The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Socio-cognitive Functions of L1 Collaborative Interaction in the L2 Classroom
Abstract
This paper studies the use of L1 in the collaborative interaction of adult learners of Spanish who are native speakers of English. Viewed as a psychological tool that mediates human mental activity on the external (interpsychological) and the internal (intrapsychological) planes, L1 use is found to serve a critical function in students' attempts to mutually define various elements of their task, that is, to establish and maintain intersubjectivity (Rommetveit, 1985). Also, L1 is shown to be an indispensable device for students in providing each other with scaffolded help (Wood, Bruner, & Ross, 1976). Finally, this study provides evidence of the use of L1 for the purpose of externalizing one's inner speech (Vygotsky, 1986) throughout the task as a means of regulating one's own mental activity. The analysis of student interaction presented here not only highlights these critical functions of L1 in the second language learning process, but attempts to show how various communicative moves and linguistic forms achieve these functions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
THE ROLE OF TUTORING IN PROBLEM SOLVING *
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x · Cited by 8,851 · cited 1×
“Interpsychologically, the use of LI enables learners to work effectively in the zone of proximal development (ZPD) by providing scaffolded help (Wood et al., 1976) to each other and by enabling them to construct a shared perspective of the task, that is, to achieve intersubjectivity (Rommetveit, 1985).”
BackgroundGroup Work, Interlanguage Talk, and Second Language Acquisition
Long, M. H., & Porter, P. A. (1985) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586827 · Cited by 901
Cited by
Using the First Language in the Classroom
Cook, V. (2001) · The Canadian Modern Language Review · doi:10.3138/cmlr.57.3.402 · Cited by 1,404
(2007) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · Cited by 951
To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer's own writing
Lundstrom, K., & Baker, W. (2009) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2008.06.002 · Cited by 843
Macaro, E. (2001) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/0026-7902.00124 · Cited by 579
Conceptualising the potential role of L1 in CLIL
Lin, A. M. Y. (2015) · Language, Culture and Curriculum · doi:10.1080/07908318.2014.1000926 · Cited by 240
Metadata
- Authors
- Antón, M., & DiCamilla, F.
- Venue
- The Canadian Modern Language Review
- Published
- 1998-04-01
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 314-342
- ISSN
- 0008-4506 (ISSN-L)
- 1710-1131
- OpenAlex
- W2098353209
- Cited by
- 544
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 50.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Socio-cognitive Functions of L1 Collaborative Interaction in the L2 Classroom. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3138/cmlr.54.3.314
- The paper
- Antón, M., & DiCamilla, F. (1998). Socio-cognitive Functions of L1 Collaborative Interaction in the L2 Classroom. The Canadian Modern Language Review. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.54.3.314
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.