The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Guide for selecting Manning's roughness coefficients for natural channels and flood plains
Open accessAbstract
Introduction 1 Methods 2 Channel n Values 2 Base n Values (nb) for Channels 2 Adjustment Factors for Channel n Values 6 Irregularity (HJ) 6 Variation in Channel Cross Section («2) 6 Obstructions (n3) 6 Vegetation («4) 6 Meandering (m) 8 Rood-Plain n Values 8 Modified Channel Method 8 Adjustment Factors for Flood-Plain n Values 8 Surface Irregularities (HJ) 8 Obstructions («3) 8 Vegetation (n4) 8 Vegetation-Density Method 9 Techniques for Determining Vegetation Density 9 Indirect Technique 10 Direct Technique 10 Photographs of Flood Plains 13 Procedures for Assigning n Values 28 Steps for Assigning n Values 28 Reach Subdivision (Steps 1 and 2) 28 Channel Roughness (Steps 3-13) 28 Rood-Plain Roughness (Steps 14-23) 29 Examples of Procedures for Determining n Values 32 Summary 32 References Cited 37FIGURES 1. Diagram of a schematic and cross sections of a hypothetical reach of a channel and flood plain showing subdivisions used in assigning n values 3 2. Graph showing relation of stream power and median grain size to flow regime 5 3. Diagram showing forms of bed roughness in sand-bed channels 5 4. Graph showing effective-drag coefficient for verified n values versus the hydraulic radius of wide, wooded flood plains 10 5. Chart of example measurement of vegetation density showing tree diameter and location in representative sample area 12
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2006) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-7506-6857-6.x5000-0 · Cited by 4,961
Yager, W. C. (1960) · Journal of the Franklin Institute · doi:10.1016/0016-0032(60)90908-x · Cited by 4,803
Henderson, F. M. (1966) · Macmillan eBooks · Cited by 2,194
Analysis of Flow through Vegetation
Petryk, S., & Bosmajian, G. (1975) · Journal of the Hydraulics Division · doi:10.1061/jyceaj.0004397 · Cited by 402
Cited by
Corenblit, D., Tabacchi, E., Steiger, J., & Gurnell, A. M. (2007) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2007.05.004 · Cited by 721
Simple spatially-distributed models for predicting flood inundation: A review
Hunter, N. M., Bates, P. D., Horritt, M. S., & Wilson, M. D. (2007) · Geomorphology · doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.10.021 · Cited by 440
Melosh, H. J. (2011) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511977848 · Cited by 311
Lim, H. S., Fraser, A., & Knights, A. M. (2020) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab83ae · Cited by 36
Quantifying and simulating stormwater runoff in watersheds
Blair, A., Sanger, D., White, D., Holland, A. F., Vandiver, L., Bowker, C., & White, S. (2014) · Hydrological Processes · doi:10.1002/hyp.9616 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Publisher
- US Geological Survey
- Published
- 1989
- OpenAlex
- W2081533047
- Cited by
- 1,373
- References
- 5
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Guide for selecting Manning's roughness coefficients for natural channels and flood plains. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3133/wsp2339
- The paper
- Guide for selecting Manning's roughness coefficients for natural channels and flood plains. (1989). https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp2339
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.