Cited by 158Planetary Science and ExplorationAstro and Planetary ScienceGeological formations and processes

Formation timescales of large Martian valley networks

Hoke, Monica R.T., Hynek, Brian M., Tucker, Gregory E.·2011·Earth and Planetary Science Letters

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.epsl.2011.09.053

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Landform evolution models suggest minimum formation timescales for the Martian valley networks of 10^5 to 10^7 years under climate conditions appropriate to arid regions on Earth.

    “Landform evolution models suggest minimum formation timescales for the valley networks of 10 5 to 10 7 years under climate conditions appropriate to arid regions on Earth (Barnhart, Howard & Moore 2009; Hoke, Hynek & Tucker 2011).”

    From The Climate of Early Mars (2016) · cites this paper as Hoke, Hynek & Tucker 2011

  • The largest Martian valley networks extend thousands of kilometers over the surface.

    “The largest networks are huge, extending thousands of kilometers over the surface in some cases (Howard, Moore & Irwin 2005; Hoke, Hynek & Tucker 2011).”

    From The Climate of Early Mars (2016) · cites this paper as Hoke, Hynek & Tucker 2011

  • There is a large discrepancy between the estimated valley network erosion rates and the amount of rainfall produced post-impact.

    “First, for transient impact-driven warming, there appears to be a large discrepancy between the estimated valley network erosion rates (Barnhart, Howard & Moore 2009; Hoke, Hynek & Tucker 2011) and the amount of rainfall produced post-impact (Toon, Segura & Zahnle 2010).”

    From The Climate of Early Mars (2016) · cites this paper as Hoke, Hynek & Tucker 2011

  • A successful theory for surface warming must yield valley network erosion rates consistent with the geologic evidence but avoid extensive surface carbonate formation and aqueous alteration of sediments.

    “A successful theory for surface warming must yield valley network erosion rates consistent with the geologic evidence (Hoke, Hynek & Tucker 2011) but avoid extensive surface carbonate formation and aqueous alteration of sediments (Tosca & Knoll 2009; Ehlmann et al. 2011).”

    From The Climate of Early Mars (2016) · cites this paper as Hoke, Hynek & Tucker 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 79 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoke, M. R. T., Hynek, B. M., & Tucker, G. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
  • Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (US)
Corresponding author
Hoke, Monica R.T.
Venue
Earth and Planetary Science Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-12
Volume
312
Issue
1-2
Pages
1-12
ISSN
0012-821X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2036026278
Cited by
158
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Earth and Planetary Science Letters (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NNX06AE08G)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Earth-Surface Processes › Geological formations and processes
Keywords
Martian valley networks, sediment transport, Darcy-Weisbach equation, flow velocity, valley incision

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review