Applying cumulative effects to strategically advance large‐scale ecosystem restoration
Open accessAbstract
International efforts to restore degraded ecosystems will continue to expand over the coming decades, yet the factors contributing to the effectiveness of long‐term restoration across large areas remain largely unexplored. At large scales, outcomes are more complex and synergistic than the additive impacts of individual restoration projects. Here, we propose a cumulative‐effects conceptual framework to inform restoration design and implementation and to comprehensively measure ecological outcomes. To evaluate and illustrate this approach, we reviewed long‐term restoration in several large coastal and riverine areas across the US : the greater Florida Everglades; Gulf of Mexico coast; lower Columbia River and estuary; Puget Sound; San Francisco Bay and Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta; Missouri River; and northeastern coastal states. Evidence supported eight modes of cumulative effects of interacting restoration projects, which improved outcomes for species and ecosystems at landscape and regional scales. We conclude that cumulative effects, usually measured for ecosystem degradation, are also measurable for ecosystem restoration. The consideration of evidence‐based cumulative effects will help managers of large‐scale restoration capitalize on positive feedback and reduce countervailing effects.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The paper proposes a cumulative-effects conceptual framework for large-scale ecosystem restoration and reviews US coastal and riverine restoration programs to show that interacting projects can produce beneficial cumulative effects beyond additive project outcomes. It concludes that eight modes of cumulative effects are measurable in restoration and should be incorporated into planning, monitoring, and adaptive management.
Key findings
- Evidence from the reviewed restoration areas supported eight modes of cumulative effects, and every study area showed more than one mode; the authors state this is the first strong, collective evidence of beneficial cumulative effects within large-scale ecosystems.
- In Tampa Bay, advanced wastewater and stormwater treatment since the 1970s reduced total nitrogen inputs by 90%; after improvements in water transparency, chlorophyll-a, and total N loading, seagrass acreage in 2014 exceeded 1996 recovery goals based on 1950s benchmark levels.
- In the northeastern coastal states, salt marsh reconnections in Maine and New Hampshire returned some conditions immediately while others required up to 50 years; after eelgrass was planted at two Gulf of Maine locations, canopy height and biomass developed over 8 years and were followed by increased fish species richness.
- In the Atchafalaya River Delta, water diverted during rising or peak river stages delivers at least twice as much sediment as during falling stages; globally, 57 entities committed to restoring 170 million ha, with estimated economic benefits on the order of US$9 trillion from improved food security, water supply, and biodiversity, plus greater carbon sequestration.
Methods
- The authors adapted stressors-based definitions of eight modes of cumulative effects from CEQ (1997) for application to ecological restoration, ecosystem management, and conservation science.
- They reviewed long-term restoration in several large coastal and riverine areas across the US: the greater Florida Everglades; Gulf of Mexico coast; lower Columbia River and estuary; Puget Sound; San Francisco Bay and Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta; Missouri River; and northeastern coastal states.
- The main analysis is a qualitative case-study synthesis using evidence compiled in WebTables and cited literature; no new primary data collection or quantitative meta-analysis is reported.
Limitations
- Stated: evidence for cumulative effects is often deemed too expensive to fully develop and incorporate into restoration design and evaluation; sociocultural and institutional mechanisms can pose substantial barriers even when the ecology is well understood.
- Stated: resource limitations have sometimes prevented the hypothesis-driven experimentation and monitoring needed to distinguish restoration effects from background trends, and detecting time- or space-crowding effects requires robust statistical modeling and experimental designs.
- Evident from the text: the review is qualitative and case-study based rather than a systematic quantitative test, and the authors note that thresholds, space crowding, and time crowding are not as widely documented in large-scale restoration and should be incorporated where ecological history suggests they are likely to occur.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
23 of 67 cited sources checked · 6 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Positive effects arising from multiple pathways have been observed in Tampa Bay, where watershed-scale nutrient management and local habitat protection and enhancement projects aided seagrass recovery.
“Positive effects arising from multiple pathways have been observed in Tampa Bay, Florida, where watershed-scale nutrient management and local habitat protection and enhancement projects aided seagrass recovery (Beck et al. 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Beck et al. 2019 source
The Introduction reports seagrass recovery in Tampa Bay and says reduced nutrient loading and improved water clarity preceded it. The Discussion links habitat protection to reductions in chlorophyll-a, but says habitat enhancement was not strongly associated with baywide water-quality improvements. The paper does not establish that habitat protection and enhancement projects aided seagrass recovery. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Rain gardens, bioretention, and vegetated roofs moderate runoff events and associated nutrient loads.
“Rain gardens, bioretention, and vegetated roofs moderate runoff events and associated nutrient loads (Pennino et al. 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Pennino et al. 2016 source
The Conclusions report that stormwater green infrastructure reduced flashy hydrology and nitrogen exports at the watershed scale. But §3.3 found no significant correlation between nutrient exports and any individual infrastructure type, and no significant reduction in phosphorus exports. The paper therefore does not establish that rain gardens, bioretention, and vegetated roofs each moderate runoff and associated nutrient loads. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
In the Florida Everglades, multiple lines of evidence collected over three decades indicate that the effects of water management and restoration projects on food availability during the nesting season are key contributors to nesting success and the sustainability of wading bird populations.
“Similarly, in the Florida Everglades, multiple lines of evidence collected over three decades indicate that the effects of water management and restoration projects on food availability during the nesting season are key contributors to nesting success and the sustainability of wading bird populations (WebTable 1; Beerens et al. 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Beerens et al. 2015 source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Large-scale restoration is usually more cost-effective than local site-specific planning.
“Large-scale restoration is usually more cost-effective than local site-specific planning (Neeson et al. 2015);”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Neeson et al. 2015 source
The Significance section reports that coordinating restoration across the Laurentian Great Lakes region was nine times more cost-effective than local-scale planning. The claim extends that finding to large-scale restoration generally by saying it is 'usually' more cost-effective; the paper also notes that local opportunities can be worthwhile (Results and Discussion). (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
The direct effects of reconnection on hydrology and sedimentation in turn produce indirect effects on native plants and the aquatic food web.
“The direct effects of reconnection on hydrology and sedimentation in turn produce indirect effects on native plants and the aquatic food web (Thom et al. 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Thom et al. 2018 source
The Accepted Article passages (page unavailable) report that reconnection restored water-level variations, that sediment accretion helped restore marsh elevation and vegetation structure, and that vegetation changed after reconnection. They also describe exported organic matter as a potential contribution to the aquatic food web, but say further research is needed to establish how it is taken up. The paper does not establish the claimed effects on native plants or a demonstrated food-web response. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Where human development isolates ecosystems from natural physical processes, restoration causes an interim period of disruptive hydrologic and sedimentary change.
“Where human development isolates ecosystems from natural physical processes, restoration causes an interim period of disruptive hydrologic and sedimentary change (Day et al. 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Day et al. 2009 source
The Introduction describes levees and closed distributaries isolating Mississippi Delta wetlands from river input. The Summary, Conclusions, and Recommendations reports that reintroducing river water changed freshwater flow and sediment delivery in Breton Sound. It does not establish that restoration generally causes an interim period of disruptive hydrologic and sedimentary change. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
The focus of recovery planning for highly mobile and/or migratory species like the anadromous longfin smelt and Chinook salmon differs from that for solely wetland-dependent species.
