Cited by 1Vibration Control and Rheological FluidsSeismic and Structural Analysis of Tall BuildingsSeismic Performance and Analysis

Vibration Control in High-Rise Buildings for Multi-Hazard

Open access
Abburu, Srinivasa Adithya Sailesh·2022

Abstract

Increasing population and migration of people to cities has led to the construction of high-rise buildings. High-rise buildings have received a renewed interest in many city business locations, where land is scarce, as per their economic, sustainability and other benefits. Taller and taller towers are being built everywhere in the world. However, the increased frequency of multi-hazard disasters makes it challenging to balance between a resilient and sustainable construction. As a saying, ‘with new inventions come new problems’. High-rise buildings usually have issues with increased wind loads brought by, for instance, hurricanes, which can decrease their serviceability and cause failure of the structure. Although floor accelerations under wind loads are lower than those under earthquake loads, they occur for a relatively long time that raises comfort and serviceability issues. However, inter-story drifts under wind loads can raise security issues. The results presented in this thesis show that high-rise and slender buildings designed for wind may be safe under moderate earthquake loads, regarding the main force resisting system. Nevertheless, nonstructural components may present a significant percentage of loss exposure of buildings to earthquakes due to higher floor accelerations. Accordingly, the effect of earthquakes on tall buildings cannot be ignored. Damping devices are used to mitigate wind effects in tall buildings. These damping devices can also reduce the earthquake effects, but not to the full extent. In this thesis, the performance of a tuned mass damper (TMD) is studied under wind and earthquake loads (multi-hazard loading). A 76-story benchmark building is used in the analysis under multi-hazard loading. A new type of TMD called pounding tuned mass damper (PTMD) has growing importance in the reduction of earthquake effects. We adapt this PTMD for tall buildings and study its performance under multi-hazard loads, and compare it with a conventional TMD. In addition, the performance of viscous dampers in reducing earthquake effects is investigated. The main objective of the current study was to further the understanding of the impact of multi-hazard loading, brought by wind and earthquakes, on the behavior of high-rise buildings, in order to apply such knowledge to design.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.31390/gradschool_theses.1991

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abburu, S. A. S.
Affiliations
Louisiana State University (US)
Corresponding author
Abburu, Srinivasa Adithya Sailesh
Published
2015-11-03
OpenAlex
W2807578586
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2020: 1
Type
dissertation
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Seismic and Structural Analysis of Tall Buildings
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Seismic Performance and Analysis
Keywords
high-rise buildings, vibration control, wind loads, seismic loading, tuned mass damper, viscous dampers, inter-story drift, floor acceleration, non-structural components, serviceability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review