Cited by 350Evaluation and Performance AssessmentPublic Policy and Administration ResearchAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Addressing Attribution through Contribution Analysis: Using Performance Measures Sensibly

Open access
Mayne, John·2001·Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation

Abstract

Abstract: The changing culture of public administration involves accountability for results and outcomes. This article suggests that performance measurement can address such attribution questions. Contribution analysis has a major role to play in helping managers, researchers, and policymakers to arrive at conclusions about the contribution their program has made to particular outcomes. The article describes the steps necessary to produce a credible contribution story.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3138/cjpe.016.001

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mayne, J.
Affiliations
Government of Canada (CA)
Corresponding author
Mayne, John
Venue
Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation
Published
2001-03
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
1-24
ISSN
  • 0834-1516 (ISSN-L)
  • 1496-7308
OpenAlex
W2113515522
Cited by
350
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 18
FWCI
8.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Keywords
contribution analysis, performance measurement, attribution, program outcomes, accountability, public administration, program evaluation, causal inference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review