“The focus of recovery planning for highly mobile and/or migratory species like the anadromous longfin smelt (Spirinchus thaleichthys) and Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) differs from that for solely wetland-dependent species (Hobbs et al. 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Hobbs et al. 2017 source
The Tidal Marsh Restoration section recommends connecting food-rich marshes to open-water habitats for pelagic fishes, supporting the idea that recovery for smelt involves more than wetland habitat alone. But our copy does not compare recovery planning with solely wetland-dependent species or extend that comparison to Chinook salmon; its recommendations focus on smelt. No page numbers were available in the indexed passages. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
On the Columbia River floodplain, reconnection restores the primary production and export of marsh plants that die back annually, producing detritus that subsidizes organic matter in channels nearby and the food web that supports juvenile salmon.
“On the Columbia River floodplain, reconnection restores the primary production and export of marsh plants that die back annually, producing detritus that subsidizes organic matter in channels nearby and the food web that supports juvenile salmon, among other species (Figure 4, c and d; WebTable 1; Diefenderfer et al. 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Diefenderfer et al. 2016 source
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Much of Hog Island Bay on the Virginia coast lies within a depth range where vegetated seagrass meadows with relatively clear water or unvegetated seabeds with turbid water are alternative stable states.
“Much of Hog Island Bay on the Virginia coast lies within a depth range where vegetated seagrass meadows with relatively clear water or unvegetated seabeds with turbid water are alternative stable states (Carr et al. 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Carr et al. 2010 source
Section 3.1 reports that vegetated and bare seabeds are alternative stable states at depths of 2.2–3.6 m in Hog Island Bay, consistent with the paper’s account of seagrass reducing turbidity. But under typical conditions, that range covers 23% of the bay, while 51% favors stable seagrass. The Discussion says much of the bay *will* fall into a bistable regime with future depth changes, not that much of it currently lies in one. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Commercial salt pond restoration creates a pattern of habitat patches with interacting water quality, primary production, and sediment dynamics.
“Commercial salt pond restoration creates a pattern of habitat patches with interacting water quality, primary production, and sediment dynamics (Valoppi 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Valoppi 2018 source
- Premisecitation
Habitat conditions influence bird dispersal between segments of the Missouri River and other nesting habitats in tributaries and prairie pothole wetlands, thereby affecting the distribution of birds over a broad geographic area.
“Habitat conditions also influence bird dispersal between segments of the Missouri River and other nesting habitats in tributaries and prairie pothole wetlands, thereby affecting the distribution of birds over a broad geographic area (Roche et al. 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Roche et al. 2016 source
The Discussion (page unavailable) links changing nesting conditions to Piping Plover dispersal and describes possible movement between Missouri River habitats and alkaline lakes. The Study Area (page unavailable) places those populations across a broad region, but the paper does not identify tributary nesting habitats as part of the dispersal described in the claim; it studies mainstem river and reservoir habitats and Missouri Coteau alkaline lakes. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Higher densities of stormwater treatment areas implemented in watersheds are correlated with watershed-scale reductions in annual peak runoff, high-flow event frequency, coefficient of variation in runoff, and N loads.
“Higher densities of stormwater treatment areas implemented in watersheds are correlated with watershed-scale reductions in annual peak runoff, high-flow event frequency, coefficient of variation in runoff, and N loads (Pennino et al. 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Pennino et al. 2016 source
- Premisecitation
With increasing scale of restoration planning, potential interactions encompass many ecosystem types, plant communities, and species affected by changing landscape patterns and ecological processes.
“With the increasing scale of restoration planning in response to disasters, human population growth, and climate change (Figure 6), potential interactions encompass many ecosystem types, plant communities, and species affected by changing landscape patterns and ecological processes (WebTable 2; Nakano and Murakami 2001; LoSchiavo et al. 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites WebTable 2
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Nakano and Murakami 2001 source
The Results and Discussion passage supports the point that changing habitat interfaces can affect interactions between neighboring communities: it describes broad-scale human alteration of habitat patterns and its effects on exchanges between forests and streams. It does not address restoration planning or establish that such interactions encompass many ecosystem types and plant communities. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites LoSchiavo et al. 2013 source
The section ‘Developing an applied science framework’ (page not provided) describes landscape-scale models spanning South Florida’s major wetland systems, and the Background notes effects on species and habitats. The paper does not establish the broader claim that restoration planning is increasing in scale in response to disasters, population growth, and climate change, or specifically describe interactions across many plant communities. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Water diverted during rising or peak river stages delivers at least twice as much sediment as during falling stages.
“River stage and trend are key factors in timing pulses, because water diverted during rising or peak stages delivers at least twice as much sediment than it does during falling stages (WebTable 1; Day et al. 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites WebTable 1
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Day et al. 2009 source
The Summary, Conclusions, and Recommendations says that diversions during rising or peak Mississippi River stages can deliver two or more times as much sediment per unit of water as diversions during falling stages. The claim presents that potential, per-unit comparison as an unqualified rule; the Suspended Sediment Delivery section reports the underlying comparison of two spring 2003 pulses. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Sociocultural and institutional mechanisms can pose substantial barriers to planning, implementing, and evaluating large-scale ecosystem restoration even when the ecology is well understood.
“Sociocultural and institutional mechanisms can pose substantial barriers to planning, implementing, and evaluating large-scale ecosystem restoration even when the ecology is well understood (Daoust et al. 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Daoust et al. 2014
Section 2.3 (Adaptive Governance; page unavailable) describes significant institutional challenges, including existing planning structures and fragmented political authority, that impede restoration management. Section 2.4 (Linking Science with Management Decision Making; page unavailable) also describes difficulties connecting scientists and decision-makers. The copy does not establish that these barriers persist when the ecology is well understood, or specifically show sociocultural barriers to evaluating restoration. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
Evidence from reviewed long-term restoration in several large coastal and riverine areas across the US supported eight modes of cumulative effects of interacting restoration projects.
“Evidence supported eight modes of cumulative effects of interacting restoration projects, which improved outcomes for species and ecosystems at landscape and regional scales.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In every study area considered, more than one mode of cumulative effects accounted for interactions and ecological consequences of restoration actions.
“In every study area we considered, more than one mode of cumulative effects accounted for interactions and ecological consequences of restoration actions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Managing Missouri River reservoir releases to reduce the threat of inundation of nests on the riverine sandbars downstream conversely increases the threat of inundation of nests on the shorelines of reservoirs upstream.
“Managing Missouri River reservoir releases to reduce the threat of inundation of nests on the riverine sandbars downstream conversely increases the threat of inundation of nests on the shorelines of reservoirs upstream (WebTable 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The eight modes of cumulative effects of interacting restoration projects improved outcomes for species and ecosystems at landscape and regional scales.
