Cited by 36Food composition and propertiesPolysaccharides Composition and ApplicationsProteins in Food Systems

Effect of Guar Gum, Xanthan Gum, CMC and HPMC on Dough Rhealogy and Physical Properties of Barbari Bread

Open access
MALEKI, Gisoo, MILANI, Jafar M.·2013·Food Science and Technology Research

Abstract

The effects of four hydrocolloids (guar, xanthan gum, carboxylmethylcellulose (CMC), and hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC)) in three concentrations (0.1, 0.5, and 1 % w/w flour basis), on Barbari (Iranian bread) was investigated. Farinograph parameters, physical properties (specific volume, oven spring, height to width ratio, crumb to crust ratio), and the moisture content of fresh bread were analyzed. CMC and HPMC had the most noticeable effect on dough rheological properties; leading to a more strengthened dough. The hydrocolloids also improved the bread’s physical properties. In addition, the best effect on moisture content was observed by 0.5% CMC, followed by 0.5% and 1% HPMC. Hydrocolloids did not unfavourably influence the sensory properties of bread. All sensory parameters were improved using hydrocolloids. Consequently, despite the improving effect of all hydrocolloids, cellulose derivatives could have better uses in bread-making processes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3136/fstr.19.353

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hydrocolloid competition with gluten proteins for water is an important element that influences gluten development.

    “The hydrocolloids competition with gluten proteins for water is an important element that influences the gluten development.”

    From Improving the quality of dough obtained with old durum wheat using hydrocolloids (2020) · cites this paper as Maleki & Milani, 2013

    The Results and Discussion section (page unavailable) reports that hydrocolloids increased water absorption and slightly increased dough-development time. It does not say that hydrocolloids compete with gluten proteins for water or establish that competition as the reason gluten development changes. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Kaur, K. and Singh, N. (1999). Effect of acetic acid and CMC on rheological and baking properties of flour. J. Food Quality., 22(3), 317-323.
  2. Phimolsiripol, Y., Mukprasirt, A. and Schoenlechner, R. (2012). Quality improvement of rice-based gluten-free bread using dif- ferent dietary fibre fractions of rice bran. J. Cereal Sci. (Article in press).
  3. Sharadanant, R. and Khan, K. (2003). Effect of hydrophilic gums on the quality of frozen dough: II. Bread characteristics. Cereal Chem., 80(6), 773-780.
  4. American Association of Cereal Chemists. (1983). Approved meth- od of AACC (8 th ed.), St. Paul, MN: The Association.
  5. Azizi, M.H. and Rao, G.V. (2004). Effect of surfactant gel and gum combinations on dough rheological characteristics and quality of bread. J. Food Quality., 27(5), 320-336.
  6. Bell, D.A. (1990). Methylcellulose as a structure enhancer in bread baking. Cereal Food World., 35(10), 1001-1006.
  7. Cauvain, S.P. and Young, L.S. (2007). "Technology of Breadmak- ing" (2 nd ed.). Springer Science + Business Media, LLC., New York, PP 285-286.
  8. Dziezak, J.D. (1991). A focus on gums. Food Technol., 45(3), 115- 132.
  9. Faridi, H.A., Finney, P.L. and Rubenthaler, G.L. (1981). Micro bak- ing evaluation of some U.S. wheat classes for suitability in Ira- nian bread. Cereal Chem., 58(5), 428-432.
  10. Grover, J.A. (1982). Methylcellulose (MC) and hydroxypropyl- methylcellulose (HPMC). In "Food hydrocolloids,"ed by M. Glicksmen. Boca Raton: CRC Press, pp. 121-154.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MALEKI, G., & MILANI, J. M.
Affiliations
Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University (IR)
Venue
Food Science and Technology Research
Published
2013
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
353-358
ISSN
  • 1344-6606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1881-3984
OpenAlex
W2072725069
Cited by
36
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Food Science and Technology Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Polysaccharides Composition and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Proteins in Food Systems
Keywords
hydrocolloids, guar gum, xanthan gum, carboxymethyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, dough rheology, bread physical properties, specific volume, oven spring, bread moisture content, sensory properties

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review