The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Perennial-streamflow characteristics related to channel geometry and sediment in Missouri River basin
Open accessAbstract
Geometry, channel-sediment, and discharge data were collected and compiled from 252 streamflow-gaging stations in the Missouri River basin.The stations, with several exceptions, have at least 20 years of streamflow records and represent the complete ranges of hydrologic and geologic conditions found in the basin.The data were analyzed by computer to yield simple and multiple power-function equations relating various discharge characteristics to variables of channel geometry and bed and bank material.The equations provide discharge as the dependent variable for the purpose of making estimates of discharge characteristics at ungaged sites.Results show that channel width is best related to variables of discharge, but that significant improvement, or reduction of the standard errors of estimate, can be achieved by considering channel-sediment properties, channel gradient, and discharge variability.The channel-material variables do not have uniform effects on width-discharge relations and, therefore, are considered as sediment-data groups, or stream types, rather than as terms in multiple power-function equations.Relative to streamflow, narrowest channels occur when streams of steady discharge transport sufficient silt and clay to form stable, cohesive banks but have a small bed-material load of sand and coarser sizes.Stable channels also are associated with relatively large channel gradients, relatively large channel roughness, and armoring of bed and bank by coarse particle sizes.The widest, most unstable channels are ones that apparently transport a large bedmaterial load of sand sizes.The downstream rates of change of width with discharge reflect these trends, indicating that a given bed-material load necessitates a minimum width for movement of tractive material.Comparisons of standard errors of estimate given here with similar results from regional studies are variable.It is assumed, however, that a benefit of this study is that the use of the equations is not limited to the Missouri River basin.Besides the principal utility of estimating discharge characteristics of ungaged streams, the equations given here can be used for the design of artificial channels and can be used as a basis of predicting channel changes resulting from upstream alterations of the basin or channel.Apple Creek near Menoken, N. Dak.........
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Corenblit, D., Tabacchi, E., Steiger, J., & Gurnell, A. M. (2007) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2007.05.004 · Cited by 721
Woodland Expansions in the Platte River, Nebraska: Patterns and Causes
Johnson, W. C. (1994) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/2937055 · Cited by 549
Irwin, R. P., Howard, A. D., Craddock, R. A., & Moore, J. M. (2005) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets · doi:10.1029/2005je002460 · Cited by 413
Formation timescales of large Martian valley networks
Hoke, M. R. T., Hynek, B. M., & Tucker, G. E. (2011) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2011.09.053 · Cited by 158
Metadata
- Authors
- Osterkamp, W. R., & Hedman, E. R.
- Venue
- Professional Paper
- Publisher
- US Geological Survey
- Published
- 1982
- ISSN
- 1044-9612 (ISSN-L)
- 2330-7102
- OpenAlex
- W1607049915
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 0
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Perennial-streamflow characteristics related to channel geometry and sediment in Missouri River basin. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3133/pp1242
- The paper
- Osterkamp, W. R., & Hedman, E. R. (1982). Perennial-streamflow characteristics related to channel geometry and sediment in Missouri River basin. Professional Paper. https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1242
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.