“Evidence supported eight modes of cumulative effects of interacting restoration projects, which improved outcomes for species and ecosystems at landscape and regional scales.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Both basin and marsh restoration projects affect hydrodynamic regimes, sediment deposition, elevation deficits, salinity gradients, and land building at overlapping spatiotemporal scales.
“Both basin and marsh restoration projects affect hydrodynamic regimes, sediment deposition, elevation deficits, salinity gradients, and land building at overlapping spatiotemporal scales.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The case studies demonstrated indirect, space-crowding, and time-lag effects on tidal marsh restoration.
“indirect, space-crowding, and time-lag effects on tidal marsh restoration”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
This survey of restoration areas provides the first strong, collective evidence of beneficial cumulative effects within large-scale ecosystems.
“This survey of restoration areas provides the first strong, collective evidence of beneficial cumulative effects within large-scale ecosystems.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The restoration areas surveyed are representative of large-scale ecosystem restoration generally.
- Findingnone given
The case studies demonstrated indirect and cross-boundary effects on bird and salmon populations.
“indirect and cross-boundary effects on bird and salmon populations”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
We observed cross-boundary effects after man-made barriers were removed.
“cross-boundary effects after man-made barriers were removed”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
We observed compounding effects after multiple stressors were reduced.
“we observed compounding effects after multiple stressors were reduced”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
The site-scale outcomes of individual restoration projects are influenced by watershed- and landscape-scale processes, and by other restoration sites.
“The site-scale outcomes of individual restoration projects are influenced by watershed-and landscape-scale processes, and by other restoration sites.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Threshold effects occurred where phase shifts had previously degraded the system.
“threshold effects occurred where phase shifts had previously degraded the system”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
We observed more than one mode of cumulative effect in each case study.
“We observed more than one mode of cumulative effect in each case study.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The case studies demonstrated threshold and compounding effects on seagrass recoveries.
“The case studies discussed here demonstrated both threshold and compounding effects on seagrass recoveries”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Using available tools to incorporate cumulative effects mechanisms into the existing ecosystem approach is a suitable strategy for improving the effectiveness of restoration and adaptive management at large scales.
“On balance, our findings indicated that using available tools to incorporate cumulative effects mechanisms into the existing ecosystem approach (WebTable 3) is a suitable strategy for improving the effectiveness of restoration and adaptive management at large scales.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Low-impact development such as stormwater green infrastructure provides opportunities for the management of rivers, stormwater, and treated-sewage runoff to support ecosystem restoration.
“Low-impact development such as stormwater green infrastructure provides opportunities for the management of rivers, stormwater, and treated-sewage runoff to support ecosystem restoration (Greening et al. 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Greening et al. 2016 source
- Premisecitation
After 40 years of nutrient enrichment on a Long Island Sound embayment in Connecticut, removal of a nutrient source induced a shift from an algae-dominated ecosystem to an eelgrass-dominated ecosystem within 15 years.
“After 40 years of nutrient enrichment on a Long Island Sound embayment in Connecticut, removal of a nutrient source induced a shift from an algae-dominated ecosystem to an eelgrass-dominated ecosystem within 15 years (Vaudrey et al. 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Vaudrey et al. 2010 source
- Premisecitation
Reconnection of estuarine habitat on the Oregon coast resulted in greater life-history diversity for a population of coho salmon.
“and reconnection of estuarine habitat on the Oregon coast resulted in greater life-history diversity for a population of coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch; Jones et al. 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jones et al. 2014 source
- Interpretationreasoning
Positive feedback occurred as seagrasses modified the underwater light environment.
“In these instances, positive feedback occurred as seagrasses modified the underwater light environment (Figure 4, a and b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
On the tidal river and estuarine floodplain of the Columbia River, the wetland restoration program reconnects formerly diked lands to riverine hydrology.
“On the tidal river and estuarine floodplain of the Columbia River on the Oregon–Washington border, for example, the wetland restoration program reconnects formerly diked lands to riverine hydrology (Ebberts et al. 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ebberts et al. 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
After system-wide improvements in water transparency, chlorophyll-a concentration, and total N loading rates, seagrass acreage in Tampa Bay in 2014 exceeded recovery goals established in 1996 based on 1950s benchmark levels.
“After system-wide improvements in numerical water transparency, chlorophyll-a concentration, and total N loading rates, seagrass acreage in 2014 exceeded recovery goals established in 1996 based on 1950s benchmark levels (WebTable 1; Greening et al. 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Greening et al. 2016 source
- Premisereasoning
Rivers present cross-boundary effects when management actions alter reservoir releases or channel configuration.
“Rivers present cross-boundary effects when management actions alter reservoir releases or channel configuration.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Cumulative effects, usually measured for ecosystem degradation, are also measurable for ecosystem restoration.
“We conclude that cumulative effects, usually measured for ecosystem degradation, are also measurable for ecosystem restoration.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
Wetland primary production is re-established through interactions of soil microbes, minerals, and nutrients with the evolving plant community.
“Wetland primary production is re-established through interactions of soil microbes, minerals, and nutrients with the evolving plant community, whether planted or derived from natural sources in the ecosystem.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Initially, remnant plants intolerant of restored environmental conditions are eliminated.
“Initially, remnant plants intolerant of restored environmental conditions are eliminated (Burdick et al. 1997), in some cases producing surfaces with few vascular plants analogous to mine reclamation, the origin of restoration ecology (Bradshaw 1987).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Burdick et al. 1997
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Sites with less-disturbed conditions are incorporated as reference sites or targets for the trajectories of restored sites.
“Sites with less-disturbed conditions are incorporated as reference sites or targets for the trajectories of restored sites (Raposa et al. 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Raposa et al. 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
The density of restoration projects can produce space-crowding effects through ecosystem processes such as water flow.
“There are theoretical limits on the maximum restoration benefit for a given geographic area, and the density of restoration projects can produce space-crowding effects through ecosystem processes (eg water flow; Diefenderfer et al. 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Diefenderfer et al. 2012 source
- Premisecitation
Advanced wastewater and stormwater treatment since the 1970s reduced total nitrogen inputs into Tampa Bay by 90%.
“Advanced wastewater and stormwater treatment since the 1970s reduced total nitrogen (N) inputs into the Bay by 90%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Greening et al. 2016 source
- Premisecitation
Infrastructure in urbanized or otherwise highly engineered basins influences basin-scale processes and flow dynamics, and consequently the trajectories of functional development at restored sites.
“Infrastructure in urbanized or otherwise highly engineered basins influences basin-scale processes and flow dynamics, and consequently the trajectories of functional development at restored sites (Simenstad and Thom 1996).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Simenstad and Thom 1996 source
- Interpretationnone given
When stormwater systems are designed to maximize efficient transport, event-driven spikes in land-use-related contaminants limit the potential for downstream ecosystem restoration and species recovery.
“When stormwater systems are designed to maximize efficient transport, event-driven spikes in land-use-related contaminants limit the potential for downstream ecosystem restoration and species recovery.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
On the Missouri River, newly created sandbar or reservoir shoreline habitats attract breeding pairs of piping plover and least tern.
