AM%20in%20Action_2014_Poster_Valoppi_Final.pdf.
  4. Foxgrover, A.C., Finlayson, D.P., Jaffe, B.E., and Fregoso, T.A., 2014, Bathymetry and digital elevation models of Coyote Creek and Alviso Slough, South San Francisco Bay, California (ver. 3.0, September 2015): U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2011-1315, 20 p., http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/ofr20111315. · DOI
  5. Fulfrost, B., Byrd, K., Valoppi, L., Foxgrover, A., De la Cruz, S., Chen, Y., and Thomson, D., 2015, Incorporating the Coastal Blue Band into a remote sensing toolkit for mapping intertidal mudflats in South SF Bay [poster]: State of the San Francisco Estuary Conference, Oakland, Calif., September 17-18, 2015.
  6. Fulfrost, B., Byrd, K., Valoppi, L., Foxgrover, A., Jaffe, B., Thomson, D., Chen, Y., and De La Cruz, S., 2015, Incorporating the Coastal Blue Band (CBB) aboard satellites and unmanned aerial surveillance (UAS)-A remote sensing toolkit for mapping intertidal mudflats in South SF Bay [presentation]: 2015 Science Symposium, Mountain View, Calif., October 22, 2015, http://www.southbayrestoration.org/science/2015symposium/ presentations/3_9_45_Byrd_Fulfrost_MudFlats_ScienceSymposia2015.pdf.
  7. Schoellhamer, D., Shellenbarger, G., and Downing-Kunz, M., 2015, South Bay suspended-sediment concentration and supply [presentation]: 2015 Science Symposium, Mountain View, Calif., October 22, 2015, http://www.southbayrestoration.org/science/2015symposium/ presentations/4_10_00_Schoellhamer%20sbay%20sci%20sym%20Oct%2022%202015.pdf.
  8. Schoellhamer, D., Shellenbarger, G., and Wright, S., 2013, Does central valley runoff control sediment supply to South San Francisco Bay? [presentation]: 2013 Science Symposium, Menlo Park, Calif., July 16, 2013, http://www.southbayrestoration.org/science/2013symposium/ presentations/1%20Schoellhamer%20SBSC%20July%2016%202013%201.pdf.
  9. Schoellhamer, D., Wright, S.A., and Drexler, J.Z., 2013, Adjustment of the San Francisco estuary and watershed to decreasing sediment supply in the 20th century: Marine Geology, v. 345, p. 63-71, DOI: 10.1016/j.margeo.2013.04.007, http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/70094487. · DOI
  10. Shellenbarger, G.G., Downing-Kunz, M.A., and Schoellhamer, D.H., 2014, Suspended-sediment dynamics in the tidal reach of a San Francisco Bay tributary-Proceedings of the 17th Physics of Estuaries and Coastal Seas (PECS) conference, October 19-24, 2014: Porto de Galinhas, Pernambuco, Brazil, http://www.southbayrestoration.org/documents/technical/ shellenbarger_etal_PECS2014_final.pdf.
  11. Valoppi, L., Bourgeois, J., Callaway, J., Jaffe, B., Marvin Di-Pasquale, M., and Shellenbarger, G., 2013, Changing sediment dynamics and mercury remobilization in the South San Francisco Bay Salt Pond Restoration Project: San Diego, Calif., Coastal and Estuarine Research Federation (CERF) Conference, November 3-8, 2013.
  12. Bird Use of Changing Habitats Ackerman, J.T., Hartman, C.A., Herzog, M.P., Smith, L.M., Moskal, S.M., De La Cruz, S.E.W., Yee, J., and Takekawa, J.Y., 2014, The critical role of islands for waterbird breeding and foraging habitat in managed ponds of the South Bay Salt Pond Restoration Project, South San Francisco Bay, California: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2014-1263, 108 p., http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/ofr20141263. · DOI
  13. De La Cruz, S.E.W., Smith, L.M., Moskal, S., Strong, C., Krause, J., Washburn, N., and Takekawa, J.Y., 2015, Evaluating wintering waterbird response to the West Coast's largest tidal marsh restoration project [presentation]: 2015 Science Symposium, Mountain View, Calif., October 22, 2015, http://www.southbayrestoration.org/science/2015symposium/ presentations/13_330DeLaCruz.pdf.
