The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 48 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka
Open accessAbstract
Iskustvo Drugoga židovskoga ustanka protiv Rimljana znatno je utjecalo na susljedni razvoj židovske misli u pitanjima mesijanizma i eshatologije. Mesijanizam je u srednjostrujaškom židovstvu postao pasivan, što se odrazilo na političke ambicije obnove židovske državnosti, koje su nakon 135. skoro potpuno splasnule. Posljedice ustanka zbog židovskoga su shvaćanja povijesti kao relevantne za teološku epistemologiju dovele do vjerski utemeljenoga političkoga kvijetizma, zbog kojega je vjerski židovski stav prema cionizmu sve do nedavno odražavao izrazitu nesklonost. Do promjene u tom stavu počelo je dolaziti iz istoga razloga, a to je povijesno iskustvo osnutka i obrane Države Izrael.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The paper argues that the failure of the Bar Kokhba revolt (132–135 CE) transformed Jewish messianic thought from an active, political, state-building messianism into a passive, eschatological, quietist one that shaped rabbinic Judaism for nearly two millennia. It further argues that the same method of reading history theologically — which produced this quietism — later re-ignited an activist messianism after the establishment and defense of the State of Israel.
Key findings
- Before Bar Kokhba, messianism was "historical": the Messiah's mission was political, pragmatic, national and redemptive, with the Jewish people actively participating in political processes; after 135 it became "eschatological," tied to the end of history rather than to intervention within it (following Sanders, 2006, 235–236).
- The revolt's aftermath produced a faith-based political quietism: exile (*galut*) was read as divine punishment to be patiently borne, speculating about the Messiah's timing was forbidden (Kedourie, 1988, 288), and mass organized return to Zion was seen by most rabbis as defiance of God.
- Active messianism became "almost a form of heresy," which is given as a key reason religious Jewish attitudes toward political Zionism were strongly negative for decades; statehood was framed as a religious, not political, question.
- The same historical-theological method later reversed this: after 1948 and especially 1967, debate reopened over whether the messianic era had begun, with Heschel calling the State of Israel's creation "like the miracle of the parting of the Red Sea" (Heschel, 1987, 203–204), and a new Zionist messianism appearing in attitudes toward settling Judea and Samaria.
Methods
- Historical-theological essay / conceptual analysis, not an empirical study; no dataset or sample.
- Sources are secondary literature and primary religious texts: rabbinic literature (Mishna, Jerusalem and Babylonian Talmuds, e.g. BT Sanhedrin 98a–98b; JT Ta'anit 24a), Maimonides' thirteen principles, and modern scholarship (Klausner, Scholem, Schürer, Silver, Greenstone, Sanders, Gordon, Da-Don, Goldwater, and others).
- Main analytic move: comparing pre- and post-Bar Kokhba messianism, and tracing how historical experience was encoded into rabbinic texts and thereby into normative theology.
Limitations
- The paper states that the shift from "historical" to "eschatological" messianism is not attributed to the Bar Kokhba experience in Jewish religious texts themselves but is *read out of* them, so it would be hard to claim the revolt is a sharp dividing line; it is a transition between two general conceptions, and messianic thought was multilayered, complex, mobile and sometimes ambiguous both before and after.
- The author notes the revolt is linked to other historical processes predating it (Babylonian exile, life without political power in Judea, Hellenization, Hasmonean upheavals, the First Revolt, loss of the Temple, diaspora growth, the rise of Christianity), which complicates any single-cause account.
