The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hydrologic unit maps
Open accessAbstract
A set of maps depicting approved boundaries of, and numerical codes for, river-basin units of the United States has been developed by the U.S . Geological Survey. These 'Hydrologic Unit Maps' are four-color maps that present information on drainage, culture, hydrography, and hydrologic boundaries and codes of (1) the 21 major water-resources regions and the 222 subregions designated by the U.S . Water Resources Council, (2) the 352 accounting units of the U.S. Geological Survey's National Water Data Network, and (3) the 2,149 cataloging units of the U.S . Geological Survey's 'Catalog of information on Water Data:' The maps are plotted on the Geological Survey State base-map series at a scale of 1 :500,000 and, except for Alaska, depict hydrologic unit boundaries for all drainage basins greater than 700 square miles (1,813 square kilometers). A complete list of all the hydrologic units, along with their drainage areas, their names, and the names of the States or outlying areas in which they reside, is contained in the report. These maps and associated codes provide a standardized base for use by water-resources organizations in locating, storing, retrieving, and exchanging hydrologic data, in indexing and inventorying hydrologic data and information, in cataloging water-data acquisition activities, and in a variety of other applications. Because the maps have undergone extensive review by all principal Federal, regional, and State water-resource agencies, they are widely accepted for use in planning and describing water-use and related land-use activities, and in geographically organizing hydrologic data . Examples of these uses are given in the report . The hydrologic unit codes shown on the maps have been approved as a Federal Information Processing Standard for use by the Federal establishment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data
Anderson, J. R., Hardy, E. E., Roach, J. T., & Witmer, R. E. (1976) · Professional Paper · doi:10.3133/pp964 · Cited by 4,827
Cited by
A Project for Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity
Eidenshink, J., Schwind, B., Brewer, K., Zhu, Z.-L., Quayle, B., & Howard, S. (2007) · Fire Ecology · doi:10.4996/fireecology.0301003 · Cited by 1,423
Velpuri, N. M., Senay, G. B., Singh, R. K., Bohms, S., & Verdin, J. P. (2013) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2013.07.013 · Cited by 425
LANDSCAPE DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY INDEX
BROWN, M. T., & VIVAS, M. B. (2005) · Environmental Monitoring and Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10661-005-0296-6 · Cited by 344
Denitrification in the Mississippi River network controlled by flow through river bedforms
Gomez-Velez, J. D., Harvey, J. W., Cardenas, M. B., & Kiel, B. (2015) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/ngeo2567 · Cited by 331
Di Luzio, M., Johnson, G. L., Daly, C., Eischeid, J. K., & Arnold, J. G. (2008) · Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology · doi:10.1175/2007jamc1356.1 · Cited by 271
Metadata
- Publisher
- US Geological Survey
- Published
- 1987
- OpenAlex
- W1543611309
- Cited by
- 377
- References
- 1
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hydrologic unit maps. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3133/wsp2294
- The paper
- Hydrologic unit maps. (1987). https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp2294
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.