  14. Hartman, A., Ackerman, J., and Herzog, M., 2013, Factors influencing breeding waterbird use of islands in San Francisco Bay, 2013 [presentation]: 2013 Science Symposium, Menlo Park, Calif., July 16, 2013, http://southbayrestoration.org/science/2013symposium/presentations /4%20Hartman%20SBSPRP%20Talk_07162013_rtk.pdf.
  15. Hartman, A., Ackerman, J., and M. Herzog, 2015, Salt pond restoration and breeding birds-Enhancing waterbird nest habitat in managed ponds [presentation]: 2015 Science Symposium, Mountain View, Calif., October 22, 2015, http://www.southbayrestoration.org/science/2015symposium/ presentations/12_3_15_Hartman%20SBSPRP%20Talk_10212015.pdf.
  16. Hartman, C.A., Ackerman, J.T., Herzog, M.P., Strong, C., Trachtenbarg, D., Sawyer, K.A., and Shore, C.A., 2016, Evaluation of Caspian tern (Hydroprogne caspia) and snowy plover (Charadrius alexandrinus nivosus) nesting on modified islands at the Don Edwards San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge, California-2015 Annual Report: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2016- 1049, 36 p., http//dx.doi.org/10.3133/ofr20161049. · DOI
  17. Moskal. S.M., Smith, L.M., De La Cruz, S.E.W., Strong, C., and Shaffer, S.A., 2015, Response of waterbirds to island creation within an estuarine ecosystem [poster]: 2015 Science Symposium, Mountain View, Calif., October 22, 2015, http://www.southbayrestoration.org/science/ 2015symposium/posters/2015%20Moskal%20SBSP%20SciSym%20Poster.pdf.
  18. Takekawa, J.Y., Smith, L.M., Moskal, S.M., and Piotter, S., 2013, Waterbird response to pond management [presentation]: 2013 Science Symposium, Menlo Park, Calif., July 16, 2013, http://www.southbayrestoration.org/science/2013symposium/ presentations/3%20Takekawaetal16July2013h.pdf.
  19. Tokatlian, K., 2015, The effects of salt pond restoration on breeding western snowy plovers [presentation]: 2015 Science Symposium, Menlo Park, Calif., October 22, 2015, http://www.southbayrestoration.org/science/2015symposium/ presentations/SBSPRP%20Symposium_Plover_Tokatlian_nonsync_website.pdf.
  20. Washburn, N., Burns, C., Ackerman, J., Bluso-Demers, J., Robinson-Nilsen, C., and Strong, C., 2015, California gull population growth and response to restoration in South San Francisco Bay [poster]: 2015 Science Symposium, Mountain View, Calif., October 22, 2015, http://www.southbayrestoration.org/science/2015symposium/posters/ Washburn_Science%20Symp%20CAGU%20poster-2.pdf.
  21. Ackerman, J., Herzog, M., Harman, A., Eagles-Smith, C., Slotton, D., and Marvin-DiPasquale, M., 2015, Will the South Bay Salt Pond Restoration Project increase mercury in fish and wildlife? [presentation]: 2015 Science Symposium, Mountain View, Calif., October 22, 2015, http://www.southbayrestoration.org/science/2015symposium/ presentations/10_1_45_Ackerman%20Talk%20Oct21_2015%20V3.pdf.
  22. Ackerman, J.T., Herzog, M.P. Hartman, C.A., Watts, T., and Barr, J., 2014, Waterbird egg mercury concentrations in response to wetland restoration in South San Francisco Bay, California: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2014-1189, 22 p., http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/ofr20141189. · DOI
  23. Downing-Kunz, M., Callaway, J., Livsey, D., Schoellhamer, D., 2017, Sediment-The macro and micro of patterns in the South Bay [presentation]: Oakland, California, 2017 State of the Estuary Conference, October 10-11, 2017, http://www.southbayrestoration.org/science/ SOE2017presentations-posters/presentations/Downing-KunzandCallawaySOE_forPublicRelease.pdf.
  24. Jaffe, B., Foxgrover, A., Fregoso, T., Marvin-DiPasquale, M., Rey, Carlos, Roelvink, D., van der Wegen, M., Achete, F., Shellenbarger, G., and Schoellhamer, D., 2015, Will restoration mobilize mercury in tidal sloughs? [presentation]: 2015 Science Symposium, Mountain View, California, October 22, 2015, http://www.southbayrestoration.org/science/ 2015symposium/presentations/9_1_30_Bruce_mercury.pdf.