- Evident from the text (not stated as a limitation by the author): the argument rests on interpretive synthesis of secondary scholarship rather than new primary-source evidence, and the concluding claim linking this history to contemporary Israeli politics is asserted rather than demonstrated empirically.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
48 Own interpretation · 34 Sources not found · 20 No basis given · 9 No full text of the sources · 6 Not checked yet
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“a započinjanje masovnoga, organiziranoga židovskoga povratka na Cion kako bi se obnovila državnost veći dio rabina smatrao je odrazom samovolje i prkosa prema Bogu.”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Osim Jupiterova svetišta, na ruševinama židovskoga hrama Hadrijan je u Jeruzalemu izgradio još jedan poganski hram.”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > 1. Palestinska Aelia Capitolina na ruševinama judejskoga Jeruzalema
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Židovi su izgnanstvo iz Erec Izraela 2 s vremenom počeli shvaćati kao pokoru, 3 odnosno Božju kaznu koju valja strpljivo podnositi sve dok je Bog, svojom suverenom voljom, ne odluči privesti kraju.”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Na mjestu koje su kršćani štovali kao mjesto Golgote i Kristova groba podignuto je svetište posvećeno Afroditi (Skarsaune, 2002, 53) 6 ili Veneri (Avi-Yonah, 2006, 31).”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > 1. Palestinska Aelia Capitolina na ruševinama judejskoga Jeruzalema
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Skarsaune, 2002, 53
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Avi-Yonah, 2006, 31
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Prvi put nakon Antioha Epifana židovstvo kao vjera se progoni (Klausner, 1955, 399).”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > 1. Palestinska Aelia Capitolina na ruševinama judejskoga Jeruzalema
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Klausner, 1955, 399
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Iznimka su bili nežidovski kršćani, čiji udio u judejskoj Crkvi nije poznat, ali je sasvim izvjesno da su činili manjinu (Skarsaune, 2002, 181).”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > 1. Palestinska Aelia Capitolina na ruševinama judejskoga Jeruzalema
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Skarsaune, 2002, 181
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“pa je većina rabina cionizam tumačila sa stajališta tradicije, a ne pragmatičnosti.”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Goldwater, 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Obnova židovske državnosti s religijskoga je očišta poglavito vjersko, a ne političko pitanje.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Iskustvo Drugoga židovskoga ustanka protiv Rimljana znatno je utjecalo na susljedni razvoj židovske misli u pitanjima mesijanizma i eshatologije.”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > Abstract
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Mesijanska su očekivanja nakon Drugoga ustanka postala dijelom eshatoloških, a ne povijesnih nadanja Židova.”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“zbog kojih se Hadrijan surovo osvetio buntovnomu židovskomu stanovništvu.”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > 1. Palestinska Aelia Capitolina na ruševinama judejskoga Jeruzalema
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Rimljani su Bar Kohbin ustanak ugušili nakon tri godine teških borbi i gubitaka.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 35
- It may state two separate claims as one. 40
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Oblik rimskoga logora, podignuta u Jeruzalemu nakon što je grad pretvoren u Aeliju Capitolinu, uvelike odgovara današnjemu obliku jeruzalemskoga Staroga grada (Kroyanker, 2002, 14; Kenyon,”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > 1.1. Aelia kao rimski vojni logor
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Kroyanker, 2002, 14
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Kenyon
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Hadrijan je sve židovsko stanovništvo protjerao iz Jeruzalema, u grad naselio tuđince, a ime grada promijenio u Aelia Capitolina.”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > 1. Palestinska Aelia Capitolina na ruševinama judejskoga Jeruzalema
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Rimljani su Jeruzalem, sada Aeliju Capitolinu, sveli na vojni logor u koji se je smjestila rimska Deseta legija.”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > 1.1. Aelia kao rimski vojni logor
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Jeruzalem je preimenovao po sebi, jer je njegovo puno ime bilo Publius Aelius Hadrianus, te po vrhovnom božanstvu rimskoga panteona Jupiteru Capitolinusu.”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > 1. Palestinska Aelia Capitolina na ruševinama judejskoga Jeruzalema