“On the Missouri River, newly created sandbar or reservoir shoreline habitats attract breeding pairs of piping plover (Charadrius melodus) and least tern (Sternula antillarum) (Figure 5, a and b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Thresholds are often difficult to measure or predict.
“Although thresholds are often difficult to measure or predict (Groffman et al. 2006), understanding the thresholds that determine alternative states is necessary to drive management decisions (WebTable 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Groffman et al. 2006 source
- Interpretationreasoning
For effective large-scale restoration to be triggered by smaller actions, the system state must be moved past conditions such as the critical light availability thresholds separating seagrass and algal systems.
“For effective large-scale restoration to be triggered by smaller actions, the system state must be moved past conditions such as the critical light availability thresholds separating seagrass and algal systems.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
Seagrasses increase the deposition of sediments suspended in water.
“Seagrasses increase the deposition of sediments suspended in water, limit the resuspension of bottom sediments, and capture nutrients that would otherwise promote algal growth.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
Seagrasses capture nutrients that would otherwise promote algal growth.
“Seagrasses increase the deposition of sediments suspended in water, limit the resuspension of bottom sediments, and capture nutrients that would otherwise promote algal growth.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
Seagrasses limit the resuspension of bottom sediments.
“Seagrasses increase the deposition of sediments suspended in water, limit the resuspension of bottom sediments, and capture nutrients that would otherwise promote algal growth.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The compounding effects of managing environmental factors, including the hydropattern, water quality, and spatial extent of contiguous habitat, control the production and concentration of prey in high-quality habitat patches.
“The compounding effects of managing environmental factors, including the hydropattern, water quality, and spatial extent of contiguous habitat, control the production and concentration of prey in high-quality habitat patches (Figure 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Increased implementation of stormwater treatment projects combined with the phase-out of the stormwater-borne contaminant polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) led to the reduction of PBDEs in Puget Sound harbor seals.
“Increased implementation of stormwater treatment projects combined with the phase-out of the stormwater-borne contaminant polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) led to the reduction of PBDEs in Puget Sound harbor seals (Phoca vitulina; Ross et al. 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ross et al. 2013 source
- Interpretationnone given
At large scales, restoration outcomes are more complex and synergistic than the additive impacts of individual restoration projects.
“At large scales, outcomes are more complex and synergistic than the additive impacts of individual restoration projects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
There are theoretical limits on the maximum restoration benefit for a given geographic area.
“There are theoretical limits on the maximum restoration benefit for a given geographic area, and the density of restoration projects can produce space-crowding effects through ecosystem processes (eg water flow; Diefenderfer et al. 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Applying cumulative effects together with an ecosystem science foundation helps address programmatic questions in large-scale restoration programs.
“Applying cumulative effects together with an ecosystem science foundation helps to address programmatic questions in large-scale restoration programs (WebTable 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites WebTable 1
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
In the Atchafalaya River Delta, Louisiana, hydrogeomorphic process domains occur across scales from the province to the basin and marsh.
“In the Atchafalaya River Delta, Louisiana, a reference ecosystem on the Gulf of Mexico coast, hydrogeomorphic process domains occur across scales from the province to the basin and marsh”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Twilley et al. 2019 source
- Premisenone given
Despite short hydrodynamic forcing time scales such as tidal, the restoration of geomorphology through ecosystem responses associated with erosion and deposition is usually gradual.
“Despite short hydrodynamic forcing time scales (eg tidal), the restoration of geomorphology through ecosystem responses associated with erosion and deposition is usually gradual.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
These tools allow managers to move beyond prioritizing potential restoration actions or areas in isolation and instead investigate the collective outcome of alternative suites of projects.
“These tools allow managers to move beyond prioritizing potential restoration actions or areas in an isolated manner and instead investigate the collective outcome of alternative suites of projects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Non-linear indirect effects are to be expected in watersheds and on coasts.
“Non-linear indirect effects are to be expected in watersheds and on coasts (Allan 2004).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Allan 2004 source
- Premisecitation
Managing the timing of ecosystem stressors and drivers while depending on natural processes to complete recovery results in time-lag and time-crowding effects.
“Managing the timing of ecosystem stressors and drivers while depending on natural processes to complete recovery results in time-lag and time-crowding effects (Table 1; Carpenter and Turner 2001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Carpenter and Turner 2001
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisenone given
Vegetation and soils take more time to develop a variety of functions, such as biodiversity, carbon storage, resistance to erosion, control of invasive species, microbial activity, and organic matter export.
“Vegetation and soils take more time to develop a variety of functions, such as biodiversity, carbon storage, resistance to erosion, control of invasive species, microbial activity, and organic matter export.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
During restoration, ecosystems respond to disturbances and trends in climate, geological and hydrological processes, and land use, which complicates distinguishing restoration effects from natural variability and other drivers.
“During restoration, ecosystems respond to disturbances and trends in climate, geological and hydrological processes, and land use, which complicates the job of distinguishing the effects of restoration activities from natural variability and other drivers (Luoma et al. 2001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Luoma et al. 2001
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
Pulsing could overcome some of the impacts of diversion-related salinity reduction on fisheries species.
“Pulsing could overcome some of the impacts of diversion-related salinity reduction on fisheries species”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites de Mutsert et al. 2017 source
- Interpretationreasoning
Some research tools have the potential to be cost-effectively repurposed for ecosystem restoration.
“some have the potential to be cost-effectively repurposed for ecosystem restoration”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The frequency, duration, timing, and magnitude of river flows altered by restoration and management affect sensitive systems and organisms.
“The frequency, duration, timing, and magnitude of river flows altered by restoration and management affect sensitive systems and organisms (Allan 2004).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Allan 2004 source
- Interpretationreasoning
The history of impacts on an ecosystem helps point to likely modes of cumulative effects of restoration.
“Yet the history of impacts on an ecosystem helps point to likely modes of cumulative effects of restoration.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Using spatial analysis and modeling to incorporate cumulative-effects mechanisms in forecasting may help avoid unintended consequences and leverage system thresholds and positive feedback between projects to produce dramatic changes in system state.
“Using spatial analysis and modeling to incorporate cumulative-effects mechanisms in forecasting may help to avoid unintended consequences and leverage system thresholds and positive feedback between projects to produce dramatic changes in system state (Groffman et al. 2006).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Groffman et al. 2006 source
- Premisecitation
Without new sediment, river deltas cannot maintain themselves against relative sea-level rise.
“Without new sediment, river deltas cannot maintain themselves against relative sea-level rise (Paola et al. 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Paola et al. 2011
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Numerous examples demonstrate the response of coastal marshes to tidal flow restoration.
“Numerous examples demonstrate the response of coastal marshes to tidal flow restoration (Roman and Burdick 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Roman and Burdick 2012 source
- Premisecitation
Useful tools for capturing interactions across landscapes include conceptual models, analytical frameworks, scenario planning, specialized indices, spatial information, and quantitative hydrogeomorphic and ecological modeling methods.
