The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Botanical evidence of floods and flood-plain deposition
Open accessAbstract
Hydrologic concepts___________________________ Collection of streamflow records._____________Comparison of floods._______________________Floodstage-discharge realtionship_____________ Effects of floods upon trees.._________________________ Physical effects of high velocity and debris _________ Effects of inundation upon trees._________________Growth of trees after flood damage_______-____________ Circumferential growth around trunk scars.________Growth of sprouts from stumps and water-felled trees-Growth of trees following burial by alluvium during floods _______________________________________ Analysis of structure of wood from buried trunk_ Page v Al 1 2 2 4 4 4 5
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Ecology of Interfaces: Riparian Zones
Naiman, R. J., & Décamps, H. (1997) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.621 · Cited by 2,791
Effects of large organic material on channel form and fluvial processes
Keller, E. A., & Swanson, F. J. (1979) · Earth Surface Processes · doi:10.1002/esp.3290040406 · Cited by 819
Nanson, G. C., & Beach, H. F. (1977) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.2307/3038059 · Cited by 284
Metadata
- Authors
- Sigafoos, R. S.
- Venue
- Professional Paper
- Publisher
- US Geological Survey
- Published
- 1964
- ISSN
- 1044-9612 (ISSN-L)
- 2330-7102
- OpenAlex
- W100421263
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 0
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Botanical evidence of floods and flood-plain deposition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3133/pp485a
- The paper
- Sigafoos, R. S. (1964). Botanical evidence of floods and flood-plain deposition. Professional Paper. https://doi.org/10.3133/pp485a
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