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Židovi se u Jeruzalem, uz nekoliko kratkotrajnih iznimki, nisu smjeli vratiti punih pola tisućljeća, sve do muslimanskoga osvajanja grada 638.godine.”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > 1. Palestinska Aelia Capitolina na ruševinama judejskoga Jeruzalema
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Znatan dio Židova obnovu je židovske državnosti još od vremena Drugoga hrama vidio kao djelo otkupljenja usko povezano s ostvarenjem mesijanskih obećanja.”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > Abstract
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Eshel opaža da »premda su se takve promjene imena događale i drugdje, nikada prije ni kasnije ime jednoga naroda nije izbrisano kao posljedica pobune« (Eshel, 2006, 127).”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > 1.3. Podrijetlo i uporaba imena Palestina
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Eshel, 2006, 127
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Židovstvo postaje usredotočeno na proučavanje i tumačenje vjerskih tekstova, a političke ideje koje bi uključivale borbenost iz njega se potiskuju.”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > 2. Razvoj poslijeustaničkoga rabinskoga židovstva
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“To je proces »prekršaja, pokajanja i obnove« (Kedourie, 1988, 289) koji Židovi ne mogu samovoljno prekinuti, primjerice povratkom u Erec Izrael, nego moraju čekati da se Bog, nakon što se ispuni vrijeme pokore, smiluje i vrati ih iz progonstva kao što ih je nekoć vratio iz Babilona.”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Kedourie, 1988, 289 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Središte židovskoga vjerskoga, kulturnoga, obrazovnoga i nacionalnoga života nakon 135.postao je galut, u kojem je stoljećima živjela golema većina Žido-”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > 2. Razvoj poslijeustaničkoga rabinskoga židovstva
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [12]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Kasnije reakcije na Bar Kohbino proglašavanje mesijom, koje se poglavito povezuje s rabinom Akivom, kreću se od neodobravanja, koje nalazimo već u Jeruzalemskom Talmudu (JT Ta'anit 24a), do čuđenja, uz napomenu kako je između 70.i 135.»politički čimbenik prevladavao u mesijanskoj ideji« (Klausner, 1955, 394-396).”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > 2. Razvoj poslijeustaničkoga rabinskoga židovstva
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites JT Ta'anit 24a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Klausner, 1955, 394-396
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Praktična religija i praktična politika u židovstvu su se odvojile i za mnoga stoljeća ostat će odvojene.”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > 2. Razvoj poslijeustaničkoga rabinskoga židovstva
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Pitanje obnove Izraelove kraljevine postaje stvar Božje suverene intervencije, a povezivanje političkoga aktivizma s njom gotovo je svedeno na herezu.”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > 2. Razvoj poslijeustaničkoga rabinskoga židovstva
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Schürer ukazuje na to da je poraz Bar Kohbina pokreta donio i poraz helenizma među Židovima.”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > 2. Razvoj poslijeustaničkoga rabinskoga židovstva
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Schürer
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Da je Bar Kohbin ustanak prouzročio veće zlo nego i jedan drugi prethodni čin pobune vidljivo je iz kasnijih negativnih opisa Bar Kohbe u rabinskoj literaturi, premda u njima postoji i određena ambivalentnost.13”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > 2. Razvoj poslijeustaničkoga rabinskoga židovstva
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [13]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Ostali su nastavili prianjati uza stare tradicije pridajući im tumačenja u skladu s novonastalim okolnostima.”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > 2. Razvoj poslijeustaničkoga rabinskoga židovstva
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On ne čeka da mu izbavljenje”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > 3. Preobrazba mesijansko-političke misli 3.1. Historična mesijanska misao
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Židovi su u to vrijeme mesijin dolazak smatrali Božjom intervencijom u svojoj povijesti, bez osobita utjecaja na ostatak svijeta -s iznimkom Rimljana koji će biti kažnjeni -i bez eshatoloških implikacija.”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > 3. Preobrazba mesijansko-političke misli 3.1. Historična mesijanska misao
