Cross - National Marriages: A Review of the Literature
Abstract
This paper reviewing the available literature on cross-national marriage (in English) is divided into three section. First, the 33 studies reviewed are classified into three types, each with a dominant theme: war bride/colonizer marriages-- isolation and alienation, educated Western non Western marriages--wives cultural adjustment and marginality, and educated WesternWestern marriages -- wives’ desire for bi-lingual children and career fulfillment. Second, ways in which this body of literature fails to represent the phenomenon of cross-national marriage are identified, suggesting directions for future research. Limitations of this literature include: small, non-random samples; emphasis on foreign wives’ experiences; focus on the couple; emphasis on Americans in cross-national marriages. Third, tentative generalizations are proposed based on these studies: participants in cross-national marriages are free, in various ways, from strong cultural constraints; they desire to maintain a bi-cultural identity; they generally conform to the cultural standards of the country of residence; adjustment is easier when the couple resides in the wife’s country; social attitudes about racial/cultural differences are more the source of conflict than the differences themselves.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Those research tended to focus on marital relationships rather than childrearing.
“Those research tended to focus on marital relationships rather than childrearing (Cottrell, 1990;Lee & Fernandez, 1998;Seto & Cavallaro, 2007).”
From Parenting Stress and Social Support among Cross-national and Traditional Families (2017) · cites this paper as Cottrell, 1990
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Parenting Stress and Social Support among Cross-national and Traditional Families
Xiang, Y., Hoot, J., & Raisor, J. (2017) · Journal of Family Diversity in Education · doi:10.53956/jfde.2017.103 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cottrell, A. B.
- Affiliations
- San Diego State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cottrell, Ann Baker
- ORCID
- Cottrell, Ann Baker
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Family Studies
- Published
- 1990-08-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 151-169
- ISSN
- 0047-2328 (ISSN-L)
- 1929-9850
- OpenAlex
- W2285648121
- Cited by
- 97
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Comparative Family Studies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › International Student and Expatriate Challenges
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Keywords
- international marriage, war brides, foreign brides, cultural adjustment, bilingualism, bicultural identity, cultural constraints, marital adjustment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review