Cited by 22Cultural Differences and ValuesSocial and Intergroup PsychologyPersonality Traits and Psychology

National character revisited

Open access
Inkeles, Alex·1991·The Tocqueville Review

Abstract

In the first edition of the Handbook of Social Psychology published in 1954 D. J. Levinson and I sought to define the field of national character research as "the study of modal personality and sociocultural systems". While acknowledging the legitimacy of deriving national character from the institutional or cultural forms shared by a population or from the behavior of their nation in acts such as war, peace and commerce, we urged that "national character ought to be equated with modal personality structure; that is, should refer to the mode or modes of distribution of personality variants within a given society".

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3138/ttr.12.83

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • National character, or the average personality type in a nation, has often been shown to be associated with such variables as happiness and depression.

    “National character, or the average personality type in a nation, has often been shown to be associated with such variables as happiness and depression (e.g., Inglehart 1990;Inkeles 1990;Stack and Eshelman 1998).”

    From The Effect of Religiosity on Tax Fraud Acceptability: A Cross‐National Analysis (2006) · cites this paper as Inkeles 1990

    In “The happiness of nations” (page unavailable), Inkeles treats stable national differences in self-reported happiness as a possible national-character trait and suggests links with child-rearing values. The paper does not establish an association with clinical depression or show that associations with both outcomes have often been demonstrated; its mention of “economic depression” refers to economic conditions. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Almond, Gabriel A. and Sidney Verba: The Civic Culture, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1963.
  2. Buchanan, W. and H. Cantril: How Nations See Each Other, Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1953.
  3. Butcher, James N. and Paolo Pancheri: A Handbook of Cross-National MMPI Research, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1976.
  4. Cantril, Hadley: The Pattern of Human Concerns, New Brunswick, N. J.: Rutghers Universi¬ ty Press, 1965.
  5. Cattell, Raymond B. and Samuel E. Krug: The Numbers of Factors in the 16Pf: A Review of the Evidence with Special Emphasis on Methodological Problems, in Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 46 (3), pp. 509-522, 1986.
  6. Cattell, Raymond B., R.E. Woliver, and R.K. Graham: The Relations of Syntality Dimen- sions of Modern National Cultures to the Personality Dimensions of their Popula¬ tions, in International Journal ofIntercultural Relations, Vol. 4, pp. 15-41, 1980.
  7. Dawson, John L. M. and Walter J. Lonner: Readings in Cross-Cultural Psychobgy, Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 1974. ESCR Data Archives: »European Values Survey: Gallup Weighted Marginals«, Study No. 2062, Essex: University of Essex, 1981.
  8. Form, William H: Blue-Collar Stratification. Autoworkers in Four Countries, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1976.
  9. Haire, Mason, Edwin E. Ghiselli, and Lyman W. Porter: Managerial Thinking: An Interna¬ tional Study, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1966.
  10. Hastings, Elizabeth H., and Philip K. Hastings, eds.: Index to International Public Opinion, Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1981-88.
  11. Hofstede, Geert: Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work Related Values, Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications, 1980.
  12. Inglehart, Ronald: The Silent Revolution. Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1977.
  13. Inkeles, Alex: Industrial Man; The Relation of Status to Experience, Perception, Value, American Journal of Sociobgy, Vol. 66, No. 1, July 1960, pp. 1-31.
  14. Inkeles, Alex, and Daniel J. Levinson: National Character: The Study of Modal Personali¬ ty and Sociocultural Systems, in The Handbook of Social Psychobgy, Gardiner Lindzey, ed., 1954, pp. 977-1020; and 2nd ed., G. Lindzey and E. Aronson, eds., Reading, Mass., Addison-Wesley, 1968-69, vol. IV, pp. 418-506. International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology, International Conference: Growth and Progress in Cross-cultural Psychology: Selected Papersfrom the Eighth Internatio¬ nal Conference, Berwyn: Swets North America, 1987.
  15. Japan Prime Ministers Office: International Comparative Survey ofthe Life and Percep- tion ofthe Old, Tokyo: Office ofthe Aged, Prime Minister's Office, 1982. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, vol. 1- , Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publica- tions, Mar., 1970.
  16. Klineberg, Otto, Marisa Zavaloni, Christiane Louis-Guerin, and Jeanne BenBrika: Stu- dents, Values, and Politics. A Crosscultural Comparison, New York: Macmillan: The Free Press, 1979.
  17. Ornauer, H., H. Wibert, A. Sicinski, and J. Galtung, eds.: Images ofthe World in the Year 2000: a Comparative Ten Nation Study, Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press, 1976.
  18. Rokkan, Stein (with Angus Campbell, Per Torsvik, and Henry Valen): Citizens, Elections, Parties: Approaches to the Comparative Study of Process ofDevebpment, New York: David McKay, Co., 1970, pp. 334-351.
  19. Triandis, Harry C. and Richard W. Brislin, eds.: Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychobgy: Social Psychology, vol. 5, Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc., 1980.
  20. Verba, Sidney, Norman H. Nie, and Kim Jaeon: Participation and Political Equality: A Seven Nation Comparison, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Inkeles, A.
Corresponding author
Inkeles, Alex
Venue
The Tocqueville Review
Published
1991-12
Volume
12
Pages
83-117
ISSN
  • 0730-479X (ISSN-L)
  • 1918-6649
OpenAlex
W2567584057
Cited by
22
References
0
Citations by year
2012: 1
FWCI
3.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Tocqueville Review/La revue Tocqueville (publishedVersion)
  • Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences) (submittedVersion)
  • OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
national character, personality structure, sociocultural systems, cultural influences on personality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review