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“»Bog Izraelov Bog je povijesti; značenje i očitovanje Boga treba više tražiti u povijesnim zbivanjima i društvenim procesima nego u području prirode« (Spero, 1989, 41).”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > 3. Preobrazba mesijansko-političke misli 3.1. Historična mesijanska misao
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Spero, 1989, 41
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Židovski helenizam, što je navješćivao bratstvo svih ljudi, nestao je, a farizejsko židovstvo, što je oštro odbacivalo svako zajedništvo s poganskim svijetom, steklo je opću prihvaćenost”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > 2. Razvoj poslijeustaničkoga rabinskoga židovstva
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Schürer, 2009, 319
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Bez razumijevanja povezanosti povijesnoga iskustva i preobrazbe mesijansko-političke misli teško je razumjeti suvremene političke procese u Izraelu”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > Zaključak
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“A tu leži Mesijina najvažnija zadaća: on će svekoliki židovski narod sa svih krajeva svijeta sabrati u Erec Izrael, izgradit će Treći hram, bit će vrhovni sudac svijeta te učitelj svim narodima o Bogu i Tori.”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > 3.2. Eshatološka mesijanska misao
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Da-Don, 2004
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“I Rambamov je mesijanizam više”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > 3.2. Eshatološka mesijanska misao
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Neki su prihvatili kršćanstvo, a njihov se je židovski identitet nakon nekoliko naraštaja ugasio.”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > 2. Razvoj poslijeustaničkoga rabinskoga židovstva
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Mesijanska je misao i prije i poslije bila višeslojna, složena, pokretna i evolutivna, pokatkad ambigvitetna.”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > 3.2. Eshatološka mesijanska misao
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“ali mesije se u stvarnom životu više ne pojavljuju, osobito ne kao karizmatični predvodnici znatnijega broja oduševljenih sljedbenika.”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > 3.2. Eshatološka mesijanska misao
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Rabin Haim David Halevi, na temelju takva shvaćanja povijesti, odredio je da je za Židova proučavanje povijesti micva (Katz, 2005, 280).”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > 3. Preobrazba mesijansko-političke misli 3.1. Historična mesijanska misao
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Katz, 2005, 280
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Mesijanizam nakon Bar Kohbe postao je eshatološki, apolitičan, pasivan i, skoro se može reći, prožet -Židovima inače nesvojstvenim -fatalizmom.”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > Zaključak
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Sva ta vjerovanja utemeljena su u Bibliji”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > 3.2. Eshatološka mesijanska misao
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Da-Don, 2004
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Rabinsko židovstvo, Sanders objašnjava, oblikuje se u zajednici u kojoj Tora zacrtava misao i život.”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > 3.2. Eshatološka mesijanska misao
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“S Mesijinim dolaskom nastupit će vrijeme blagodati za židovski narod, nežidovski će ih narodi prestati progoniti jer će se pokajati i shvatiti da je Izraelov Bog jedini pravi Bog.”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > 3.2. Eshatološka mesijanska misao
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Da-Don, 2004
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Prema njoj »odlučna nacionalna volja ne će proizvesti nacionalnu neovisnost.Naprotiv, izvanredna natprirodna kataklizma nametnut će božansku vlast beznadnim zemaljskim okolnostima« (Gordon, 1989, 83).”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > 3.2. Eshatološka mesijanska misao
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Gordon, 1989, 83
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Slično kao Sanders, Gordon primjećuje da se tek nakon strašnoga poraza Bar Kohbina ustanka apokaliptična očekivanja utemeljena u očaju počinju u znatnoj mjeri pojavljivati u srednjostrujaškim tanaitičkim, a potom i amoraičkim izvorima.”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > 3.2. Eshatološka mesijanska misao
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To je metoda tumačenja Božje volje kroz prizmu povijesnih zbivanja.”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > 4. Država Izrael i reevaluacija mesijanizma
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“»Prema židovstvu, eshatološko će doba, mesijanski dani, nastupiti Božjom odlukom i određenjem, oviseći samo o njemu« (Da-Don, 2004, 664-669).”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > 3.2. Eshatološka mesijanska misao
