8. The Charter Beat: The Impact of Rights Decisions on Canadian Policing
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The themes of the literature on carceral institutions in Canada by settler political scientists focus on the judiciary; political ideology; criminalization; and colonial violence, genocide and residential schools.
“The themes of this literature focus on the judiciary (Riddell and Baker, 2018;Small and Puddister, 2020); 10 political ideology (Kelly and Puddister, 2017;Gordon, 2021); 11 criminalization (Hindmarch et al., 2018;Hindmarch and Orsini, 2021;Kilty andOrsini, 2019a, 2019b;Kilty et al., 2017;Johnson and Porth, 2023); 12 and colonial violence, genocide and residential schools (MacDonald, 2020;MacDonald”
From Decolonizing Research on the Carceral in Canadian Political Science (2023) · cites this paper as Riddell and Baker, 2018
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Decolonizing Research on the Carceral in Canadian Political Science
Mussell, L. (2023) · Canadian Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0008423923000288 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Riddell, T., & Baker, D.
- Venue
- Policy Change, Courts, and the Canadian Constitution
- Publisher
- University of Toronto Press
- Published
- 2018-12-31
- Pages
- 169-188
- OpenAlex
- W2912487713
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- University of Toronto Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Law and Evidence
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Keywords
- Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, police discretion, policing, Canadian courts, police accountability, constitutional law
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