“Useful tools for capturing interactions across landscapes include conceptual models, analytical frameworks, scenario planning, specialized indices (Nagel et al. 2018), spatial information, and quantitative hydrogeomorphic and ecological modeling methods (WebTable 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Nagel et al. 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites WebTable 3
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
After eelgrass was planted at two locations in the Gulf of Maine, the development of the eelgrass bed canopy height and biomass over 8 years was followed by increased fish species richness.
“After eelgrass was planted at two locations in the Gulf of Maine, the development of the eelgrass bed canopy height and biomass over 8 years was followed by increased fish species richness (Evans and Short 2005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Evans and Short 2005 source
- Interpretationreasoning
Study areas of the largest landscape scales interact with one another.
“Even study areas of the largest landscape scales interact with one another”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Mississippi River Delta receives only a fraction of the vast quantities of sediment historically transported via the Missouri River.
- Rests on an assumption: The Mississippi River Delta and Missouri River restoration areas are not jointly managed for collective objectives.
- May combine two claims. 9
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 30
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHabitat restoration in a Puget Sound watershed measurably increased habitat complexity, which in turn was positively associated with Chinook salmon productivity.
“For instance, habitat restoration in a Puget Sound watershed measurably increased habitat complexity, which in turn was positively associated with Chinook salmon productivity (Hall et al. 2018)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Hall et al. 2018 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSeveral studies have described landscape-scale effects of restorative actions at multiple sites.
“Several studies have described similar landscape-scale effects of restorative actions at multiple sites (eg Diefenderfer et al. 2016; Beck et al. 2019)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationToo little habitat restoration, or restoration of high-risk habitats that attract birds from other locations, may reduce the reproductive output of piping plovers competing for territory.
“Too little habitat restoration, or restoration of high-risk habitats that attract birds from other locations, may reduce the reproductive output of piping plovers competing for territory (Hunt et al. 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Hunt et al. 2018 source
The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that reproductive rates fell as density increased despite engineered habitat creation, and that birds arriving later may have been unable to secure territories. It also describes predation risks on small, densely occupied sandbars, but does not establish that high-risk restored habitat attracted birds from other locations and thereby reduced reproductive output. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationTime lags may impose limits on management control of the system, which need to be addressed by long-term monitoring within adaptive management or structured decision-making frameworks.
“Time lags may impose limits on management control of the system, which need to be addressed by long-term monitoring within adaptive management or structured decision-making frameworks (WebTable 3; Neckles et al. 2015; Ebberts et al. 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Neckles et al. 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Ebberts et al. 2017 source
The Components section describes monitoring over multiple years and using the results to adjust decisions within an adaptive-management process; the Results section says comprehensive evaluation occurs every 4–5 years to allow enough new data to accumulate. The copy does not say that time lags limit management control, or discuss structured decision-making as an alternative framework. Page numbers were not available in the indexed passages. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationDetection of time- or space-crowding effects requires robust statistical modeling and experimental designs.
“The detection of time-or space-crowding effects requires robust statistical modeling and experimental designs (Diefenderfer et al. 2012; Pennino et al. 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Diefenderfer et al. 2012 source
- cites Pennino et al. 2016 source
Section 2.5 (Statistical analysis; page unavailable) describes regression, ANOVA, and control watersheds for detecting effects of stormwater green infrastructure. Our copy does not address time- or space-crowding effects or say what methods their detection requires (searched: crowding effects, statistical modeling, and experimental design). (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAs changes occur, continuing ecosystem management may be more or less active and adaptive according to the decision framework and depending on the results of monitoring.
“As changes occur, continuing ecosystem management may be more or less active and adaptive according to the decision framework and depending on the results of monitoring (WebTable 3; Neckles et al. 2015; Ebberts et al. 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Neckles et al. 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Ebberts et al. 2017 source
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn practice, large-scale restoration is typically overseen by multidisciplinary teams and based on an ecosystem approach developed at the site scale.
“In practice, large-scale restoration is typically overseen by multidisciplinary teams and based on an ecosystem approach developed at the site scale, as can be seen in the programs we reviewed (Figure 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataMultiple restoration and species recovery objectives were identified for each study area.
“Multiple restoration and species recovery objectives were identified for each study area (WebTable 2), and governance models ranged from centralized programs to subregional organization or separately managed projects.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Findingnone givenMany program reports offer simple, additive summaries of project outcomes.
“Many program reports offer simple, additive summaries of project outcomes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe Missouri River Recovery Program used suites of models to evaluate beneficial and countervailing effects of multiple restoration actions on focal species, account for benefits, and prioritize management activity.
“the Missouri River Recovery Program, for example, used suites of models to evaluate the potential for beneficial and countervailing effects of multiple restoration actions on focal species throughout the river system, fully account for benefits, and prioritize management activity (WebTable 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites WebTable 3
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenResource limitations have sometimes prevented the hypothesis-driven experimentation and monitoring needed to distinguish restoration effects from background trends.
“Resource limitations have sometimes prevented the hypothesis-driven experimentation and monitoring needed to distinguish restoration effects from background trends.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Findingnone givenEvaluating the effectiveness of restoration is at present primarily a project-scale endeavor.
“Evaluating the effectiveness of restoration is at present primarily a project-scale endeavor.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn San Francisco Bay and the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, the loss of 90-95% of wetlands within the estuary, extensive habitat loss in the Central Valley, habitat fragmentation, and loss of connectivity severely impact numerous wetland species, including the California Ridgway's rail and salt marsh harvest mouse.
“In San Francisco Bay and the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta, the loss of 90–95% of wetlands within the estuary, extensive habitat loss in the Central Valley, habitat fragmentation, and loss of connectivity severely impact numerous wetland species, including the California Ridgway’s rail (Rallus obsoletus obsoletus) and salt marsh harvest mouse (Reithrodontomys raviventris; Callaway et al. 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Callaway et al. 2012
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLarge-scale restoration of eelgrass in the Virginia Coast Reserve's lower bays improved water clarity, crossing a threshold that led to rapid eelgrass meadow expansion.
“Large-scale restoration of eelgrass (Zostera marina) in the Virginia Coast Reserve’s lower bays improved water clarity, crossing a threshold that led to rapid eelgrass meadow expansion (Orth et al. 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Orth et al. 2012
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationNumerous assessments convincingly demonstrate associations between multiple interacting stressors and declining functions of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems.
“Numerous assessments convincingly demonstrate the associations between multiple interacting stressors and declining functions of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems (Luoma et al. 2001; Darling and Côté 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Luoma et al. 2001
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Darling and Côté 2008 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationEcosystem conceptual models are used to inform decisions about altering controlling factors and reducing stressors to achieve ecological objectives.
“Ecosystem conceptual models are used to inform decisions about altering controlling factors and reducing stressors to achieve ecological objectives (Gentile et al. 2001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gentile et al. 2001 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationRelationships between life histories and habitat connectivity add complex dimensions to restoration planning, monitoring, and evaluation.