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Da-Don, 2004, 664-669
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“On govori o jednom mesijanskom konceptu u kojem je naglasak na”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > 3.2. Eshatološka mesijanska misao
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“ka ustupio mjesto drukčijemu, bitno opreznijemu viđenju Mesije i mesijanskoga doba.Ono se od tada sve manje povezuje s poviješću, a sve više s njezinim krajem.”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > 3. Preobrazba mesijansko-političke misli 3.1. Historična mesijanska misao
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Povijest u židovstvu nije, niti je ikada bila, slijed zbivanja odvojenih od duhovne stvarnosti, nego ona ima epistemološku vrijednost za teologiju.”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > 3. Preobrazba mesijansko-političke misli 3.1. Historična mesijanska misao
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Spero, 1989, 41
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Čežnja Židova za dolaskom mesijanskoga doba, otkupljenjem i obnovom Izraelove kraljevine nije nestala, ali se je njezino ispunjenje tijekom skoro dva tisućljeća nije tražilo kroz državotvorne pokrete, pobune, politički i društveni aktivizam, ni traženje mesijanskih ličnosti, nego kroz obdržavanje Zakona, molitvu, proučavanje Tore i čekanje da Bog privede kraju galut, a Izrael duhovno izbavi i”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > Zaključak
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Važan je razlog bio taj što je mnoge među poganima koji su tražili Boga Izraelova privuklo kršćanstvo, a ono je, za razliku od židovstva, prozelitirajuća vjera.”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > 2. Razvoj poslijeustaničkoga rabinskoga židovstva
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Uz rabinske spise, Židovi su koristili i Bibliju, što se do 19.stoljeća poglavito odnosilo na Toru (Shavit i Eran, 2007, 5).”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > 2. Razvoj poslijeustaničkoga rabinskoga židovstva
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Shavit i Eran, 2007, 5
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Žar i čežnja s kojima su Židovi tijekom razdoblja Drugoga hrama očekivali da se Mesija pojavi među njima, kao jedan od njih, odražavali su duh toga vremena i židovstva u obliku u kojem se do tad razvilo.”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > 3. Preobrazba mesijansko-političke misli 3.1. Historična mesijanska misao
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The attitude of religious Jews to political Zionism, when it first appeared, was very averse and remained such until rather recently.”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > Additional information
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Znatan dio raspršenih Židova u dijaspori s vremenom se je asimilirao.”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > 2. Razvoj poslijeustaničkoga rabinskoga židovstva
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Židovi trebaju biti vjerni Tori sve dok Bog ne pošalje Mesiju u njegovo vrijeme »kao kraj povijesti i početak budućega svijeta, a ne kao intervenciju ili objavu u povijesti što je u tijeku« (Sanders, 2006, 236).”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > 3.2. Eshatološka mesijanska misao
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Sanders, 2006, 236 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Tijekom srednjega vijeka, normativno viđenje Mesije u srednjostrujaškom židovstvu postalo je ono koje je postavio Rambam u svojih trinaest načela židovske vjere.”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > 3.2. Eshatološka mesijanska misao
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Mesijanizam prije Bar Kohbe velikim je dijelom bio aktivan, angažiran, strastven, državotvoran i politički, a nacionalna židovska uključenost u povijesna previranja doživljavala se je kao relevantna za ostvarenje mesijanskih očekivanja.”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > Zaključak
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“U tom viđenju mesijanskoga doba nema osobitih kataklizmičkih događaja, nego se Rambam poziva na riječi jednoga od talmudskih učenjaka: »Nema druge razlike između ovoga svijeta i mesijanskih dana, osim u robovanju kraljevstvima.«”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > 3.2. Eshatološka mesijanska misao
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Da-Don, 2004
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“U vrijeme procvata helenističkoga židovstva međa između židovskoga i grčko-rimskoga svjetonazora prijetila je iščeznućem, no Židovi i njihovi protivnici sada su zajedničkim snagama usmjerili pozornost na širenje toga jaza.”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > 2. Razvoj poslijeustaničkoga rabinskoga židovstva
