Cited by 112Second Language Acquisition and LearningEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningLinguistic Studies and Language Acquisition

Analyzing late interlanguage with learner corpora: Québec replications of three European studies

Cobb, Tom·2003·The Canadian Modern Language Review

Abstract

The characterization of learner interlanguage has been largely confined to the early acquisition of speech in a second language (L2), with later acquisition not commonly analyzed in this framework for lack of theory, lack of data, and the fact that late acquisition is intermeshed with the acquisition of literacy. The current trend to electronic submission of classroom writing relieves the data problem, defines steps in the acquisition of literacy, and may even contribute to the growth of theory. When assembled by teachers or researchers into a learner corpus (LC) of suitable size and character, such a corpus provides the empirical means to discover what advanced learners know and do not know about their L2. A strong tradition of LC analysis has emerged in Europe; the present study introduces this work and tests its applicability to a North American context.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3138/cmlr.59.3.393

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CSL learners are likely to 'talk written down'.

    “It has been suggested that the CSL learners are likely to “talk written down,” which has been revealed in previous studies of English interlanguage (Petch-Tyson, 1998; Cobb, 2003).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cobb, T.
Corresponding author
Cobb, Tom
Venue
The Canadian Modern Language Review
Published
2003-03-01
Volume
59
Issue
3
Pages
393-424
ISSN
  • 0008-4506 (ISSN-L)
  • 1710-1131
OpenAlex
W1978242712
Cited by
112
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 10
FWCI
5.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Canadian Modern Language Review/ La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Linguistic Studies and Language Acquisition
Keywords
learner corpus, second language acquisition, advanced learners, literacy acquisition, classroom writing, replication study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review