“Relationships between life histories and habitat connectivity add complex dimensions to restoration planning, monitoring, and evaluation (WebTable 1; Herbold et al. 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Herbold et al. 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationInteractions between species facilitate restoration.
“and interactions between species facilitating restoration (Halpern et al. 2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Halpern et al. 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationRestoration actions are often intended to catalyze ecological processes to act on the landscape and create the desired system state.
“Restoration actions are often intended to catalyze ecological processes to act on the landscape and create the desired system state (Clewell and Aronson 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Clewell and Aronson 2013 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenCoordinating the management of restoration projects linked by ecological processes and evaluating their collective effectiveness requires understanding how populations and ecosystems are affected by changing spatial patterns, cross-boundary effects, and space crowding across the landscape.
“Coordinating the management of restoration projects linked by ecological processes and evaluating their collective effectiveness requires understanding how populations and ecosystems are affected by changing spatial patterns, cross-boundary effects, and space crowding across the landscape (Table 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningFor species such as smelt and salmon, survival across a mix of habitats in multiple parts of the estuary, tidal river, and watershed must be considered in conjunction with flow management.
“For species such as smelt and salmon, survival across a mix of habitats in multiple parts of the estuary, tidal river, and watershed must be considered in conjunction with flow management.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationGeomorphic conditions and hydrological processes are regarded as ecosystem controlling factors that largely determine ecological structure and function.
“Geomorphic conditions and hydrological processes are regarded as ecosystem controlling factors that largely determine ecological structure and function (Brinson 1993).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Brinson 1993
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningDevelopment of effective regional restoration and management policies requires improved synthesis of interacting project effects across terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems aided by systems models.
“The development of effective regional restoration and management policies requires improved synthesis of interacting project effects across terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems aided by systems models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenA cumulative-effects framework helps account for the non-linearity of the combined effects of restoration projects, particularly where hydrological connectivity of ecosystems is high.
“A cumulative-effects framework helps to account for the non-linearity of the combined effects of restoration projects, particularly where the hydrological connectivity of ecosystems is high.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningRecognizing the individual and interacting ecosystem processes by which effects accumulate is necessary to harness their beneficial work to support the massive scale-up of restoration currently envisioned.
“Recognizing the individual and interacting ecosystem processes by which effects accumulate is necessary to harness their beneficial work to support the massive scale-up of restoration currently envisioned.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The restoration areas surveyed are representative of large-scale ecosystem restoration generally.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenRestoration of large-scale ecosystems will require the same vision and experimentation that was needed in 1972 to clean up lakes and rivers in the US after expansion of the Clean Water Act.
“The restoration of large-scale ecosystems, whether regional landscapes or whole bodies of water, will require the same vision and experimentation that was needed in 1972 to clean up lakes and rivers in the US after expansion of the Clean Water Act.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn salt marsh reconnections in Maine and New Hampshire, some conditions and components such as salinity returned to previous levels immediately, whereas others required up to 50 years.
“In salt marsh reconnections in Maine and New Hampshire, some conditions and components (eg salinity) returned to previous levels immediately, whereas others required up to 50 years (Burdick et al. 1997).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Burdick et al. 1997
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningA cumulative-effects conceptual framework is useful for designing monitoring, synthesis, and evaluation strategies that fully account for and appropriately credit cumulative effects.
“second, to design monitoring, synthesis, and evaluation strategies that fully account for and appropriately credit cumulative effects”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The restoration areas surveyed are representative of large-scale ecosystem restoration generally.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone givenMany research tools have been developed to assess the cumulative impacts of human-caused stressors.
“many research tools have been developed to assess the cumulative impacts of human-caused stressors”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningA cumulative-effects conceptual framework is useful for planning to use ecological synergies beneficially and avoid countervailing effects of projects within interconnected ecosystems.
“the utility of a cumulative-effects conceptual framework for large-scale ecosystem restoration is twofold: first, to plan to use ecological synergies beneficially and avoid countervailing effects of projects within interconnected ecosystems”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The restoration areas surveyed are representative of large-scale ecosystem restoration generally.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningAccounting for cumulative effects is one basis for the advancement of large-scale, evidence-based programs to recover priority species and ecosystems on rivers and coasts worldwide.
“Accounting for cumulative effects is one basis for the advancement of large-scale, evidence-based programs to recover priority species and ecosystems on rivers and coasts worldwide.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The restoration areas surveyed are representative of large-scale ecosystem restoration generally.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationConsidering cumulative effects helps program managers make critical decisions about geographic scope, prioritization, accounting for benefits and unintended consequences, and management triggers and thresholds.
“considering cumulative effects helps program managers make critical decisions about questions (WebTable 1)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites WebTable 1
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationEvidence for cumulative effects theorized to occur in restoration programs is often deemed too expensive to fully develop and incorporate into restoration design and evaluation.
“The evidence for cumulative effects theorized to occur in restoration programs is often deemed too expensive to fully develop and incorporate into restoration design and evaluation (Gilby et al. 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gilby et al. 2018 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationcitationA cumulative-effects approach may be integrated into adaptive management and structured decision-making processes to bring more synthesis and evaluation of project-scale lessons to programs.
“A cumulative-effects approach may be integrated into adaptive management and structured decision-making processes to bring more synthesis and evaluation of project-scale lessons to programs (WebTable 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites WebTable 3
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenMany coastal restoration programs modify landforms, thereby altering water depths.
“For instance, many coastal restoration programs modify landforms, thereby altering water depths.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenUnderstanding the mechanisms of cumulative effects has the potential to unify the multidisciplinary teams of scientists that must address large-scale environmental restoration.
“Understanding the mechanisms of cumulative effects has the potential to unify the multidisciplinary teams of scientists that inevitably must address large-scale environmental restoration.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningPulsing the inflow of diverted water represents an active use of time crowding.
“Pulsing the inflow of diverted water represents an active use of time crowding.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThese findings imply that collaborative understanding and management of cumulative effects are essential for the success of restoration at large scales.
“These findings imply that collaborative understanding and management of cumulative effects are essential for the success of restoration at large scales.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The restoration areas surveyed are representative of large-scale ecosystem restoration generally.
The paper relies on this without support.
Little formal research on achieving successful program-level outcomes of large-scale restoration has been reported.
“however, little formal research on achieving successful program-level outcomes has been reported.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The restoration areas surveyed are representative of large-scale ecosystem restoration generally.
“This survey of restoration areas provides the first strong, collective evidence of beneficial cumulative effects within large-scale ecosystems.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The five modes of cumulative effects listed are the most commonly seen modes in large-scale restoration.
“We suggest that restoration programs also routinely assess the five most commonly seen modes of cumulative effects at landscape or regional scales, consisting of compounding effects, indirect effects, changes in landscape pattern, cross-boundary effects, and time lags (Table 1; Figure 2).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The Mississippi River Delta receives only a fraction of the vast quantities of sediment historically transported via the Missouri River.
“the Mississippi River Delta receives only a fraction of the vast quantities of sediment historically transported via the Missouri River”
The paper relies on this without support.