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Schürer, 2009, 319
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“a Da-Don objašnjava kako je mesijansko doba dio eshatološkoga, podijeljena u tri dijela: prvi su dani Mesije, drugi uskrsnuće mrtvih, a treći dolazak budućega svijeta.”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > 3.2. Eshatološka mesijanska misao
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Da-Don, 2004
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Drugi mesijanizam predstavlja”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > 3.2. Eshatološka mesijanska misao
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“U židovskom vjerskom stavu prema naseljavanju Judeje i Samarije, koje je Izrael zauzeo 1967., razabire se jedan novi, cionistički mesijanizam, koji kao da zatvara dvotisućljetni krug i mesijanstvo vraća na oblike kakvi su postojali prije Bar Kohbe.”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > 4. Država Izrael i reevaluacija mesijanizma
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“U njemu se razvija nepovjerljivost prema karizmatičnom proroštvu i nespremnost da se zbivanja tumače kao božanske pozive na akciju.”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > 3.2. Eshatološka mesijanska misao
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“ali će istodobno donijeti neviđene nevolje, nemire, uskrsnuće mrtvih i konačni sud (Goldenberg, 2006, 202)”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > 3.2. Eshatološka mesijanska misao
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Goldenberg, 2006, 202
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Dolazak Mesije predstavlja dvanaesto teološko načelo”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > 3.2. Eshatološka mesijanska misao
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Židovstvo, pokazala je uspostava i obrana Države Izraela, nikad nije prestalo biti osjetljivo na teološke poruke povijesti, niti je prestalo biti spremno odazvati im se.”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > Zaključak
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“U takvom mesijanizmu, koje se može nazvati historičnim, Mesijina je misija politička, pragmatična, nacionalna i izbaviteljska.”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > 3. Preobrazba mesijansko-političke misli 3.1. Historična mesijanska misao
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Do konca 3. stoljeća završena je kompilacija Mišne i Jeruzalemskoga Talmuda, a do konca 5. stoljeća Babilonskoga Talmuda.”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > 2. Razvoj poslijeustaničkoga rabinskoga židovstva
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [18]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Tumačenje razlike mesijanstva prije i mesijanstva poslije Bar Kohbina ustanka predstavio je James A. Sanders, koji objašnjava da je rabin Akiva vjerovao kako je Bar Kohba mesija, zbog kojega će Bog ustati protiv Rimljana i preko njega izbaviti svoj narod (Sanders, 2006, 235).”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > 3. Preobrazba mesijansko-političke misli 3.1. Historična mesijanska misao
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Sanders, 2006, 235 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To je iskustvo pretočeno u tekstove rabinske književnosti, čime je stavljeno u teorijski okvir, ali to ne umanjuje činjenicu da je nastao iz povijesti, a ne iz teorije -iz iskustva, a ne iz objave.”
§ Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka > Zaključak
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Židovsko shvaćanje povijesti relevantno je za teološku epistemologiju.
“Posljedice ustanka zbog židovskoga su shvaćanja povijesti kao relevantne za teološku epistemologiju dovele do vjerski utemeljenoga političkoga kvijetizma”
The paper relies on this without support.
Nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka Židovi su ostali bez političke vlasti i bez domovine.
“Nakon ustanka, Židovi ne samo da su ostali bez političke vlasti, nego i bez domovine.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Veliko izgnanstvo nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka potrajalo je skoro dva tisućljeća.
“Počeo je galut ,)גלות( veliko izgnanstvo koje je potrajalo skoro dva tisućljeća.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Obnova židovske državnosti s religijskoga je očišta poglavito vjersko, a ne političko pitanje.
“Obnova židovske državnosti s religijskoga je očišta, naime, poglavito vjersko, a ne političko pitanje”
The paper relies on this without support.
Rimljani su Bar Kohbin ustanak ugušili nakon tri godine teških borbi i gubitaka.
“Rimljani su Bar Kohbin ustanak ugušili nakon tri godine teških borbi i gubitaka”
The paper relies on this without support.
Preživjeli Židovi bili su raspršeni po svijetu i više nisu smjeli prići svojemu svetomu gradu.
“Preživjeli su Židovi raspršeni po svijetu, a svojemu svetomu gradu više nisu smjeli prići.”