  25. Foxgrover, A.C., Finlayson, D.P., Jaffe, B.E., and Fregoso, T.A., 2015, Bathymetry and digital elevation models of Coyote Creek and Alviso Slough, South San Francisco Bay, California (ver. 2, March 2014, ver. 3, September 2015: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2011-1315, 20 p., http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/ofr20111315. · DOI
  26. Foxgrover, A., Jaffe, B., and Fregoso, T., 2015, Mapping bathymetric change in Alviso Slough as salt pond restoration projects progress [presentation]: 2015 Science Symposium in Mountain View, California, October 22, 2015, http://www.southbayrestoration.org/science/2015symposium/ posters/Foxgrover_Alviso%20bathy_symposium_2015.pdf
  27. Marvin-DiPasquale, M., Schoellhamer, D., Downing-Kunz, M., and Shellenbarger, G., 2013, Mercury in motion-Quantifying mercury flux in Alviso Slough [presentation]: Oakland, California, State of the Estuary Conference, October 29-30, 2013, http://www.southbayrestoration.org/science/SOE2013posters/SotE%202013%20Poster%20- %20Alviso%20Hg%20flux%202.pdf.
  28. Fregoso, T.A., Foxgrover, A.C., Jaffe, B.E., and Marvin-DiPasquale, M., 2013, Mercury In motion- Using bathymetric surveys to estimate mercury mobilization from scour of Alviso Slough: Oakland, Calif., 2013 State of the Estuary Conference, October 29-30, 2013, http://www.southbayrestoration.org/science/SOE2013posters/ Fregoso%20Hg%20Bathy%20SOE%202013.pdf.
  29. Slotton, D., 2017, Mercury-Physical and biological insights [presentation]: Oakland, Calif., 2017 State of the Estuary Conference, October 10-11, 2017, http://www.southbayrestoration.org/science/SOE2017presentations- posters/presentations/Slotton%20SOE%20Slides%20(de-animated).pdf. Effects on Aquatic Species
  30. Cook, J.D., 2016, Spatial and temporal trends of fishes and aquatic invertebrates in a restored salt marsh, San Francisco Estuary, CA: Davis, University of California Master's thesis, 42 p., http://gradworks.umi.com/10/12/10124463.html.
  31. Hobbs, J., Cook, J., Crain, P., and Bisson, M., 2015, Lessons learned from restoring solar evaporation ponds in the San Francisco Estuary [poster]: 2015 Science Symposium in Mountain View, Calif., October 22, 2015, http://www.southbayrestoration.org/science/2015symposium/posters/ HobbsPoster_LessonsLearned_SBSP2015.pdf.
  32. Hobbs, J., Cook, J., Crain, P., Buckmaster, N., Bisson, M., Trites, Emily, Parker, C., and Bess, Z., 2015, Effects on aquatic species and water quality-Will aquatic species be affected by restoration? [presentation]: 2015 Science Symposium in Mountain View, California, October 22, 2015, http://www.southbayrestoration.org/science/2015symposium/presentations/ 7_11_30_Hobbs_Effects%20on%20Aquatic%20Species%20and%20Water%20Quality.pdf.
  33. Hobbs, J., Crain, P., La Luz, F., and Cook, J., 2015, Lessons learned from restoring solar evaporation ponds in the San Francisco Estuary [presentation]: Tidal Wetlands Restoration Symposium, Cal-Neva AFS 2015 Annual Meeting, Santa Cruz, California, DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.4782.4886. · DOI
  34. Valoppi, L. Hobbs, J., Bourgeois, J., and Mruz, E., 2014, Successes and challenges of fisheries resources in a large restoration project [presentation]: Cal/Neva American Fisheries Society conference in Sacramento, California, March 27 -29, 2014, http://www.southbayrestoration.org/documents/Valoppi_CalNevaAFS_March_2014-1_Final.pdf.
  35. Hobbs, J., Cook, J., Crain, P., Buckmaster, N., Bisson, M., Trites, Emily, Parker, C., and Bess, Z., 2015, Effects on aquatic species and water quality-Will aquatic species be affected by restoration? [presentation]: 2015 Science Symposium in Mountain View, California, October 22, 2015, http://www.southbayrestoration.org/science/2015symposium/presentations// 7_11_30_Hobbs_Effects%20on%20Aquatic%20Species%20and%20Water%20Quality.pdf.