The Mississippi River Delta and Missouri River restoration areas are not jointly managed for collective objectives.
“the two restoration areas are not jointly managed for collective objectives”
Cites
World map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated
Kottek, M., Grieser, J., Beck, C., Rudolf, B., & Rubel, F. (2006) · Meteorologische Zeitschrift · doi:10.1127/0941-2948/2006/0130 · Cited by 11,456 · see citing works
Landscapes and Riverscapes: The Influence of Land Use on Stream Ecosystems
Allan, J. D. (2004) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.120202.110122 · Cited by 3,626 · see citing works
Depletion, degradation, and recovery potential of estuaries and coastal seas
Lotze, H. K., Lenihan, H. S., Bourque, B. J., Bradbury, R. H., Cooke, R. G., Kay, M. C., Kidwell, S. M., Kirby, M. X., Peterson, C. H., & Jackson, J. B. C. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1128035 · Cited by 3,402 · see citing works
Alternative stable states in ecology
Beisner, B., Haydon, D., & Cuddington, K. (2003) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1890/1540-9295(2003)001[0376:assie]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,385 · see citing works
Reciprocal subsidies: Dynamic interdependence between terrestrial and aquatic food webs
Nakano, S., & Murakami, M. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.98.1.166 · Cited by 1,299 · see citing works
Groffman, P. M., Baron, J. S., Blett, T., Gold, A. J., Goodman, I., Gunderson, L. H., Levinson, B. M., Palmer, M. A., Paerl, H. W., Peterson, G. D., et al. (2006) · Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s10021-003-0142-z · Cited by 1,207 · see citing works
Quantifying the evidence for ecological synergies
Darling, E. S., & Côté, I. M. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01243.x · Cited by 723 · see citing works
A Hydrogeomorphic Classification for Wetlands
Brinson, M. M. (1993) · University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas) · Cited by 692 · see citing works
Natural Processes in Delta Restoration: Application to the Mississippi Delta
Paola, C., Twilley, R. R., Edmonds, D. A., et al. (2010) · Annual Review of Marine Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-marine-120709-142856 · Cited by 331 · see citing works
Self-citationRestoration Ecology. A Synthetic Approach to Ecological Research.
Miles, J., Jordan, W. R., Gilpin, M. E., & Aber, J. D. (1989) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.2307/2403726 · Cited by 292 · see citing works
Long-term nutrient reductions lead to the unprecedented recovery of a temperate coastal region
Lefcheck, J. S., Orth, R. J., Dennison, W. C., Wilcox, D. J., Murphy, R. R., Keisman, J., Gurbisz, C., Hannam, M. P., Landry, J. B., Moore, K. A., et al. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1715798115 · Cited by 273 · see citing works
Response of the Central Canadian Treeline to Recent Climatic Changes
MacDonald, G. M. S. D., Szeicz, J. M., Claricoates, J., & Dale, K. A. (1998) · Annals of the Association of American Geographers · doi:10.1111/1467-8306.00090 · Cited by 265 · see citing works
Functional Equivalency Trajectories of the Restored Gog‐Le‐Hi‐Te Estuarine Wetland
Simenstad, C. A., & Thom, R. M. (1996) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.2307/2269551 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
Self-citationIncorporating positive interactions in aquatic restoration and conservation
Halpern, B. S., Silliman, B. R., Olden, J. D., Bruno, J., & Bertness, M. D. (2007) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[153:ipiiar]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 249 · see citing works
Carr, J., D'Odorico, P., McGlathery, K., & Wiberg, P. (2010) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences · doi:10.1029/2009jg001103 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
Clewell, A. F., & Aronson, J. (2013) · doi:10.5822/978-1-59726-323-8 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Conceptualizing Ecological Responses to Dam Removal: If You Remove It, What's to Come?
Bellmore, J. R., Pess, G. R., Duda, J. J., O’Connor, J. E., East, A. E., Foley, M. M., Wilcox, A. C., Major, J. J., Shafroth, P. B., Morley, S. A., et al. (2018) · BioScience · doi:10.1093/biosci/biy152 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Seed addition facilitates eelgrass recovery in a coastal bay system
Orth, R. J., Moore, K., Marion, S., Wilcox, D. J., & Parrish, D. B. (2011) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps09522 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Enhancing ecosystem restoration efficiency through spatial and temporal coordination
Neeson, T. M., Ferris, M. C., Diebel, M. W., Doran, P. J., O’Hanley, J. R., & McIntyre, P. B. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1423812112 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Hares and Tortoises: Interactions of Fast and Slow Variablesin Ecosystems
Carpenter, S. R., & Turner, M. G. (2000) · Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s100210000043 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Pennino, M. J., McDonald, R. I., & Jaffe, P. R. (2016) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.101 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Ecological responses to tidal restorations of two northern New England salt marshes
Burdick, D. M., Dionne, M., Boumans, R. M. J., et al. (1996) · Wetlands Ecology and Management · doi:10.1007/bf01876233 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Self-citationSpaling, H., & Smit, B. E. (1993) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/bf02393721 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Spatial Restoration Ecology: Placing Restoration in a Landscape Context
Gilby, B. L., Olds, A. D., Connolly, R. M., Henderson, C. J., & Schlacher, T. A. (2018) · BioScience · doi:10.1093/biosci/biy126 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
The Impacts of Pulsed Reintroduction of River Water on a Mississippi Delta Coastal Basin
Day, J. W., Cable, J. E., Cowan, J. H., DeLaune, R., de Mutsert, K., Fry, B., Mashriqui, H., Justic, D., Kemp, P., Lane, R. R., et al. (2009) · Journal of Coastal Research · doi:10.2112/si54-015.1 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Self-citationEcological Knowledge and Environmental Problem Solving: Concepts and Case Studies.
Moss, B. (1987) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.2307/2260216 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Gentile, J. H., Harwell, M. A., Cropper Jr, W., Harwell, C. C., DeAngelis, D., Davis, S., Ogden, J. C., & Lirman, D. (2001) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/s0048-9697(01)00746-x · Cited by 99 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Ecosystem conceptual models are used to inform decisions about altering controlling factors and reducing stressors to achieve ecological objectives (Gentile et al. 2001).”
