Technology and Indigenous Language Revitalization: Analyzing the Experience of Hawai'i
Abstract
Hawaiian educators have made ambitious attempts to use new on-line technologies in language revitalization programs. These efforts have included developing one of the first bulletin board systems in the world to operate completely in an indigenous language. This paper reports on two years of ethnographic research on the results of these efforts. Issues addressed include the role of the Internet in promoting or hindering linguistic diversity, the relationship of multimedia computing to non-Western patterns of communication, and the use of the Internet as a medium for exploring cultural and social identity. The results are consistent with a critical theory of technology which emphasizes that technology is neither culturally neutral nor determinist but rather a site of social struggle.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Email lists and the like enabled platforms for sharing Indigenous innovations, aspirations and concerns across different website groups.
“Email lists and the like enabled platforms for sharing Indigenous innovations, aspirations and concerns across different website groups (Grenoble & Whaley, 2006; Warschauer, 1998).”
From Decolonizing the digital landscape: the role of technology in Indigenous language revitalization (2021) · cites this paper as Warschauer, 1998
Cites
The Rise of the Network Society
Castells, M. (2009) · doi:10.1002/9781444319514 · Cited by 4,664 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Researching technology in TESOL: Determinist, instrumental, and critical approaches
Warschauer, M. (1998) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3588010 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Decolonizing the digital landscape: the role of technology in Indigenous language revitalization
Meighan, P. J. (2021) · AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples · doi:10.1177/11771801211037672 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
- Authors
- Warschauer, M.
- Corresponding author
- Warschauer, Mark
- ORCID
- Warschauer, Mark
- Venue
- The Canadian Modern Language Review
- Published
- 1998-10-01
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 139-159
- ISSN
- 0008-4506 (ISSN-L)
- 1710-1131
- OpenAlex
- W2153108386
- Cited by
- 73
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 4.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Canadian Modern Language Review/ La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
- Social Sciences › Education › Indigenous and Place-Based Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › ICT in Developing Communities
- Keywords
- Hawaiian language revitalization, Indigenous language revitalization, internet technologies, bulletin boards, multimedia computing, critical theory of technology, Hawaii
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review