Cited by 6Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAging, Elder Care, and Social IssuesHealthcare innovation and challenges

Living Alone with Dementia in England – Managing without Informal Support to Contact and Navigate Services: A Mixed-Methods Protocol

Open access
Aspinal, Fiona, Willcox, Amanda, Murphy, Damian, Sanders, Tim, Brooks, Jenni·2023·Journal of Long Term Care

Abstract

Background: Much of the evidence about good practice and commissioning in dementia services focuses on the person with dementia-carer dyad. We know that people with dementia who live alone and do not have informal support experience worse outcomes, but we know little about the additional support needs experienced by this group, nor do we know about service responses to accommodate any additional or different needs. Aim: This research aims to understand the needs and experiences of people with dementia who live on their own and do not have someone to help them access services or act as a point of contact. It will also explore whether and how services respond to the unique needs of this group of people with dementia to help them to live at home for as long as possible. Methods: The project commenced in April 2022 and will report in November 2023. There are four consecutive elements: an on-line audit of social care dementia commissioners in local authorities in two regions of England about services for this client group; in person/on-line interviews/focus groups with people with dementia who live alone and don’t have someone to navigate their care; and qualitative case studies of four different service examples. Two stakeholder consultation workshops will be held at the end of the project to identify areas for action and co-design resources for different stakeholders. The findings from each element will inform subsequent ones. Impact: Feedback loops will be embedded throughout this research to maximise opportunities for rapid action in response to findings. These include regional Sharing and Learning Networks and bi-monthly newsletters. A series of outputs targeted at different audiences, including academic and practice publications and events, and co-produced resources for people with dementia and social care commissioners and providers, will be produced. Dementia-focused networks will facilitate dissemination.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.31389/jltc.194

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Living alone with dementia without carer involvement has been associated with worse health outcomes, such as lower life satisfaction and delayed access to services.

    “Living alone with dementia without carer involvement has been associated with worse health outcomes, such as lower life satisfaction and delayed access to services [113]; as those without carers are often excluded from research this highlights a gap in our understanding of how to assist those returning home without a network to support their needs [113].”

    From Do hospital-to-home transitions work for older adults with multiple long-term conditions including dementia? A realist review (2025) · cites this paper as [113]

    The Introduction reports delayed access to support for people with dementia living alone without support, and says people without a carer are often excluded from research. It also reports lower life satisfaction among people living alone, including those with low support, but does not establish that finding specifically for those without a carer. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Bowling, A. 2002. Research Methods in Health. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
  2. MacKenzie, J. 2009. 'The same but different: Working with lesbian and gay people with dementia'. Journal of Dementia Care, 17(6): 17-19.
  3. Mukadam, N, Cooper, C and Livingston, G. 2011. 'A systematic review of ethnicity and pathways to care in Dementia'. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 26(1): 12-20.
  4. Ritchie, J and Lewis, J. (eds.) 2003. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage.
  5. Ritchie, J, Lewis, J, McNaughton Nicholls, C and Ormston, R. (eds.) 2014. Qualitative Research Practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. 2nd edn. London: Sage.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aspinal, F., Willcox, A., Murphy, D., Sanders, T., & Brooks, J.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • Sheffield Hallam University (GB)
  • Innovations in Dementia Community Interest Company (GB)
  • Leeds City Council (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Aspinal, Fiona
  • Willcox, Amanda
  • Murphy, Damian
  • Sanders, Tim
  • Brooks, Jenni
Venue
Journal of Long Term Care
Publisher
LSE Press
Published
2023
Pages
135-141
ISSN
2516-9122 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4384914431
Cited by
6
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3
FWCI
1.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Journal of Long-Term Care (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • SHURA (Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive) (Sheffield Hallam University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
NIHR RfPB Research for Social Care (NIHR202965)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
  • Social Sciences › Education › Healthcare innovation and challenges
Keywords
dementia, living alone, informal support, social care services, access to services, care navigation, person-centred care, local government, home care, co-design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review