  36. Novick, E., Downing-Kunz, M., Bresnahan, P., and Senn, D., 2015, Dissolved oxygen in South Bay sloughs [poster]: 2015 Science Symposium in Mountain View, California, October 22, 2015, http://www.southbayrestoration.org/science/2015symposium/posters/ Novick_SBSP%20poster%202015.pdf.
  37. Senn, D., Novick, E., Downing-Kunz, M., Bresnahan, P., and Holleman, R., 2015, Will water quality be affected? [presentation]: 2015 Science Symposium in Mountain View, California, October 22, 2015, http://www.southbayrestoration.org/science/2015symposium/presentations/6_1115_Senn_final.pdf.
  38. Shellenbarger, G.G., and Schoellhamer, D.H., 2011, Continuous salinity and temperature data from San Francisco Estuary, 1982-2002: Trends and the salinity-freshwater inflow relationship: Journal of Coastal Research, v. 27, no., p. 1191-1201.
  39. Topping, B.R., Kuwabara, J.S., Garrett, K.K., Takekawa, J.Y., Parchaso, F., Piotter, S., Clearwater, I., and Shellenbarger, G.G., 2013, Internal nutrient sources and nutrient distributions in Alviso Pond A3W, California: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2013-1128, 17 p., and data tables, http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2013/1128/. Invasive and Nuisance Species Ackerman, J.T., Herzog, M.P., Hartman, C.A., and Herring, G., 2014, Forster's tern chick survival in response to a managed relocation of predatory California gulls: The Journal of Wildlife Management, v. 78, no. 5, p. 818-829, http://www.southbayrestoration.org/documents/technical/ Ackerman%202014%20JWM%20tern%20chick%20survival.pdf.
  40. Ackerman, J.T., Herzog, M.P., Takekawa, J.Y., and Hartman, C.A., 2014, Comparative reproductive biology of sympatric species-Nest and chick survival of American avocets and black-necked stilts: Journal of Avian Biology, v. 45, p. 609-623.
  41. Burns, C.E., Ackerman, J.T., Washburn, N., Bluso-Demers, J., Robinson-Nilsen,C., and Strong, C., 2016, Three decades of California gull population growth and ecological impacts in the San Francisco Bay Estuary: Studies of Western Birds, in press.
  42. Burns, C., and Taketa, E., 2013, California gull population growth and response to Pond A6 breach [presentation]: South Bay Bird Observatory, 2013 Science Symposium in Mountain View, July 16, 2013, http://southbayrestoration.org/science/2013symposium/presentations/ 3%20Burns_ScienceSymposium_Gulls%202.pdf.
  43. Schile L.M., Callaway, J.C., Morris, J.T., Stralberg, D., Parker, V.T., and Kelly, M., 2014, Modeling tidal marsh distribution with sea-level rise-Evaluating the role of vegetation, sediment, and upland habitat in marsh resiliency: PLoS ONE, no. 9, v. 2, e88760. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0088760. · DOI
  44. Stralberg, D., Brennan, M., J.C., Callaway, J.K., Wood, L.M., Schile, D., Jongsomjit, M., Kelly, V.T., Parker, and S., Crooks, 2011, Evaluating tidal marsh sustainability in the face of sea-level rise: A hybrid modeling approach applied to San Francisco Bay" PLoS ONE 6(11): e27388. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0027388. · DOI
  45. Thorne, K.M., Mattsson, B.J., Takekawa, J., Cummings, J., Crouse, D., Block, G., Bloom, V., Gerhart, M., Goldbeck, S., Huning, B., Sloop, C., Stewart, M., Taylor, K., and Valoppi, L., 2015, Collaborative decision-analytic framework to maximize resilience of tidal marshes to climate change: Ecology and Society, v. 20, no. 1, 30 p., http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-07018-200130. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Valoppi, L.
Corresponding author
Valoppi, Laura
Venue
Open-File Report
Published
2018
ISSN
  • 0196-1497 (ISSN-L)
  • 2331-1258
OpenAlex
W2795639902
Cited by
9
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Antarctica A Keystone in a Changing World (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
  • U.S. Geological Survey
  • Western Ecological Research Center, U.S. Geological Survey
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Ecology and biodiversity studies
Keywords
wetland restoration, South San Francisco Bay

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review