BackgroundSelf-citationWetland habitats of North America: ecology and conservation concerns
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.50-1458 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
University of California, D., Hobbs, J. A., Moyle, P. B., University of California, D., Fangue, N., University of California, D., Connon, R. E., & University of California, D. (2017) · San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science · doi:10.15447/sfews.2017v15iss2art2 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Aquatic fauna as indicators for Everglades restoration: Applying dynamic targets in assessments
Trexler, J. C., & Goss, C. W. (2008) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.11.001 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Ross, P. S., Noël, M., Lambourn, D., Dangerfield, N., Calambokidis, J., & Jeffries, S. (2013) · Progress in Oceanography · doi:10.1016/j.pocean.2013.05.027 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Lessons Learned from the First Decade of Adaptive Management in Comprehensive Everglades Restoration
LoSchiavo, A. J., Best, R. G., Burns, R. E., Gray, S., Harwell, M. C., Hines, E. B., McLean, A. R., St. Clair, T., Traxler, S., & Vearil, J. W. (2013) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-06065-180470 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Self-citationJones, K. K., Cornwell, T. J., Bottom, D. L., Campbell, L. A., & Stein, S. (2014) · Journal of Fish Biology · doi:10.1111/jfb.12380 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Twilley, R. R., Day, J. W., Bevington, A. E., Castañeda-Moya, E., Christensen, A., Holm, G., Heffner, L. R., Lane, R., McCall, A., Aarons, A., et al. (2019) · Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science · doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2019.106341 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Self-citation(2012) · doi:10.5822/978-1-61091-229-7 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
de Mutsert, K., Lewis, K., Milroy, S., Buszowski, J., & Steenbeek, J. (2017) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.06.029 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Linking Dynamic Habitat Selection with Wading Bird Foraging Distributions across Resource Gradients
Beerens, J. M., Noonburg, E. G., & Gawlik, D. E. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0128182 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Eelgrass recovery after nutrient enrichment reversal
Vaudrey, J. M. P., Kremer, J. N., Branco, B. F., & Short, F. T. (2010) · Aquatic Botany · doi:10.1016/j.aquabot.2010.08.005 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Evidence‐based evaluation of the cumulative effects of ecosystem restoration
Diefenderfer, H. L., Johnson, G. E., Thom, R. M., Buenau, K. E., Weitkamp, L. A., Woodley, C. M., Borde, A. B., & Kropp, R. K. (2016) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1002/ecs2.1242 · Cited by 49 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…reconnection restores the primary production and export of marsh plants that die back annually, producing detritus that subsidizes organic matter in channels nearby and the food web that supports juvenile salmon, among other species (Figure 4, c and d; WebTable 1; Diefenderfer et al. 2016).”
BackgroundSelf-citationManaging for Salmon Resilience in California’s Variable and Changing Climate
Consultant, Herbold, B., Carlson, S. M., & Henery, R. E. (2018) · San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science · doi:10.15447/sfews.2018v16iss2art3 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Neckles, H. A., Lyons, J. E., Guntenspergen, G. R., Shriver, W. G., & Adamowicz, S. C. (2014) · Estuaries and Coasts · doi:10.1007/s12237-014-9822-5 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Self-citationHunt, K. L., Fraser, J. D., Friedrich, M. J., Karpanty, S. M., & Catlin, D. H. (2018) · The Condor · doi:10.1650/condor-17-93.1 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Large river habitat complexity and productivity of Puget Sound Chinook salmon
Hall, J. E., Greene, C. M., Stefankiv, O., Anderson, J. H., Timpane-Padgham, B., Beechie, T. J., & Pess, G. R. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0205127 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Tay Evans, N., & Short, F. T. (2005) · Estuaries · doi:10.1007/bf02696021 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Estuary ecosystem restoration: implementing and institutionalizing adaptive management
Ebberts, B. D., Zelinsky, B. D., Karnezis, J. P., Studebaker, C. A., Lopez‐Johnston, S., Creason, A. M., Krasnow, L., Johnson, G. E., & Thom, R. M. (2018) · Restoration Ecology · doi:10.1111/rec.12562 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Self-citationThom, R. M., Breithaupt, S. A., Diefenderfer, H. L., Borde, A. B., Roegner, G. C., Johnson, G. E., & Woodruff, D. L. (2018) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1002/eap.1759 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Self-citationBeck, M. W., Sherwood, E. T., Henkel, J. R., Dorans, K., Ireland, K., & Varela, P. (2019) · Estuaries and Coasts · doi:10.1007/s12237-019-00619-w · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Raposa, K. B., Lerberg, S. B., Cornu, C. E., et al. (2017) · Estuaries and Coasts · doi:10.1007/s12237-017-0220-7 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Application of the diminishing returns concept in the hydroecologic restoration of riverscapes
Diefenderfer, H. L., Johnson, G. E., Skalski, J. R., Breithaupt, S. A., & Coleman, A. M. (2012) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-012-9713-8 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Self-citationSynchrony of Piping Plover breeding populations in the U.S. Northern Great Plains
Roche, E. A., Shaffer, T. L., Dovichin, C. M., Sherfy, M. H., Anteau, M. J., & Wiltermuth, M. T. (2016) · The Condor · doi:10.1650/condor-15-195.1 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Valoppi, L. (2018) · Open-File Report · doi:10.3133/ofr20181039 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Development of a Multimetric Index for Integrated Assessment of Salt Marsh Ecosystem Condition
Nagel, J. L., Neckles, H. A., Guntenspergen, G. R., et al. (2017) · Estuaries and Coasts · doi:10.1007/s12237-017-0293-3 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citation(2014) · OpenEdition (OpenEdition) · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Seagrass Recovery in Tampa Bay, Florida (USA)
Greening, H., Janicki, A., & Sherwood, E. T. (2016) · The Wetland Book · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6173-5_269-1 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Incorporating positive interactions in aquatic restoration and conservation
Halpern, B. S., Silliman, B. R., Olden, J. D., et al. (2007) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18177719
Tidal Marsh Restoration: A Synthesis of Science and Management
Roman, C. T., & Burdick, D. M. (2013) · Native Plants Journal · doi:10.3368/npj.14.2.118
Self-citationChanges in the functioning of wetlands along environmental gradients
Brinson, M. M. (1993) · Wetlands · doi:10.1007/bf03160866
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- CEQ (Council on Environmental Quality), 1997, Considering cumulative effects under the National Environmental Policy Act
- Luoma SN, 2001, Ecological variability: separating natural from anthropogenic causes of ecosystem impairment
Cited by
Still being checked.
- Authors
- Diefenderfer, H. L., Steyer, G. D., Harwell, M. C., LoSchiavo, A. J., Neckles, H. A., Burdick, D. M., Johnson, G. E., Buenau, K. E., Trujillo, E., Callaway, J. C., Thom, R. M., Ganju, N. K., & Twilley, R. R.
- Affiliations
- Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (US)
- United States Geological Survey (US)
- Environmental Protection Agency (US)
- United States Army Corps of Engineers (US)
- University of New Hampshire (US)
- Puget Sound Partnership (US)
- University of San Francisco (US)
- Louisiana State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Diefenderfer, Heida L
- ORCID
- Venue
- Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-10-29
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 108-117
- ISSN
- 1540-9295 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-9309
- PMC
- PMC8597595
- OpenAlex
- W3094710550
- Semantic Scholar
- 8d500f99254edfc5e25fdeeda91b9aeec4540a30
- Cited by
- 55
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7
- FWCI
- 3.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
- University of New Hampshire Scholars Repository (University of New Hampshire at Manchester) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- NOAA Institutional Repository (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Ecology and biodiversity studies
- Keywords
- cumulative effects, restoration effectiveness, restoration design, long-term restoration outcomes, coastal restoration, Everglades, Gulf Coast, Columbia River, Puget Sound, San Francisco Bay, Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, Missouri River, positive feedback
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-27.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-27.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review