Citations
Cites
The Biblical Canon: Its Origin, Transmission, and Authority
Spronk, K. (2008) · Journal for the Study of Judaism · doi:10.1163/157006308x375933 · Cited by 98
Excavations in Jerusalem, 1962
Kenyon, K. M. (1963) · Palestine Exploration Quarterly · doi:10.1179/peq.1963.95.1.7 · Cited by 93
The Impact of the Holocaust on Jewish theology
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-2144 · Cited by 51
The Biblical Canon: Its Origin, Transmission, and Authority
McDonald, L. M. (2006) · Cited by 47
Heschel, A. J. (1969) · Cited by 27
The Messianic Idea and Zionist Ideologies
Myers, J. E. (1991) · Jews And Messianism In The Modern Era: Metaphor And Meaning · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195066906.003.0001 · Cited by 15
(1906) · Digital collections (Goethe University Frankfurt) · Cited by 13
Palestine: On the History and Geography of a Name
Lewis, B. (1980) · The International History Review · doi:10.1080/07075332.1980.9640202 · Cited by 13 · cited 1×
“Judeja je, izgledno, preimenovana u Palestinu u isto vrijeme kad i Jeruzalem u Aeliju Capitolinu, »radi zatiranja njezina povijesnoga židovskoga identiteta« (Lewis, 1980, 2).”
BackgroundToker, F. K. B., & Kroyanker, D. (1995) · Zeitschrift für Kunstgeschichte · doi:10.2307/1482822 · Cited by 12
The Jewish Messiahs: From the Galilee to Crown Heights
Frey, J.-B. (1998) · Cited by 11
Early Christianity and Its Sacred Literature
Houlden, L. (2001) · Theology · doi:10.1177/0040571x0110400617 · Cited by 7
Sanders, J. A. (2006) · The Cambridge History of Judaism · doi:10.1017/chol9780521772488.011 · Cited by 4
Arapsko-Izraelski sukob: religija politika i povijest Svete zemlje
Havel, B. (2013) · Cited by 4
Self-citationBar Kohba i Drugi židovski ustanak Povijesni izvori
Havel, B. (2019) · Obnovljeni život : časopis za filozofiju i religijske znanosti · doi:10.31337/oz.74.4.3 · Cited by 3
Self-citationJudaism and Zionism in the Holy Land
Kedourie, E. (1988) · The Holy Land in History and Thought · doi:10.1163/9789004676763_025 · Cited by 2
The Jewish messiahs from the Galilee to Crown Heights
Lenowitz, H. (1998) · Cited by 2
(2005) · Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) · Cited by 1
Jerusalem in Early Islamic Tradition
Havel, B. (2021) · JDB - Jevrejska digitalna biblioteka · Cited by 1
Self-citationJerusalem in Early Islamic Tradition
Havel, B. (2019) · doi:10.15291/misc.2748 · Cited by 1
Self-citationExcavations in Jerusalem 1961-1963
Kenyon, K. M. (1964) · The Biblical Archaeologist · doi:10.2307/3210971
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Komparativne studije Bliskoga istoka u Hrvatskoj
Zgurić, B. (2020) · Anali Hrvatskog politološkog društva · doi:10.20901/an.17.08
Život Josipa Flavija i pitanje pouzdanosti njegovih djela
Havel, B. (2023) · Kairos · doi:10.32862/k1.17.2.1
Self-citationLife and Reliability of Josephus
Havel, B. (2023) · Kairos · doi:10.32862/k.17.2.1
Self-citationCatholic Church, Jews, the Shoah and the State of Israel
Havel, B. (2023) · Nordisk Judaistik/Scandinavian Jewish Studies · doi:10.30752/nj.126185
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Havel, B.
- Affiliations
- University of Zagreb (HR)
- Corresponding author
- Havel, Boris
- ORCID
- Havel, Boris
- Venue
- Obnovljeni život
- Published
- 2020-06-11
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 215-227
- ISSN
- 0351-3947 (ISSN-L)
- 1849-0182
- OpenAlex
- W3021033057
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2023: 3 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 8.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- hr
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Obnovljeni život : časopis za filozofiju i religijske znanosti (publishedVersion)
- University of Zagreb University Computing Centre (SRCE) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Religion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Theology and Sovereignty
- Keywords
- Bar Kokhba revolt, Jewish messianism, eschatology, Jewish political thought, Jewish statehood, Zionism, Jewish historiography, epistemology of religion, Jewish theology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-29, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-29 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
