CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 522Critical Race Theory in EducationFeminist Theory and Gender StudiesMulticultural Socio-Legal Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Looking White People in the Eye

Razack, Sherene·1998·University of Toronto Press eBooks
DOI 10.3138/9781442670204
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Examining the classroom discussion of equity issues and legal cases involving immigration and sexual violence, Razack addresses how non-white women are viewed, and how they must respond, in classrooms and courtrooms.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3138/9781442670204

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 501–522 of 522

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Razack, S.
Corresponding author
Razack, Sherene
ORCID
Razack, Sherene
Venue
University of Toronto Press eBooks
Publisher
University of Toronto Press
Published
1998-12-31
DOI
10.3138/9781442670204
OpenAlex
W4299561982
Semantic Scholar
7c554c64fd6888777390016ea6eae85189254a0f
Cited by
521
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 24
FWCI
22.90
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
University of Toronto Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminist Theory and Gender Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies
Keywords
non-white women, racial equity, immigration, sexual violence, classroom discussion, court cases, representation of women, race and gender

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review